Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Parties — Section 326 IPC Offence Non-Compoundable but Court Exercises Inherent Powers to Quash in Interest of Justice. The court held that the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are not curtailed by Section 320 CrPC and can be invoked to quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences when parties have genuinely settled.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, refusing to quash FIR No. 148/2019 registered at Police Station Washim (Rural) for offences under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The dispute arose between the appellants and respondent No. 2 (the complainant) over a trivial issue, leading to a scuffle in which the complainant sustained injuries. During the pendency of the appeals, the parties entered into a compromise and filed a joint application before the trial court. The trial court rejected the application on the ground that the offence under Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable. The appellants then approached the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR and criminal proceedings. The High Court, after hearing the parties, noted that the dispute was private in nature and the parties had amicably settled their differences. The court observed that the complainant did not wish to pursue the case and that the chances of conviction were bleak. Relying on the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the court held that it could quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences to secure the ends of justice. The court accordingly allowed the appeals, quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, and set aside the trial court's order.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences - Sections 482, 320 CrPC - The court considered whether proceedings under Section 326 IPC (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons) can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties. Held that though Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable, the High Court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings to secure the ends of justice, especially when the dispute is private and the parties have settled. (Paras 5-8)

B) Indian Penal Code - Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt - Section 326 IPC - The offence under Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable under Section 320 CrPC. However, the court held that the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are not curtailed by Section 320 CrPC and can be invoked to quash proceedings in appropriate cases. (Paras 5-8)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Inherent Powers - Section 482 CrPC - The court held that the High Court can quash criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences if the parties have genuinely settled the dispute and the chances of conviction are bleak, relying on the principle that the ends of justice are served by quashing. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Section 326 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals are allowed. The order dated 06/03/2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim is set aside. FIR No. 148/2019 registered at Police Station Washim (Rural) and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Law Points

  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Section 326 IPC
  • Section 324 IPC
  • Section 323 IPC
  • Section 504 IPC
  • Section 506 IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 43

Criminal Appeal No.380 of 2020 and Criminal Appeal No.379 of 2020

2020-08-21

S.M. Modak, J.

Shri R.S. Kurekar for the Appellants, Shri B.M. Lonare, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1, Shri D.G. Dhobale for Respondent No.2

Sandip Datta Mohale and others (in Criminal Appeal No.380/2020); Pundlik @ Kundlik Datta Mohale and another (in Criminal Appeal No.379/2020)

State of Maharashtra and Laxman Bhagwat Chavhan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against order of Additional Sessions Judge, Washim refusing to quash FIR for offences under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought quashing of FIR No. 148/2019 and all consequential criminal proceedings.

Filing Reason

The appellants were aggrieved by the trial court's order rejecting their application for quashing of FIR on the ground that the offence under Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable.

Previous Decisions

The Additional Sessions Judge, Washim rejected the application for quashing of FIR on 06/03/2020.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Section 326 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties. Whether the High Court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings for non-compoundable offences.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the complainant does not wish to pursue the case, and therefore the FIR should be quashed. Respondent No.2 (complainant) supported the compromise and did not oppose the quashing. State opposed the quashing on the ground that Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences if the parties have genuinely settled the dispute and the chances of conviction are bleak, as the ends of justice are served by quashing.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute is private in nature and the parties have amicably settled the dispute. The complainant does not wish to pursue the case. The chances of conviction are bleak. The High Court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings.

Procedural History

FIR No. 148/2019 was registered at Police Station Washim (Rural) for offences under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants filed an application before the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. The trial court rejected the application on 06/03/2020. The appellants then filed the present criminal appeals before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 326, 324, 323, 504, 506, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482, 320
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows SLP and Closes Contempt Petition in Matrimonial Criminal Case — High Court Stay Set Aside for Violating Consent Order for Speedy Trial. Trial Directed to Conclude Within Two Months Despite Delays Caused by Recall Applications a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Assault Case Due to Compromise Between Parties — Section 326 IPC Offence Non-Compoundable but Court Exercises Inherent Powers to Quash in Interest of Justice. The court held that the High Court's in...