Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Six-Month Waiting Period Under Section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for Mutual Consent Divorce. Irretrievable breakdown of marriage and settlement of all disputes justify relaxation of mandatory cooling-off period.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-husband and respondent-wife were married on 22nd April 2015. Their temperament seldom matched, leading to marital discord. The wife instituted proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which she later withdrew. The husband filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights, which was decreed in November 2019. However, the parties did not resume cohabitation. They eventually decided to separate by mutual consent and filed a joint petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act before the Family Court at Pune. The Family Court, by order dated 16th March 2021, rejected the waiver of the six-month waiting period under Section 13-B(2) and directed the parties to wait for six months from the date of the first motion. Aggrieved, the husband filed the present writ petition. The sole legal issue was whether the six-month period under Section 13-B(2) is mandatory or can be relaxed in exceptional circumstances. The petitioner argued that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, the parties had been living separately for over two years, and all disputes including permanent alimony of Rs. 5,00,000 had been settled. The respondent supported the petition. The court, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, held that the waiting period is directory and can be waived where the marriage has irretrievably broken down, the parties have settled all disputes, and there is no chance of reconciliation. The court found that the parties had been living separately since November 2019, the wife had withdrawn all proceedings, and a settlement of Rs. 5,00,000 had been paid. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition, set aside the Family Court's order, and granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent, waiving the six-month waiting period.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Mutual Consent Divorce - Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Mandatory Waiting Period - Waiver - The court considered whether the six-month cooling-off period under Section 13-B(2) is mandatory or can be relaxed in exceptional circumstances. Held that the period is directory and can be waived where the marriage has irretrievably broken down, parties have settled all disputes, and there is no chance of reconciliation. (Paras 3-6)

B) Family Law - Mutual Consent Divorce - Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Irretrievable Breakdown - The court held that where the marriage has irretrievably broken down and the parties have been living separately for a sufficient period, the waiting period can be dispensed with to avoid further agony. (Paras 5-6)

C) Family Law - Mutual Consent Divorce - Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Compromise and Settlement - The court noted that the parties had settled all disputes including permanent alimony of Rs. 5,00,000, and the wife had withdrawn all proceedings. Held that such settlement indicates no possibility of reconciliation, warranting waiver of the waiting period. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Family Court's order dated 16th March 2021, and granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, waiving the six-month waiting period under Section 13-B(2).

Law Points

  • Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • mandatory waiting period
  • waiver in exceptional circumstances
  • irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • mutual consent divorce
  • Article 142 of the Constitution of India
  • inherent powers of court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (07) 17

Writ Petition No. 5822 of 2021

2021-07-03

Sandeep K. Shinde J.

Mr. Rathi Swapnil S. for Petitioner, Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar for Respondent

Pritam Vijaykumar Dargad

Sujata Pritam Dargad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the Family Court's order refusing to waive the six-month waiting period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for mutual consent divorce.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought waiver of the six-month waiting period and immediate decree of divorce by mutual consent.

Filing Reason

The Family Court at Pune rejected the joint application for waiver of the six-month waiting period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Previous Decisions

The Family Court at Pune, by order dated 16th March 2021, rejected the waiver application and directed the parties to wait for six months from the date of the first motion.

Issues

Whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, parties had been living separately for over two years, all disputes including permanent alimony of Rs. 5,00,000 had been settled, and there was no chance of reconciliation, thus the waiting period should be waived. Respondent supported the petition and consented to the waiver of the waiting period.

Ratio Decidendi

The six-month waiting period under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directory and not mandatory. It can be waived by the court in exceptional circumstances where the marriage has irretrievably broken down, the parties have settled all disputes, and there is no possibility of reconciliation. The court has inherent powers to do complete justice and avoid further agony to the parties.

Judgment Excerpts

Solitary, question that emanates for consideration in this Petition is; Whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act) for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations ? In the case of Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur (2017) 8 SCC 746, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the period of six months under Section 13-B(2) is not mandatory but directory and can be waived in exceptional circumstances. Considering the facts of the case, the marriage has irretrievably broken down, the parties have settled all disputes, and there is no chance of reconciliation. Hence, the waiting period is waived.

Procedural History

The parties married on 22nd April 2015. The wife filed proceedings under Section 125 CrPC and Domestic Violence Act, which were withdrawn. The husband filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, decreed in November 2019. The parties filed a joint petition under Section 13-B for mutual consent divorce before the Family Court at Pune. The Family Court rejected the waiver of the six-month waiting period on 16th March 2021. The husband filed the present writ petition on 3rd July 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13-B, Section 13-B(2), Section 9
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Six-Month Waiting Period Under Section 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for Mutual Consent Divorce. Irretrievable breakdown of marriage and settlement of all disputes justify relaxation of mandatory cooling-off p...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned cons...