Bombay High Court Allows Convicts' Applications for Furlough During COVID-19 Pandemic - Open Prison Convicts Granted Furlough Despite Pending Police Reports Due to Extraordinary Circumstances

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to six criminal applications filed by convicts housed in open prisons in Maharashtra (Paithan and Visapur) seeking furlough during the COVID-19 pandemic. The applicants, represented by Advocate Rupesh A. Jaiswal, argued that they were entitled to furlough under the Maharashtra Prison Rules, but their applications were pending due to non-receipt of police reports. The State, represented by various Additional Public Prosecutors, opposed the applications on the ground that police reports were awaited. The court, comprising Justices T.V. Nalawade and M.G. Sewlikar, observed that the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to be with family, and furlough is a privilege that can be granted even if police reports are pending, especially in extraordinary circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic. The court noted that there are no specific rules for furlough for open prison convicts, but the general rules for furlough can be applied. The court directed the authorities to consider the applications and grant furlough subject to conditions such as furnishing surety and reporting to the police station. The court also directed that the period of furlough be treated as parole if furlough rules are not applicable. The judgment was delivered on 14th September 2020.

Headnote

A) Prison Law - Furlough - Open Prison Convicts - Maharashtra Prison Rules - The court considered applications by convicts in open prisons for furlough during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court held that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to be with family, and furlough is a privilege that can be granted even if police reports are pending, especially in extraordinary circumstances like the pandemic. (Paras 1-5)

B) Prison Law - Open Prison - Applicability of Furlough Rules - Maharashtra Prison Rules - The court noted that there are no specific rules for furlough for open prison convicts, but the general rules for furlough can be applied. The court directed the authorities to consider the applications and grant furlough subject to conditions. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether convicts in open prisons are entitled to furlough during the COVID-19 pandemic despite pending police reports and the absence of specific rules for open prisons?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the applications and directed the authorities to grant furlough to the applicants subject to conditions such as furnishing surety and reporting to the police station. The period of furlough was directed to be treated as parole if furlough rules are not applicable.

Law Points

  • Furlough
  • Open Prison
  • COVID-19
  • Prison Rules
  • Maharashtra Prison Rules
  • Right to Life
  • Article 21
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (09) 1

Criminal Application No. 1524 of 2020 in Writ Petition No. 685 of 2020 and connected matters

2020-09-14

T.V. Nalawade, M.G. Sewlikar

Mr. Rupesh A. Jaiswal (for applicants), Mr. B.V. Virdhe, Mr. Y.G. Gujarathi, Mr. G.O. Wattamwar, Mr. P.N. Kutti, Mr. R.B. Bagul (for respondent)

Faruk S/o Mustak Khan, Bhausaheb S/o Kondaji Randhir, Abhijit S/o Kalyan Warekar, Balu S/o Sidram Makase, Jagdish S/o Sharnappa Kumasgi, Uttam S/o Anna Lande

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal applications for furlough by convicts in open prisons during COVID-19 pandemic

Remedy Sought

Direction to the authorities to grant furlough to the applicants

Filing Reason

Applications for furlough were pending due to non-receipt of police reports

Issues

Whether convicts in open prisons are entitled to furlough during the COVID-19 pandemic despite pending police reports? Whether the absence of specific rules for furlough for open prison convicts bars the grant of furlough?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicants argued that they are entitled to furlough under the Maharashtra Prison Rules and that the pendency of police reports should not be a ground to deny furlough, especially during the pandemic. Respondent argued that furlough cannot be granted until police reports are received.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to be with family, and furlough is a privilege that can be granted even if police reports are pending, especially in extraordinary circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic. The absence of specific rules for open prison convicts does not bar the grant of furlough; general rules can be applied.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the side. The court observed that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to be with family, and furlough is a privilege that can be granted even if police reports are pending, especially in extraordinary circumstances like the pandemic.

Procedural History

The applicants filed criminal applications in their respective writ petitions seeking furlough. The court heard the matter on 14th September 2020 and allowed the applications.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21
  • Maharashtra Prison Rules:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held that Balance of Convenience Lies in Favour of Defendants and No Irreparable Loss Would Be Caused to Plaintiff. The...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Contractor's Writ Petition for Mandamus — Directs Release of Balance Payment for Work Executed Under Scheme. Unilateral Deduction Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Right to Payment.