Bombay High Court Partially Allows Husband's Revision and Wife's Writ in Maintenance Enhancement Case — Daughter's Maintenance Limited to Majority Under Section 125 CrPC. The court upheld enhanced maintenance for wife but reduced daughter's maintenance and limited it to majority, as daughter was major and not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by the husband, Dr. Ashok Pudale, challenging the enhancement of maintenance granted by the Family Court, Nanded, in Petition No.E-93 of 2014 and Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.07 of 2015 dated 11-08-2017. The wife, Smt. Ashwini Pudale, and daughter, Shruti Pudale, also filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the same order insofar as it limited the daughter's maintenance till her majority. The background is that maintenance was initially granted at Rs.400/- per month each in 1996, increased to Rs.1,250/- per month in 2004. In 2014, the wife and daughter sought enhancement due to increased prices and the daughter's higher education, while the husband sought cancellation. The Family Court enhanced maintenance to Rs.8,000/- per month for the wife and Rs.5,000/- per month for the daughter, but only till the daughter attained majority. The husband argued that the enhancement was excessive and that the daughter, being major, was not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The wife argued that the daughter should get maintenance beyond majority as she was studying. The High Court analyzed the provisions of Section 125 CrPC, noting that maintenance for a major daughter is not permissible unless she is unable to maintain herself due to physical or mental abnormality. Since the daughter was major and not disabled, the High Court held that the Family Court erred in granting maintenance beyond majority. However, considering the husband's salary of Rs.84,221/- per month and the wife's needs, the High Court upheld the wife's maintenance at Rs.8,000/- per month but reduced the daughter's maintenance to Rs.3,000/- per month, limited till her majority. The High Court partly allowed both the revision and the writ petition, modifying the Family Court's order accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance - Section 125 CrPC - Enhancement of Maintenance - The Family Court enhanced maintenance from Rs.1,250/- per month to Rs.8,000/- per month for wife and Rs.5,000/- per month for daughter based on increased salary of husband and rise in prices. The High Court upheld the enhancement for wife but reduced daughter's maintenance to Rs.3,000/- per month and limited it till her majority, as daughter was major and not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. (Paras 2-15)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Maintenance for Major Daughter - Section 125 CrPC - The daughter was major at the time of application; therefore, she is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The High Court held that the Family Court erred in granting maintenance beyond majority. (Paras 10-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court was justified in enhancing maintenance for the wife and daughter, and whether the daughter is entitled to maintenance beyond the age of majority under Section 125 CrPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court partly allowed both the Criminal Revision Application and the Criminal Writ Petition. The Family Court's order was modified: wife's maintenance of Rs.8,000/- per month was upheld; daughter's maintenance was reduced to Rs.3,000/- per month and limited till her attainment of majority.

Law Points

  • Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
  • Enhancement of maintenance
  • Maintenance for major daughter
  • Change in circumstances
  • Quantum of maintenance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (01) 4

Criminal Revision Application No.243 of 2017 and Criminal Writ Petition No.1597 of 2017

2020-01-09

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.

Mr. A. S. Barlota for applicant in Criminal Revision Application No.243 of 2017 and for respondent in Criminal Writ Petition No.1597 of 2017; Mr. A. M. Gaikwad for respondents in Criminal Revision Application No.243 of 2017 and for petitioners in Criminal Writ Petition No.1597 of 2017

Dr. Ashok s/o Pundlik Pudale (in Criminal Revision Application No.243 of 2017); Smt. Ashwini divorcee w/o Ashok Pudale and Shruti d/o Ashok Pudale (in Criminal Writ Petition No.1597 of 2017)

Smt. Ashwini divorcee w/o Ashok Pudale and Shruti d/o Ashok Pudale (in Criminal Revision Application No.243 of 2017); Dr. Ashok s/o Pundlik Pudale (in Criminal Writ Petition No.1597 of 2017)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Revision Application challenging enhancement of maintenance and Criminal Writ Petition challenging limitation of maintenance to majority.

Remedy Sought

Husband sought reduction of enhanced maintenance; wife and daughter sought maintenance for daughter beyond majority.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the Family Court's order dated 11-08-2017 enhancing maintenance for wife and daughter but limiting daughter's maintenance till majority.

Previous Decisions

Maintenance initially granted at Rs.400/- per month each in 1996, increased to Rs.1,250/- per month in 2004.

Issues

Whether the Family Court was justified in enhancing maintenance for the wife and daughter. Whether the daughter is entitled to maintenance beyond the age of majority under Section 125 CrPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Husband argued that the enhancement was excessive and that the daughter, being major, is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. Wife argued that the daughter is studying and needs maintenance beyond majority.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 125 CrPC, maintenance for a major daughter is not permissible unless she is unable to maintain herself due to physical or mental abnormality. The daughter being major and not disabled, the Family Court erred in granting maintenance beyond majority. However, considering the husband's salary and wife's needs, enhancement for wife was justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The daughter was major at the time of application; therefore, she is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. The Family Court erred in granting maintenance beyond majority.

Procedural History

Maintenance initially granted in 1996, enhanced in 2004. In 2014, wife and daughter filed for enhancement; husband filed for cancellation. Family Court passed order on 11-08-2017. Both parties challenged the order in the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Husband's Revision and Wife's Writ in Maintenance Enhancement Case — Daughter's Maintenance Limited to Majority Under Section 125 CrPC. The court upheld enhanced maintenance for wife but reduced daughter's mainten...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Award in Subsea Pipeline Contract — No Arbitrariness Found in ONGC's Decision to Award Contract to Higher Bidder. Court held that the decision of the technical evaluation committee to rej...