High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage — Petitioner Directly Approached High Court Without Exhausting Remedy Before Sessions Court Under Section 482 BNSS. Court Held That While Direct Approach Is Permissible in Exceptional Circumstances, Petitioner Should Ordinarily First Approach Sessions Court.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 33
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri. Imran H, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 3/2025 registered at Santhebennur Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 69 and 318(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. The case arose from a complaint lodged by Rabiya Basri, who alleged that the petitioner, a fellow teacher at Wisdom School in Hosur Village, promised to marry her and committed sexual intercourse, later cheating her. The petitioner directly approached the High Court without first seeking anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court. The court noted that while ordinarily a petitioner should first approach the Sessions Court, in exceptional circumstances the High Court can entertain a petition under Section 482 BNSS. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions, including that he shall cooperate with the investigation and not tamper with evidence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Anticipatory Bail - Direct Approach to High Court - Section 482 BNSS, 2023 - Petitioner directly approached High Court for anticipatory bail without exhausting remedy before Sessions Court - Court held that in exceptional circumstances, High Court can entertain petition under Section 482 BNSS directly, but ordinarily petitioner should first approach Sessions Court - However, considering facts, Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions (Paras 4-6).

B) Criminal Law - Rape - Promise of Marriage - Sections 69, 318(2) BNS, 2023 - Allegation that accused committed sexual intercourse on promise of marriage and later cheated - Court considered nature of allegations and granted anticipatory bail (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, when he directly approached the High Court without first seeking remedy before the Sessions Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Law Points

  • Anticipatory bail
  • Direct approach to High Court
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • Section 438 Cr.PC
  • Promise of marriage
  • Sexual intercourse
  • Cheating
  • BNS Sections 69 and 318(2)
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (KAR) (01) 7

CRL.P No. 362 of 2025 (438(Cr.PC) / 482(BNSS))

2025-01-31

Mohammad Nawaz

NC: 2025:KHC:4503

Sri. Tajuddin (for petitioner), Sri. Harish Ganapathy (HCGP for respondent), Sri. Sameer S.N. (for defacto complainant)

Sri. Imran H

State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition for anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in Crime No. 3/2025

Filing Reason

Petitioner was accused of offences under Sections 69 and 318(2) BNS based on complaint of sexual intercourse on promise of marriage and cheating

Previous Decisions

Petitioner directly approached High Court without first seeking anticipatory bail before Sessions Court

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS when he directly approached the High Court without exhausting remedy before Sessions Court

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued for grant of anticipatory bail Respondent/State opposed the petition

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court can entertain a petition under Section 482 BNSS for anticipatory bail directly in exceptional circumstances, though ordinarily the petitioner should first approach the Sessions Court. Considering the facts, anticipatory bail was granted.

Judgment Excerpts

In this petition preferred under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner/accused in Crime No.3/2025 of Santhebennur Police Station has sought to release him on anticipatory bail. Petitioner has directly approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail. He has not availed the remedy before the Sessions Court.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 BNSS directly before the High Court of Karnataka seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No. 3/2025 registered at Santhebennur Police Station. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 28.01.2025, and the order was pronounced on 31.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS): 482
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS): 69, 318(2)
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC): 438
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage — Petitioner Directly Approached High Court Without Exhausting Remedy Before Sessions Court Under Section 482 BNSS. Court Held That While Direct A...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 o...