Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused No.2 in Gang Rape Case Under Section 376(G) IPC — Conviction Upheld Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix and Corroborating Medical Evidence. The court found the prosecutrix's evidence trustworthy and the medical report consistent with the allegation of gang rape.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from an incident on 22 July 1997, where the prosecutrix, a resident of Wadachiwadi, went to village Chikhali to offer Naivedya to Goddess Mariai-Laxmi. After offering, she was waiting at Chikhali Phata for a bus when accused No.1 (Anil Vishnu Patil) approached her and falsely told her that her nephew was at his Dhaba and called her. She accompanied him to the Dhaba, where accused No.2 (Vilas Namdeo Mate) was present. There, both accused persons committed gang rape upon her. The trial court convicted both accused under Section 376(G) IPC and sentenced them to five years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.3,000 each. Accused No.1 died during the appeal, so his appeal abated. The High Court heard the appeal of accused No.2. The court considered the testimony of the prosecutrix, which it found credible and consistent, and noted that medical evidence corroborated the sexual assault. The court dismissed the appeal of accused No.2, upholding his conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Gang Rape - Section 376(G) IPC - Credibility of Prosecutrix - The court examined whether the testimony of the prosecutrix was reliable and corroborated by medical and other evidence. Held that the prosecutrix's evidence was trustworthy and consistent, and the medical evidence supported the prosecution case. (Paras 1-5)

B) Criminal Procedure - Abatement of Appeal - Death of Appellant - The appeal filed by appellant No.1 abated due to his death during the pendency of the appeal. (Para 2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellants under Section 376(G) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal of appellant No.1 abated. The appeal of appellant No.2 is dismissed. The conviction and sentence under Section 376(G) IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Gang rape
  • Section 376(G) IPC
  • credibility of prosecutrix
  • corroboration of evidence
  • medical evidence
  • dying declaration
  • abatement of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (08) 41

Criminal Appeal No. 372 of 1998 with Criminal Suo-Moto Application No.2 of 1998

2021-08-17

Prasanna B. Varale, N.R. Borkar

2021:BHC-AS:10198-DB

V.M. Throat for Appellant No.2, Mrs. Geeta P. Mulekar, APP for Respondent-State

Anil Vishnu Patil (Abated), Vilas Namdeo Mate

The State of Maharashtra, Chababai Dadarao Chaudhari

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for gang rape under Section 376(G) IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant No.2 sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellants were convicted for gang rape and sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment and fine.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (II Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur) convicted the appellants on 26.2.1998 in Sessions Case No. 239 of 1997.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 376(G) IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of the prosecutrix and medical evidence.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant No.2 argued that the evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction. The State argued that the prosecutrix's testimony was credible and corroborated by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The testimony of the prosecutrix in a rape case is credible and can be the sole basis for conviction if it inspires confidence. In this case, the prosecutrix's evidence was consistent and corroborated by medical evidence, establishing the offence of gang rape under Section 376(G) IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal takes an exception to the judgment and order dated 26.2.1998 passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 239 of 1997. Appellant No.1 / accused No.1 died during the pendency of the appeal.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellants on 26.2.1998. They filed Criminal Appeal No. 372 of 1998. During the appeal, appellant No.1 died, and his appeal abated. The High Court heard the appeal of appellant No.2 and dismissed it on 17.8.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376(G)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim of Additional District Judge. Multiplier of 13 applied and 50% future prospects added, enhancing award from Rs.3,04,272/- to Rs.7,00,000/- with 6% interest.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused No.2 in Gang Rape Case Under Section 376(G) IPC — Conviction Upheld Based on Credible Testimony of Prosecutrix and Corroborating Medical Evidence. The court found the prosecutrix's evidence trustworthy ...