Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Appeal in Inventory Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Summary Inquiry Requirement. Section 400(5) of Goa Succession Act, 2012 Mandates Summary Inquiry Before Disposal of Objections; Order Set Aside and Matter Remanded.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order dated 31.08.2019 passed by the Inventory Court disposing of objections raised at Exhibits 46, 49, and 54 by interested parties in inventory proceedings under the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012. The appellants, who were interested parties, contended that the Inventory Court failed to hold a summary inquiry as required under Section 400(5) of the Act before disposing of the objections. The respondents argued that inquiry is only necessary for substantial objections and that the objections were frivolous. The High Court held that Section 400(5) mandates at least a summary inquiry before disposal of objections, and since no inquiry was held, the impugned order was set aside. Additionally, the Court found that the Inventory Court's reasoning overlooked material on record and did not consider several contentions raised by the appellants. The matter was remanded to the Inventory Court for fresh consideration after holding a summary inquiry and considering all objections on merits. The appeal was allowed, and the civil application was disposed of.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Inventory Proceedings - Summary Inquiry - Section 400(5) of The Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 - The Inventory Court disposed of objections without holding any summary inquiry as mandated by Section 400(5) of the Act. The High Court held that the provision contemplates at least a summary inquiry before disposal of objections, and the impugned order was set aside on this ground alone. (Paras 4, 7)

B) Succession Law - Inventory Proceedings - Consideration of Objections - Section 400(5) of The Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 - The High Court noted that even otherwise, the reasoning of the Inventory Court was vulnerable as it overlooked material on record and did not consider most contentions raised by the appellants. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after holding a summary inquiry. (Paras 5, 7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Inventory Court was required to hold a summary inquiry under Section 400(5) of the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 before disposing of objections raised by interested parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order dated 31.08.2019 set aside. Matter remanded to Inventory Court for fresh consideration after holding summary inquiry and considering all objections on merits. Civil Application disposed of.

Law Points

  • Summary inquiry mandatory before disposal of objections in inventory proceedings
  • Section 400(5) of Goa Succession
  • Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act
  • 2012
  • Inventory Court must consider all objections on merits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (06) 43

Appeal from Order No. 64 of 2019 with Civil Application No. 217 of 2019

2021-06-16

M. S. Sonak

2021:BHC-GOA:669

J. P. Mulgaonkar (Senior Advocate) with Rupa Banaulikar for Appellants; Sudin Usgaonkar (Senior Advocate) with Tanvi Ghanekar for Respondents

Mario Aleixo Guadalupe da Costa & Ors.

Jose Aleixo Guilherme da Costa & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Inventory Court disposing of objections in inventory proceedings under the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the order dated 31.08.2019 and remand for holding summary inquiry.

Filing Reason

Inventory Court disposed of objections without holding summary inquiry as required under Section 400(5) of the Act.

Previous Decisions

Inventory Court order dated 31.08.2019 disposing of objections at Exhibits 46, 49, and 54.

Issues

Whether the Inventory Court was required to hold a summary inquiry under Section 400(5) of the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 before disposing of objections.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants: Section 400(5) mandates at least a summary inquiry before disposal of objections; no inquiry was held; reasoning of Inventory Court overlooked material on record. Respondents: Inquiry required only for substantial objections, not frivolous ones; objections were duly considered.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 400(5) of the Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 mandates that the Inventory Court must hold at least a summary inquiry before disposing of objections raised by interested parties in inventory proceedings. Failure to do so renders the order liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 400(5) of The Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012 (the said Act) contemplates holding atleast a summary inquiry before the disposal of objections. the impugned order is liable to be set aside on this ground alone.

Procedural History

Inventory Court passed order dated 31.08.2019 disposing of objections at Exhibits 46, 49, and 54. Appellants filed Appeal from Order No. 64 of 2019 against that order. The appeal was admitted and taken up for final disposal with consent of parties.

Acts & Sections

  • The Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012: 400(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Termination for Non-Payment of Minimum Salary Under MEPS Act. Petitioner appointed as Assistant Teacher from 1988, terminated in 1989 but reappointed yearly; held entitled to reinstatement with cont...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial cou...