Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Converted to Section 304 Part I IPC. Single Stone Blow During Sudden Quarrel Over Abusive Language Does Not Constitute Murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sachin Subhash Londhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, for the murder of Amol Pawar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 22nd July 2014, when the deceased and the appellant were consuming liquor together. A quarrel ensued after the deceased abused the appellant's mother. The appellant struck the deceased with a stone on the head, causing death. The prosecution examined 10 witnesses, including eyewitnesses and medical experts. The trial court convicted the appellant, holding that the act was intentional and fell under murder. On appeal, the Bombay High Court examined the evidence and found that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The court noted that the appellant had no intention to cause death and that the single blow was inflicted in the heat of passion upon sudden provocation. The court held that the case fell under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, which reduces culpable homicide to not amounting to murder. Consequently, the conviction under Section 302 IPC was set aside and altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. The appellant was sentenced to the period already undergone (approximately 4 years and 3 months) and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC - Single blow - Sudden quarrel - The appellant assaulted the deceased with a single stone blow on the head during a sudden quarrel over abusive language. The court held that the act did not attract the offence of murder as there was no intention to cause death and the act was done without premeditation in a sudden fight. The conviction under Section 302 IPC was altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. (Paras 1-16)

B) Criminal Law - Provocation - Abusive language - The deceased had abused the appellant's mother, which provoked the appellant to retaliate. The court considered this as a mitigating factor, bringing the case within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. (Paras 3, 16)

C) Criminal Law - Sentencing - Section 304 Part I IPC - The court sentenced the appellant to the period already undergone (about 4 years and 3 months) and reduced the fine to Rs. 1,000/-. (Para 16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide, particularly Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The conviction under Section 302 IPC is set aside and altered to Section 304 Part I IPC. The appellant is sentenced to the period already undergone (approximately 4 years and 3 months) and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Single blow
  • Lack of intention to cause death
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (10) 46

Criminal Appeal No. 714 of 2016

2020-10-01

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, N.J. Jamadar

Mr. Prosper D’souza (for Appellant), Ms. P.P. Shinde (APP for Respondent)

Sachin Subhash Londhe

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of conviction to a lesser offence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment; he appealed against the conviction and sentence.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable. Whether the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, i.e., culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the single blow did not indicate intention to cause death. Prosecution argued that the appellant intentionally caused death by striking with a stone, amounting to murder.

Ratio Decidendi

A single blow inflicted during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, without intention to cause death, falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, constituting culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant herein takes exception to the judgment and order dated 7th April 2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur in Sessions Case No.51 of 2014 thereby convicting him for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused had admitted the scene of offence panchanama, inquest panchanama and the postmortem report.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur on 7th April 2016 in Sessions Case No.51 of 2014 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which reserved judgment on 8th September 2020 and pronounced on 1st October 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 304 Part I, 300 Exception 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Property Title Dispute Due to Failure to Prove Ownership. The plaintiff's suit for possession was rejected as they could not establish title to the disputed land, with appellate courts re-evaluating evidence under...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eye-Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.