Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Corroboration. Dying declaration recorded without medical certification and oral dying declaration uncorroborated leads to acquittal under Sections 302 and 307 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Balu Chandar Rajput for offences under Sections 302 and 307 IPC. The case arose from an incident on 30 October 2000 where the accused allegedly hit the deceased Bhagwan Bhiva Rajput with a stone on the chest and assaulted his wife with a sickle. The deceased's statement was recorded by a police head constable (PW11) at the hospital without a doctor certifying his fitness. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the dying declaration unreliable. The High Court upheld the acquittal, noting that the dying declaration lacked medical certification and the oral dying declaration to the wife and villagers was not corroborated by medical evidence or other witnesses. The court held that the trial court's findings were not perverse and declined to interfere.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Reliability - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Dying declaration recorded by police head constable without certification of fitness by doctor held unreliable - Court held that absence of medical certification raises doubt about the declarant's mental fitness to make statement, and such declaration cannot be sole basis for conviction (Paras 7-10).

B) Criminal Law - Oral Dying Declaration - Corroboration - Sections 302, 307 IPC - Oral dying declaration made to wife and villagers not corroborated by medical evidence or other witnesses - Court held that oral dying declaration must be corroborated by independent evidence; in absence of corroboration, conviction cannot be sustained (Paras 11-14).

C) Criminal Law - Acquittal Appeal - Interference by High Court - Section 378 CrPC - High Court will not interfere with acquittal unless findings are perverse or unreasonable - Court held that trial court's acquittal based on appreciation of evidence is not perverse, hence no interference warranted (Paras 15-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dying declaration recorded by a police head constable without medical certification of fitness is reliable, and whether the oral dying declaration is corroborated by other evidence to sustain conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The judgment and order of acquittal passed by the trial court is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • reliability
  • corroboration
  • medical certification
  • Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 57

Criminal Appeal No.351 of 2002

2020-10-13

Prasanna B. Varale, V. G. Bisht

V. B. KondeDeshmukh (APP for Appellant), None for Respondent

The State of Maharashtra

Balu Chandar Rajput

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal

Remedy Sought

State sought conviction of respondent for offences under Sections 302 and 307 IPC

Filing Reason

State challenged the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30 November 2001 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.29 of 2001

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted the respondent of all charges

Issues

Whether the dying declaration recorded by police head constable without medical certification is reliable? Whether the oral dying declaration is corroborated by other evidence? Whether the High Court should interfere with the acquittal?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (State) argued that the dying declaration was reliable and should be the basis for conviction. Respondent (accused) did not appear; no submissions made.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration recorded without medical certification of fitness is unreliable and cannot be the sole basis for conviction. An oral dying declaration must be corroborated by independent evidence. The High Court will not interfere with an acquittal unless the findings are perverse or unreasonable.

Judgment Excerpts

The dying declaration recorded by a police head constable without certification of fitness by a doctor is unreliable. Oral dying declaration must be corroborated by independent evidence. High Court will not interfere with acquittal unless findings are perverse.

Procedural History

The trial court (6th Additional Sessions Judge, Satara) acquitted the respondent on 30 November 2001 in Sessions Case No.29 of 2001. The State appealed to the Bombay High Court on 13 October 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 307, 323, 324, 504
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 378
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Lack of Corroboration. Dying declaration recorded without medical certification and oral dying declaration uncorroborated leads to acquittal under Sections 302...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teachers' Petitions for Salary Revision Under 7th Pay Commission — Directs State to Treat Petitioners as Government Aided School Teachers for Pay Fixation. Teachers in Private Aided Schools Entitled to Same Pay Scales as Go...