Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Foreign Nationals in COVID-19 Related Cases for Lack of Evidence of Infection or Visa Violation. The court held that visiting religious places does not violate visa conditions and that prosecution without evidence of infection or visa breach is an abuse of process.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed by foreign nationals (petitioners) against the State of Maharashtra (respondent). The petitioners were prosecuted for offences under Sections 188, 269, 270, and 290 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 37(1)(3) read with 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, Section 11 of the Maharashtra Covid-19 Measures and Rules, 2020, Sections 2, 3, and 4 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, Section 14(b) of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and Section 51(b) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The court examined the material on record and found that there was no evidence to show that the foreign nationals were infected with COVID-19 when they landed in India. Additionally, there was no material indicating that they violated visa conditions; visiting religious places does not constitute a visa violation. The statements of witnesses recorded during investigation did not show that the foreign nationals were propagating religion. The court held that continuing the prosecution under these circumstances would be an abuse of the process of court. Since none of the offences under the aforesaid sections were made out, the charge-sheets were quashed. The judgment was delivered by Justice M.G. Sewlikar, who agreed with the operative part of the judgment of Justice T.V. Nalawade but disagreed with some reasoning, particularly paragraph 35 of the main judgment. The court quashed the charge-sheets in all three petitions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Abuse of Process - Sections 188, 269, 270, 290 IPC, Section 37(1)(3) r/w 135 Maharashtra Police Act, Section 11 Maharashtra COVID-19 Measures Rules, Sections 2,3,4 Epidemic Diseases Act, Section 14(b) Foreigners Act, Section 51(b) Disaster Management Act - The court quashed charge-sheets against foreign nationals as the material did not show they were infected with COVID-19 upon arrival or violated visa conditions. Visiting religious places does not amount to violating visa conditions. Continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process of court. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution of foreign nationals under various penal provisions for alleged COVID-19 violations and visa breaches is sustainable when there is no evidence of infection or visa condition violation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the charge-sheets in all three criminal writ petitions, holding that none of the offences under the aforesaid sections are made out and continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process of court.

Law Points

  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • abuse of process of court
  • lack of prima facie case
  • Sections 188
  • 269
  • 270
  • 290 IPC
  • Section 37(1)(3) r/w 135 Maharashtra Police Act
  • Section 11 Maharashtra COVID-19 Measures Rules
  • Sections 2
  • 3
  • 4 Epidemic Diseases Act
  • Section 14(b) Foreigners Act
  • Section 51(b) Disaster Management Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (08) 10

Criminal Writ Petition No.548 of 2020, Criminal Writ Petition No.554 of 2020, Criminal Writ Petition No.552 of 2020

2020-08-27

M.G. Sewlikar, J.

Konan Kodio Ganstone and others (in WP 548/2020), Hammd Abdulkadar Banota and others (in WP 554/2020), Asalebin Mohammad Noore and others (in WP 552/2020)

State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Jamkhed Police Station (in WP 548/2020), State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Newasa Police Station (in WP 554/2020), State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Ahmednagar Camp Police Station (in WP 552/2020)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petitions seeking quashing of charge-sheets filed against foreign nationals for alleged offences under various penal provisions related to COVID-19 and visa violations.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of charge-sheets and criminal proceedings against the petitioners.

Filing Reason

The petitioners, foreign nationals, were prosecuted for offences under IPC, Maharashtra Police Act, Epidemic Diseases Act, Foreigners Act, and Disaster Management Act in connection with COVID-19 related allegations and alleged visa violations.

Issues

Whether the material on record shows that the foreign nationals were infected with COVID-19 when they landed in India. Whether the foreign nationals violated visa conditions by visiting religious places. Whether the continuation of prosecution amounts to an abuse of process of court.

Submissions/Arguments

The material placed on record does not show that the foreign nationals were infected with Covid-19 when they landed in India. The material does not show that the foreign nationals violated visa conditions; visiting religious places does not amount to violating visa conditions. Statements of witnesses do not show that the foreign nationals were propagating religion.

Ratio Decidendi

Prosecution of foreign nationals under various penal provisions for COVID-19 related offences and visa violations is not sustainable when there is no evidence of infection or violation of visa conditions. Visiting religious places does not constitute a visa violation. Continuing such prosecution amounts to an abuse of process of court.

Judgment Excerpts

The material placed on record does not show that when the foreign nationals landed in India, they were infected with Covid-19. Similarly, the material placed on record does not show that the foreign nationals violated visa conditions. Visiting religious places does not amount to violating visa conditions. Continuation of prosecution against the petitioners in these circumstances would be an abuse of process of Court. Since none of the offences under the aforesaid Sections are made out, the charge-sheets deserve to be quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed three criminal writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking quashing of charge-sheets filed against them. The court heard the petitions and delivered judgment on 27 August 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 188, 269, 270, 290
  • Maharashtra Police Act, 1951: 37(1)(3), 135
  • Maharashtra Covid-19 Measures and Rules, 2020: 11
  • Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897: 2, 3, 4
  • Foreigners Act, 1946: 14(b)
  • Disaster Management Act, 2005: 51(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Former CEO's Suit for Specific Performance of Early Retirement Agreement Against ICICI Bank. Court holds that once ICICI Bank accepted Mrs. Kochhar's early retirement, it could not unilaterally treat her services as terminate...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Foreign Nationals in COVID-19 Related Cases for Lack of Evidence of Infection or Visa Violation. The court held that visiting religious places does not violate visa conditions and that prosecution without evi...