Bombay High Court Grants Letters of Administration for Unattested Will of Sunni Muslim Testator — Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Not Applicable to Muslims; Hanafi Law Does Not Require Attestation

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case concerns an uncontested petition for Letters of Administration with Will annexed filed in 1990, which remained pending for 31 years. The testator, Rasubai Suleman Chinoy, a Sunni Hanafi Muslim, died in Mumbai on 10th October 1989. She executed a Will in Urdu on 20th December 1980, which did not contain any attestation by witnesses. The petitioners are four of her five children; the fifth child resides in Karachi, Pakistan, and could not be served. The Will bequeaths property inherited from her paternal aunt to a charity trust. The Registry objected on the ground that the Will lacked attestation as required by Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court framed two issues: whether Part VI of the Indian Succession Act applies to Muslims, and whether Sunni Hanafi law requires attestation of a Will. The court held that Section 58 read with Section 2(g) of the Act expressly excludes Muslims from Part VI, so Section 63 does not apply. Under Sunni Hanafi law, a Will is valid even without attestation. The court overruled the Registry's objection, permitted deletion of the deceased petitioner's name, and granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the remaining petitioners.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Applicability of Indian Succession Act to Muslims - Section 58, Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Part VI of the Act does not apply to Muslims - The court held that Section 58 read with Section 2(g) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 expressly excludes Muslims from the application of Part VI, which includes Section 63 regarding attestation of Wills (Paras 10-12).

B) Muslim Personal Law - Validity of Will - Attestation - Sunni Hanafi Law - Under Sunni Hanafi law, a Will is valid even if not attested by witnesses - The court relied on the principle that Muslim law does not require any particular form for a Will, and attestation is not a requirement for validity (Paras 13-15).

C) Testamentary Jurisdiction - Letters of Administration with Will Annexed - Grant despite lack of attestation - The court granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed, holding that the Will was valid under Muslim personal law and the objection of the Registry was overruled (Paras 16-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether Part VI of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to a Sunni Hanafi Muslim, and whether under Sunni Hanafi law attestation of a Will is required

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court overruled the Registry's objection, permitted deletion of the deceased petitioner's name, and granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the remaining petitioners.

Law Points

  • Section 63 of Indian Succession Act
  • 1925 does not apply to Muslims
  • Hanafi law does not require attestation of a Will
  • Will valid under Muslim personal law
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (03) 112

Testamentary Petition No. 135 of 1990

2021-03-10

G.S. Patel, J

Mr Jai Munim, i/b Bachubhai Munim & Co., for the Petitioners

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Uncontested petition for Letters of Administration with Will annexed

Remedy Sought

Grant of Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the petitioners

Filing Reason

To administer the estate of the deceased testator who left a Will without appointing executors

Issues

Whether Part VI of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 applies to a Sunni Hanafi Muslim Whether under Sunni Hanafi law attestation of a Will is required

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Will is valid under Muslim personal law and does not require attestation The Registry objected that the Will lacks attestation as required by Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925

Ratio Decidendi

Part VI of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 does not apply to Muslims by virtue of Section 58 read with Section 2(g). Under Sunni Hanafi Muslim law, a Will is valid even without attestation by witnesses. Therefore, the lack of attestation does not invalidate the Will.

Judgment Excerpts

The Will in question does not contain an attestation. It does not have, in other words, the signatures of any witnesses. Section 58 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 says that Part VI does not apply to intestate or testamentary succession to the property of any Hindu, Muhammadan, Buddhist, Sikh or Jain. Under Sunni Hanafi law, a Will is valid even if not attested by witnesses.

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 1990 and remained pending for 31 years. Two of the four petitioners passed away during this period. The matter was listed due to an objection by the Registry regarding lack of attestation. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 10th March 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: Section 58, Section 63, Section 2(g)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Letters of Administration for Unattested Will of Sunni Muslim Testator — Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Not Applicable to Muslims; Hanafi Law Does Not Require Attestation
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Directs Passport Authority to Reconsider Minor's Passport Application After Impoundment Due to Mother's Suppression. The court held that the authority must decide the fresh application on merits after hearing the petitioners, as th...