Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Rape FIR Despite Settlement. Non-Compoundable Offences Under Sections 376 and 313 IPC Cannot Be Quashed on Compromise as They Are Against Society.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. I-0616 of 2019 registered at Ambarnath Police Station, Thane, for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 313 (causing miscarriage without consent), and 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The petitioner and the second respondent (victim) submitted that they had amicably settled the dispute and that the victim had filed an affidavit stating her voluntary consent to the quashing. The victim was present in court and confirmed the settlement. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition, arguing that the allegations were serious, involving rape and abortion, and that such offences have a societal impact. The court, after considering the rival submissions and perusing the FIR and original record, held that the offences under Sections 376 and 313 IPC are non-compoundable and heinous, and quashing on the basis of compromise would be against public policy. The court relied on the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat, and State of M.P. v. Laxmi Narayan, which hold that while the High Court has inherent powers to quash proceedings, such powers should not be exercised for serious offences like rape. The court dismissed the petition, refusing to quash the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Inherent Powers - Sections 482 CrPC - Non-compoundable Offences - The court considered whether an FIR for rape and abortion can be quashed on compromise. Held that offences under Sections 376 and 313 IPC are serious and against society, and quashing on settlement is not permissible (Paras 7-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an FIR registered for offences under Sections 376, 313 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The FIR No. I-0616 of 2019 registered with Ambarnath Police Station under Sections 376, 313 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code is not quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR on compromise
  • Non-compoundable offences
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • Rape and abortion offences
  • Settlement in heinous crimes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (04) 62

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1399 of 2021

2021-04-05

S. S. Shinde, Manish Pitale

2021:BHC-AS:5175-DB

Mr. Dilip B. Shinde for Petitioner, Mr. R.M. Haridas i/by Mr. S.P. Mhatre for Respondent No. 2, Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for State

ABC

The State of Maharashtra and XYZ

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR for offences under Sections 376, 313, 406 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of FIR No. I-0616 of 2019 registered at Ambarnath Police Station.

Filing Reason

Petitioner and respondent No. 2 (victim) had amicably settled the dispute and sought quashing on that basis.

Issues

Whether an FIR for non-compoundable offences like rape and abortion can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner and respondent No. 2 submitted that they have amicably settled the dispute and the victim filed an affidavit stating her voluntary consent to quash the FIR. The learned APP opposed the petition, arguing that the allegations are serious and involve offences under Sections 376 and 313 IPC, which have a societal impact, and relied on Gian Singh, Parbatbhai Aahir, and Laxmi Narayan.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings should not be exercised for non-compoundable and heinous offences like rape and abortion, even if the parties have settled, as such offences are against society and public policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for compounding the offences. Offences under Sections 376 and 313 IPC are serious and heinous, and quashing on settlement is not permissible.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1399 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of FIR No. I-0616 of 2019. The petition was reserved on 31st March 2021 and pronounced on 5th April 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 376, 313, 406
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Rape FIR Despite Settlement. Non-Compoundable Offences Under Sections 376 and 313 IPC Cannot Be Quashed on Compromise as They Are Against Society.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 363, 365 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused bey...