Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties Under Section 82 of Representation of People Act, 1951. Petitioner failed to implead all contesting candidates as required, leading to dismissal under Section 86(1).

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dr. Kanagsabapathy Sundaram Pillai, filed an election petition under Section 101 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, seeking a declaration that he be declared the returned candidate for the 31-PC Mumbai-South constituency. The petitioner had submitted his nomination form on 9 April 2019, the last date for submission, and was asked to comply with certain objections by 3:00 p.m. on the same day. He later received a call at 7:00 p.m. informing him that his nomination was rejected. The petitioner challenged the rejection, alleging that the returning officer (Respondent No.1) acted arbitrarily. However, during the hearing, the court observed that the petition did not implead all the contesting candidates as required under Section 82 of the Act. The court expressed its inclination to dismiss the petition under Section 86(1) read with Section 82. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition, but the court noted that under Section 109, withdrawal requires notice to all parties and publication in the official gazette. Since the respondents did not consent to withdrawal, the court proceeded to dismiss the petition on merits for non-joinder of necessary parties. The court held that the failure to implead all candidates is a fatal defect, and the petition is liable to be dismissed under Section 86(1) of the Act.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties - Section 82, 86(1) Representation of People Act, 1951 - Dismissal of Election Petition - Petitioner filed election petition challenging election from 31-PC Mumbai-South but failed to implead all contesting candidates as required under Section 82 - Court held that non-compliance with Section 82 is fatal and petition is liable to be dismissed under Section 86(1) - Held that the petition is dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties under Section 86(1) read with Section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The election petition is dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties under Section 86(1) read with Section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.

Law Points

  • Non-joinder of necessary parties
  • Election petition dismissal
  • Section 82 Representation of People Act 1951
  • Section 86(1) Representation of People Act 1951
  • Section 109 Representation of People Act 1951
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 68

ELECTION PETITION NO.17 OF 2019

2020-10-09

K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

Dr. Kanagsabapathy Sundaram Pillai (petitioner in person), Mr. Pradeep Rajagopal a/w Ms. Drishti Shah i/b Ms Rekha Rajagopal for Respondent No.1, Mr. Balkrishna Joshi a/w Mr. Jagdish Sawant and Mr. V. V. Pethe for Respondent No.2

Dr. Kanagsabapathy Sundaram Pillai

Shri Bansi Gawali, Arvind Ganpat Sawant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Election petition challenging rejection of nomination and seeking declaration as returned candidate.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that petitioner be declared as the returned candidate for 31 PC-Mumbai-South under Section 101 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's nomination was rejected by the returning officer after he was asked to comply with objections.

Issues

Whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties under Section 86(1) read with Section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his nomination was wrongly rejected and sought declaration as returned candidate. Respondents argued that the petition is not maintainable due to non-joinder of necessary parties.

Ratio Decidendi

An election petition must implead all contesting candidates as required under Section 82 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Failure to do so renders the petition liable to be dismissed under Section 86(1) of the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner has approached this court for various reliefs including for a declaration that petitioner be declared as the returned candidate to fill the post 31 PC-Mumbai-South, under Section 101 of the Representation of People Act 1951 (the said Act). I am inclined to dismiss the petition under the provisions of Section 86(1) read with Section 82 of the Act.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Election Petition No.17 of 2019 on an unspecified date. During hearing, court expressed inclination to dismiss for non-joinder. Petitioner sought withdrawal, but court proceeded to dismiss on merits.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of People Act, 1951: 82, 86(1), 101, 109
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties Under Section 82 of Representation of People Act, 1951. Petitioner failed to implead all contesting candidates as required, leading to dismissal under Section 86(1).
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Royalty on Ordinary Earth — Notification Dated 03.02.2000 Declared Ultra Vires. Ordinary Earth Not a Mineral Under Section 3(e) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.