High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Deceased Coolies Were 'Third Parties' Not 'Gratuitous Passengers' in Goods Vehicle. The court held that coolies travelling in a goods vehicle with goods are not gratuitous passengers and are covered under the insurance policy as third parties under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two first appeals filed by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the award of the Claim Tribunal in respect of the death of two coolies, Naresh and Kishor, who were travelling in a goods vehicle (Tata 909 bearing registration no. MH/33/4117) along with paddy bags. The vehicle turned turtle due to rash and negligent driving, resulting in the death of both coolies. The legal heirs of the deceased filed claim petitions before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded compensation. The Insurance Company appealed, contending that the deceased were gratuitous passengers and thus not covered under the insurance policy. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the deceased were coolies travelling along with the goods, and therefore they are not gratuitous passengers but third parties covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court dismissed both appeals, affirming the Tribunal's award and directing the Insurance Company to pay the compensation.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Third Party Insurance - Gratuitous Passenger - Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The issue was whether coolies travelling in a goods vehicle along with paddy bags are gratuitous passengers or third parties. The court held that since the coolies were travelling along with goods, they are not gratuitous passengers and are covered as third parties under the insurance policy. The insurer is liable to pay compensation. (Paras 2-5)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Goods Vehicle - Coolie - Coverage - Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court reasoned that the deceased were coolies travelling in the goods vehicle along with the goods, and thus they are not gratuitous passengers. The insurance policy covers third parties, and the insurer cannot avoid liability. The appeals were dismissed. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deceased coolies travelling in a goods vehicle along with goods are 'gratuitous passengers' or 'third parties' for the purpose of insurance coverage under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both appeals are dismissed. The judgment and award passed by the Claim Tribunal are confirmed. The Insurance Company is directed to pay the compensation amount to the claimants.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 147
  • Third party
  • Gratuitous passenger
  • Goods vehicle
  • Coolie
  • Insurance liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 165

First Appeal No. 1283 of 2019 with First Appeal No. 1284 of 2019

2020-01-28

M. G. Giratkar

Ms. Anita Mategaonkar for appellant, Shri P.P. Pendke for respondent nos. 2 to 6 (in FA 1283/2019) and respondent nos. 2 to 4 (in FA 1284/2019)

National Insurance Company Ltd.

Dilip S/o Tahalumal Kukreja and others (in FA 1283/2019); Dilip S/o Tahalumal Kukreja and others (in FA 1284/2019)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Motor accident claims appeals by insurance company against award of compensation to legal heirs of deceased coolies.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought to set aside the award of compensation by the Claim Tribunal.

Filing Reason

Insurance company contended that deceased were gratuitous passengers not covered under the policy.

Previous Decisions

Claim Tribunal awarded compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased.

Issues

Whether the deceased coolies travelling in a goods vehicle along with goods are 'gratuitous passengers' or 'third parties' under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant/Insurance Company argued that the deceased were gratuitous passengers and thus not covered under the insurance policy. Respondents/Claimants argued that the deceased were coolies travelling along with goods and hence are third parties covered under the policy.

Ratio Decidendi

Coolies travelling in a goods vehicle along with goods are not gratuitous passengers; they are third parties covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the insurer is liable to pay compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

Both were working as a coolie in the said vehicle. Paddy bags were loaded in the said vehicle. The Claim Tribunal passed the award. The Insurance Company has challenged the award on the ground that the deceased were gratuitous passengers. The deceased were coolies travelling along with goods. Therefore, they are not gratuitous passengers. The Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation.

Procedural History

The claim petitions were filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which awarded compensation. The Insurance Company filed first appeals before the High Court challenging the award.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Dissenting Members in Cooperative Housing Society Redevelopment Dispute — Majority Decision Upheld. Court holds that minority members cannot stall redevelopment process approved by 80 out of 88 members, and obj...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Deceased Coolies Were 'Third Parties' Not 'Gratuitous Passengers' in Goods Vehicle. The court held that coolies travelling in a goods vehicle with goods...