Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Corporator for Non-Production of Caste Validity Certificate During COVID-19 Lockdown. The court held that the period of lockdown must be excluded from the 12-month period under Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, in light of the Supreme Court's suo moto order extending limitation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Kalmati Ramkrupal Yadav, was elected as a member of the Chandrapur Municipal Corporation from a seat reserved for Other Backward Class (women category) on 23 June 2019. As per Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, a candidate contesting from a reserved seat must submit a Caste Certificate and a Validity Certificate from the Caste Scrutiny Committee along with the nomination paper. The proviso to Section 5B allows a candidate who has applied for verification of the caste certificate to contest, provided the Validity Certificate is produced within twelve months from the date of election, failing which the election shall be deemed to have been void. The petitioner had applied for verification but did not obtain the Validity Certificate within the twelve-month period ending on 23 June 2020. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the nationwide lockdown imposed in March 2020, the Caste Scrutiny Committee was not functioning. The respondent Municipal Corporation issued an order on 23 June 2021 disqualifying the petitioner and declaring her seat vacant. The petitioner challenged this order, arguing that the period of lockdown should be excluded from the twelve-month period, relying on the suo moto order of the Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020, which extended limitation periods from 15 March 2020 until further orders. The court agreed with the petitioner, holding that the lockdown period could not be counted against her. The court quashed the disqualification order and directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to continue as a member of the Municipal Corporation. The court also directed the Caste Scrutiny Committee to expedite the verification of the petitioner's caste certificate.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Disqualification - Caste Validity Certificate - Section 5B Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - The petitioner, elected as a member of Chandrapur Municipal Corporation from a reserved OBC (women) category, failed to produce a Caste Validity Certificate within 12 months as required by the proviso to Section 5B. The respondent disqualified her. The court held that the period of COVID-19 lockdown (March 2020 onwards) must be excluded from the 12-month period, relying on the Supreme Court's suo moto order extending limitation periods. The disqualification order was quashed and the petitioner was reinstated. (Paras 3-22)

B) Limitation Act - Extension of Time - COVID-19 Lockdown - Suo Moto Order of Supreme Court - The Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 directed that the period of limitation for filing any suit, appeal, or application shall stand extended from 15th March 2020 until further orders. The court applied this principle to the statutory period under Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, holding that the lockdown period cannot be counted against the petitioner. (Paras 10-15)

C) Interpretation of Statutes - Beneficial Construction - Section 5B Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - The proviso to Section 5B is a beneficial provision allowing candidates from reserved categories to contest elections even if they have not obtained a Validity Certificate, subject to producing it within 12 months. The court interpreted this provision liberally in favor of the elected member, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, to avoid a harsh and unintended consequence. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the period of COVID-19 lockdown can be excluded from the 12-month period prescribed under the proviso to Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 for producing a Caste Validity Certificate, in light of the suo moto order of the Supreme Court extending limitation periods.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order dated 23/06/2021, and directed the respondent to allow the petitioner to continue as a member of the Chandrapur Municipal Corporation. The court also directed the Caste Scrutiny Committee to expedite the verification of the petitioner's caste certificate.

Law Points

  • Caste Validity Certificate
  • Disqualification
  • Extension of Time
  • COVID-19 Lockdown
  • Suo Moto Order of Supreme Court
  • Section 5B Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act
  • 1949
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (06) 53

Writ Petition No. 1904 of 2020

2021-06-24

Manish Pitale, J.

Mr. A. A. Dhawas for petitioner, Mr. M. I. Dhatrak for respondent

Smt. Kalmati Ramkrupal Yadav

Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification order passed by Municipal Corporation for non-production of Caste Validity Certificate within the prescribed period.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the disqualification order dated 23/06/2021 and continuation as member of the Municipal Corporation.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified for failing to produce Caste Validity Certificate within 12 months of election, but she claimed the COVID-19 lockdown period should be excluded.

Previous Decisions

The respondent Municipal Corporation passed an order on 23/06/2021 disqualifying the petitioner and declaring her seat vacant.

Issues

Whether the period of COVID-19 lockdown can be excluded from the 12-month period under the proviso to Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 for producing a Caste Validity Certificate. Whether the suo moto order of the Supreme Court extending limitation applies to statutory periods under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that due to COVID-19 lockdown, the Caste Scrutiny Committee was not functioning, and the period of lockdown should be excluded as per Supreme Court's suo moto order. Respondent argued that Section 5B is mandatory and the petitioner failed to produce the Validity Certificate within 12 months, hence disqualification is automatic.

Ratio Decidendi

The period of COVID-19 lockdown from March 2020 onwards must be excluded from the 12-month period prescribed under the proviso to Section 5B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, in light of the Supreme Court's suo moto order extending limitation periods. The disqualification order based on non-production of Caste Validity Certificate during the lockdown period is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The spread of COVID-19 virus and consequent countrywide lockdown imposed in March 2020 has led to a situation wherein the petitioner claims that she has been wrongly held to be disqualified from holding the elected post of member of the Chandrapur Municipal Corporation. As per Section 5B of the aforesaid Act, a person contesting election for a reserved seat is mandatorily required to submit Caste Certificate issued by the Competent Authority, as also Validity Certificate issued by the Caste Scrutiny Committee along with the nomination paper. The Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020 directed that the period of limitation for filing any suit, appeal, or application shall stand extended from 15th March 2020 until further orders.

Procedural History

The petitioner was elected on 23/06/2019. The respondent issued a disqualification order on 23/06/2021. The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1904 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the disqualification. The court reserved judgment on 18/06/2021 and pronounced on 24/06/2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949: Section 5B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Revision Against Discharge of Accused in POCSO Case — No Prima Facie Case of Sexual Assault Established. Court held that the allegations did not constitute penetrative sexual assault under Section 3 of the PO...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Insurer Held Liable Despite Absence of Driving License, as Owner Failed to Exercise Due Diligence. The Court restored the Tribunal's award holding the insurer jointly liab...