Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for MEIS Benefits on Cashew Kernel Exports. Exporters entitled to MEIS reward at 5% rate for exports made after 01.11.2017, even if shipping bills were filed before that date.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ajanta Industries, a proprietorship concern engaged in manufacturing and exporting cashew kernels, sought to avail the benefit of the Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) under the foreign trade policy. Under the policy, exporters are entitled to a reward of 3% of the net export value in the form of Duty Credit Scrips, which was increased to 5% with effect from 01.11.2017. The petitioner exported cashew kernels to various countries and filed shipping bills for the same. However, the respondents, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs and the Director General of Foreign Trade, denied the enhanced 5% benefit on the ground that the shipping bills were filed prior to 01.11.2017, even though the actual exports (as evidenced by the bills of lading) took place after that date. The petitioner argued that the date of export should be the date of the bill of lading, not the date of filing of the shipping bill. The court examined the relevant provisions of the foreign trade policy, particularly paragraph 3.04 and 3.14, and noted that the entitlement under MEIS is based on exports of notified goods to notified markets, and the basis of calculation is the realized FOB value as given in the shipping bills. The court held that the date of export is the date when the goods are actually shipped, i.e., the date of the bill of lading, and not the date of filing of the shipping bill. Since the exports in question were made after 01.11.2017, the petitioner was entitled to the enhanced rate of 5%. The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant the MEIS benefit at the rate of 5% to the petitioner for the exports made after 01.11.2017.

Headnote

A) Customs and Foreign Trade - MEIS Entitlement - Date of Export - The dispute pertains to the rate of MEIS reward applicable to exports of cashew kernels. The court held that the date of export is the date of the bill of lading, not the date of filing of the shipping bill. Therefore, exports made after 01.11.2017 are entitled to the enhanced rate of 5% even if shipping bills were filed earlier. (Paras 2-6)

B) Foreign Trade Policy - Interpretation - Beneficial Construction - The court applied the principle of beneficial construction to interpret the foreign trade policy in favor of the exporter. The policy should be construed liberally to promote exports. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to MEIS benefit at the rate of 5% for exports made after 01.11.2017, even though the shipping bills were filed prior to that date.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant the MEIS benefit at the rate of 5% to the petitioner for the exports made after 01.11.2017.

Law Points

  • MEIS entitlement
  • date of export
  • shipping bill filing date
  • foreign trade policy interpretation
  • beneficial construction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (12) 120

WRIT PETITION NO.20 OF 2021

2021-12-01

REVATI MOHITE DERE, M. S. JAWALKAR

2021:BHC-GOA:1340-DB

Mr. V.P. Thali, Advocate for the Petitioner; MR. Pravin Faldessai, Assistant Solicitor General of India for Respondents No.2 & 3

Ajanta Industries

The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, The Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, The Director General of Foreign Trade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to grant MEIS benefit at enhanced rate of 5% for exports made after 01.11.2017.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to grant MEIS benefit at 5% rate for exports made after 01.11.2017.

Filing Reason

Respondents denied enhanced MEIS benefit on the ground that shipping bills were filed prior to 01.11.2017, though exports occurred after that date.

Issues

Whether the date of export for MEIS purposes is the date of filing of the shipping bill or the date of the bill of lading? Whether the petitioner is entitled to the enhanced MEIS rate of 5% for exports made after 01.11.2017?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the date of export is the date of the bill of lading, and since exports were made after 01.11.2017, the enhanced rate of 5% applies. Respondents contended that the shipping bills were filed prior to 01.11.2017, and therefore the rate of 3% should apply.

Ratio Decidendi

The date of export for MEIS purposes is the date of the bill of lading, not the date of filing of the shipping bill. Exports made after the effective date of enhancement are entitled to the higher rate.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner, who seeks to avail the benefit of merchandise export from India Scheme (MEIS) envisaged under the foreign trade policy by which exporters are entitled to export benefit of 3% of the net export in the form of Duty Credits Scrips which can be used for the payment of duty and are also transferable. The said benefit was further increased to 5% of the net exports with effect from 01.11.2017.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the denial of enhanced MEIS benefit. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 01.12.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Foreign Trade Policy: Paragraph 3.04, Paragraph 3.14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for MEIS Benefits on Cashew Kernel Exports. Exporters entitled to MEIS reward at 5% rate for exports made after 01.11.2017, even if shipping bills were filed before that date.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.