Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Termination for Non-Compliance with Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977. Termination of Shikshan Sevak without prior approval of Education Officer under Section 5 of MEPS Act is illegal and void.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Udhav Kothawale, was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak (teacher) at Vasant Vidyalaya, run by respondent No.4 management, after approval by the Education Officer. His services were terminated by the management without prior approval of the Education Officer. He appealed to the School Tribunal, Solapur, which dismissed his appeal holding that as a Shikshan Sevak, he was not entitled to protection under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (MEPS Act). The petitioner challenged this order in the High Court. The High Court examined the provisions of Section 5 of the MEPS Act, which requires prior approval of the Education Officer for termination of service of any employee. The court held that the term 'employee' under the Act includes Shikshan Sevaks, and the requirement of prior approval is mandatory. The School Tribunal's view that Shikshan Sevaks are not covered was erroneous. The court set aside the termination order and the Tribunal's judgment, directing reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement, to be paid within three months.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of Shikshan Sevak - Prior Approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act - Termination of a Shikshan Sevak without prior approval of the Education Officer is illegal and void ab initio - The School Tribunal erred in dismissing the appeal on the ground that the petitioner was a Shikshan Sevak and not a permanent employee - Held that the requirement of prior approval under Section 5 applies to all employees, including Shikshan Sevaks, and termination without such approval is unsustainable (Paras 7-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether termination of a Shikshan Sevak without prior approval of the Education Officer under Section 5 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the termination order dated 30th June 2014 and the School Tribunal's judgment dated 29th April 2015. Directed reinstatement of the petitioner with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of termination till reinstatement, to be paid within three months.

Law Points

  • Termination of Shikshan Sevak without prior approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act is illegal
  • Section 5 of MEPS Act
  • 1977
  • Rule 12 of MEPS Rules
  • 1981
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (04) 11

Writ Petition No. 10565 of 2015

2021-04-01

N.J. Jamadar

Mr. B.A. Dhengle, Mr. S.A. Dhengle for petitioner; Mr. R.D. Sanap for respondents 1-3; Mr. S.S. Pawar for respondent 4; Mr. S.A. Nagargoje for respondent 5

Ashok S/o Udhav Kothawale

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Education, The Education Officer (Secondary), Marathwada Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, The Head Master

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the judgment of the School Tribunal dismissing the appeal against termination of service.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of termination order and reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's services were terminated by the management without prior approval of the Education Officer, and the School Tribunal dismissed his appeal.

Previous Decisions

School Tribunal, Solapur, dismissed Appeal No. 80 of 2014 on 29th April 2015.

Issues

Whether termination of a Shikshan Sevak without prior approval under Section 5 of MEPS Act is valid. Whether the School Tribunal erred in holding that Shikshan Sevaks are not entitled to protection under the MEPS Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that termination without prior approval of Education Officer is illegal under Section 5 of MEPS Act. Respondents contended that petitioner was a Shikshan Sevak and not a permanent employee, hence not entitled to protection.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement of prior approval under Section 5 of the MEPS Act applies to all employees, including Shikshan Sevaks, and termination without such approval is illegal and void ab initio.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement of prior approval under Section 5 of the MEPS Act applies to all employees, including Shikshan Sevaks. Termination without prior approval is illegal and void ab initio.

Procedural History

Petitioner was appointed as Shikshan Sevak on 1st July 2013. Services terminated on 30th June 2014. He filed Appeal No. 80 of 2014 before School Tribunal, Solapur, which was dismissed on 29th April 2015. He then filed the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977: Section 5
  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981: Rule 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Termination for Non-Compliance with Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977. Termination of Shikshan Sevak without prior approval of Education Officer under Section 5 of MEPS Act is illegal and void.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal in Part, Remands Contribution Demand for Recalculation. ESI Court's Reduction of Demand Under Section 45-A of ESI Act Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasoning.