Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Forwarding Facebook Post Under Section 505(2) IPC and Section 67 IT Act — Lack of Mens Rea. Mere forwarding of a post without reading it does not constitute an offence under Section 505(2) IPC or Section 67 IT Act as the essential ingredient of intent to cause harm is missing.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Pawandeep @ Pawan S/o Chotulal Yadav, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 520 of 2018 registered at Gadchandur Police Station for offences under Section 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Gaus Isak Siddiki, alleging that the applicant forwarded a Facebook post that hurt the sentiments of the Muslim community. The applicant contended that he was not the author of the post and had forwarded it without reading it properly, claiming it was a mistake. He argued that the essential ingredients of the offences were not made out. The Investigating Officer filed a reply stating that investigation revealed commission of the crime. Respondent No. 2 also filed a reply supporting the FIR. The court examined the contents of the post and found that it referred to a specific individual, Tarik Anwar, and was not intended to create enmity between communities. The court held that the element of mens rea was absent as the applicant had not read the post before forwarding it. Consequently, the court quashed the FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom, allowing the application.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Section 505(2) IPC and Section 67 IT Act - Mens Rea - The applicant forwarded a Facebook post without reading it properly. The court held that the essential ingredient of mens rea is missing for both offences. The post did not intend to create enmity or hatred between communities. The FIR was quashed to prevent abuse of process. (Paras 2-6)

B) Information Technology Act - Section 67 - Forwarding of Obscene Material - The court held that mere forwarding of a post without knowledge of its content does not satisfy the requirement of 'publishing or transmitting' obscene material under Section 67 of the IT Act. The applicant's act was a mistake and lacked criminal intent. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the mere forwarding of a Facebook post without reading it or intending to cause harm attracts the offences under Section 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and quashed the FIR No. 520 of 2018 registered with Gadchandur Police Station and all proceedings arising therefrom.

Law Points

  • Mens rea essential for offence under Section 505(2) IPC
  • Forwarding without reading does not constitute offence under Section 67 IT Act
  • Quashing of FIR when ingredients not made out
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 149

Criminal Application (APL) No. 962 of 2018

2021-12-07

A. S. Chandurkar, G. A. Sanap

Mr. A. S. Ambatkar for applicant, Ms S. S. Jachak for respondent No.1, Mr V. R. Thote for respondent No.2

Pawandeep @ Pawan S/o. Chotulal Yadav

State of Maharashtra and Gaus Isak Siddiki

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 520/2018 and all proceedings arising therefrom

Filing Reason

Applicant forwarded a Facebook post without reading it, leading to registration of FIR for offences under Section 505(2) IPC and Section 67 IT Act

Issues

Whether the ingredients of Section 505(2) IPC are made out against the applicant? Whether the ingredients of Section 67 IT Act are made out against the applicant?

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that he is not the author of the post and forwarded it without reading it properly, lacking mens rea. Respondent No. 2 argued that the post hurt sentiments of Muslim community and investigation revealed commission of crime.

Ratio Decidendi

The essential ingredient of mens rea is missing for offences under Section 505(2) IPC and Section 67 IT Act when the accused merely forwarded a Facebook post without reading it and without intent to cause harm or create enmity.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant forwarded and circulated the said facebook post. It is his case that before forwarding the post on the facebook account of the others he did not read the same properly. the fundamental ingredients of Section 505 (2) of the I.P.C. and Section 67 of the I. T. Act have not been made out.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 01.10.2018; applicant filed Criminal Application (APL) No. 962 of 2018 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench; heard and decided on 07.12.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 505(2)
  • Information Technology Act, 2000: 67
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanctioning Authority's Admission of Using Draft Sanction Without Independent Application of Mind Renders Prosecution Void Under Section 19 of Prev...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Forwarding Facebook Post Under Section 505(2) IPC and Section 67 IT Act — Lack of Mens Rea. Mere forwarding of a post without reading it does not constitute an offence under Section 505(2) IPC or Section 67 IT Act ...