High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal of Statutory Corporation Against Cancellation of Registration Under Section 12AA(3) — CIT Lacked Jurisdiction to Cancel Registration Based on Amendment to Section 2(15) Definition of Charitable Purpose. The court held that the power under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be invoked solely on the ground that the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) was amended, as the registration was granted under Section 12A on 16.12.1983 and continued thereafter.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 82
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Goa Industrial Development Corporation, is a statutory corporation established under the Goa, Daman and Diu Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1965, with the object of securing orderly establishment in industrial areas and industrial estates for rapid and orderly development of industries in Goa. The appellant was granted registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.12.1983, which continued until the impugned orders. On 12.12.2011, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant proposing cancellation of registration under Section 12AA(3) on the ground that the appellant had not fulfilled the conditions laid down under Section 2(15) of the Act, in the context of the proviso to Section 2(15) introduced with effect from 01.04.2009. The appellant responded, raising several grounds including that the two pre-conditions for invoking Section 12AA(3) were not satisfied. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) passed an order on 27.12.2011 cancelling the registration, which was confirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 22.06.2012. The appellant filed a tax appeal before the High Court, which was admitted on 24.09.2013 on two substantial questions of law: (a) whether the Tribunal was justified in comparing the appellant with a private builder and holding that the appellant was carrying on business for profit so as to attract the proviso to Section 2(15); and (b) whether the Tribunal was justified in sustaining the order under Section 12AA(3) particularly on grounds alien to Section 12AA(3). The High Court decided to first address question (b), as if decided in favour of the appellant, question (a) would not need to be considered. The court held that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to exercise powers under Section 12AA(3) on the sole ground that the definition of charitable purpose in Section 2(15) had been amended. The court reasoned that the power under Section 12AA(3) is not meant to review or reassess registration based on subsequent changes in law. Accordingly, the impugned order of the CIT dated 27.12.2011 and the ITAT order dated 22.06.2012 were set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The court did not decide the other substantial question of law.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Charitable Purpose - Registration Cancellation - Section 12AA(3) read with Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The CIT cancelled registration of a statutory corporation under Section 12AA(3) solely on ground that the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) had been amended by insertion of a proviso with effect from 01.04.2009. The High Court held that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 12AA(3) on this ground alone, as the power under Section 12AA(3) is not meant to review or reassess registration based on subsequent changes in law. The impugned order was set aside. (Paras 4, 9-10)

B) Income Tax - Registration under Section 12A - Cancellation - Grounds - Section 12AA(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 - The appellant, a statutory corporation, was granted registration under Section 12A on 16.12.1983. The CIT issued show cause notice on 12.12.2011 proposing cancellation under Section 12AA(3) on ground that the appellant did not fulfill conditions of Section 2(15) as amended. The High Court held that the CIT's action was without jurisdiction because the conditions under Section 2(15) as amended were not applicable at the time of registration and Section 12AA(3) cannot be used to cancel registration for non-fulfillment of conditions that did not exist at the time of grant. (Paras 5-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) had jurisdiction to cancel registration under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, solely on the ground that the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) had been amended by insertion of a proviso with effect from 01.04.2009, when the registration was granted under Section 12A on 16.12.1983 and continued thereafter.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the tax appeal, set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax dated 27.12.2011 and the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 22.06.2012, and restored the registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The substantial question of law at (a) was not decided as it was rendered unnecessary.

Law Points

  • Jurisdiction under Section 12AA(3) of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • cannot be invoked solely on ground of amendment to Section 2(15) definition of charitable purpose
  • Registration under Section 12A cannot be cancelled for non-fulfillment of conditions not existing at time of registration
  • Section 12AA(3) powers are not meant to review or reassess registration based on subsequent changes in law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 104

TAX APPEAL NO. 2 OF 2013

2020-02-04

M.S. Sonak, Smt. M. S. Jawalker

2020:BHC-GOA:284-DB

Mr. Pramod Vaidya, Mr. H.D. Naik (for appellant), Mr. Tulajappa Kalburgi (for respondents)

Goa Industrial Development Corporation

Commissioner of Income Tax, Panaji & Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Assessing Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Tax appeal against cancellation of registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 12AA(3), confirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought setting aside of the order dated 27.12.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax and the order dated 22.06.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and restoration of registration under Section 12A.

Filing Reason

The appellant's registration under Section 12A was cancelled by the CIT on the ground that the appellant did not fulfill the conditions of Section 2(15) as amended by the proviso introduced with effect from 01.04.2009, which the appellant contended was without jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The CIT passed order on 27.12.2011 cancelling registration under Section 12AA(3). The ITAT confirmed the order on 22.06.2012. The appeal was admitted by the High Court on 24.09.2013 on two substantial questions of law.

Issues

Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax had jurisdiction to cancel registration under Section 12AA(3) solely on the ground that the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) had been amended by insertion of a proviso with effect from 01.04.2009. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in sustaining the order under Section 12AA(3) on grounds alien to Section 12AA(3).

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 12AA(3) on the sole ground of amendment to Section 2(15), as the power under Section 12AA(3) is not meant to review or reassess registration based on subsequent changes in law. The respondents argued that the CIT was justified in cancelling registration as the appellant did not fulfill the conditions of Section 2(15) as amended.

Ratio Decidendi

The power under Section 12AA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to cancel registration cannot be invoked solely on the ground that the definition of 'charitable purpose' in Section 2(15) has been amended by insertion of a proviso. The CIT lacked jurisdiction to cancel registration on this ground, as the registration was granted under Section 12A on 16.12.1983 and continued thereafter, and Section 12AA(3) is not meant to review or reassess registration based on subsequent changes in law.

Judgment Excerpts

According to us, if the substantial question of law at (b) above is decided in favour of the appellant, then, there will arise no necessity of deciding the substantial question of law at (a) as above. if we are satisfied that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) lacked jurisdiction to exercise powers under Section 12AA(3) on the sole ground that the definition of charitable purpose in Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (said Act) had been amended, then, on the said ground alone, the impugned order made by the CIT on 27.12.2011 and confirmed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 22.06.2012 will have to be set aside.

Procedural History

The appellant was granted registration under Section 12A on 16.12.1983. On 12.12.2011, a show cause notice was issued proposing cancellation under Section 12AA(3). The CIT passed order on 27.12.2011 cancelling registration. The appellant appealed to ITAT, which confirmed the order on 22.06.2012. The appellant then filed a tax appeal before the High Court, which was admitted on 24.09.2013 on two substantial questions of law. The High Court heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 04.02.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 2(15), 12A, 12AA(3)
  • Goa, Daman and Diu Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1965:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Certificate. Court Finds Suppression of Material Facts and Interpolation in Old School Record Vitiates Claim, Parity Claim Rej...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Registrar in Co-operative Societies Act Arbitration Dispute, Setting Aside High Court Order Appointing Substitute Arbitrator. High Court Erred in Holding Registrar Functus Officio and Invoking Arbitration Act Section 46; Act Pro...