Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Admission of Tax Liability in Statement Constitutes Quantification Before Cutoff Date. The court held that the director's admission of service tax liability in a statement recorded on 09.04.2019 quantified the dues before 30.06.2019, making the petitioner eligible under Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jai Sai Ram Mech & Tech India P Ltd, a private limited company engaged in construction services and registered under the Finance Act, 1994, was subjected to an enquiry by Respondent No. 3 for alleged short payment of service tax for the period April 2012 to June 2017. During the enquiry, the director of the petitioner, Mr. Surajpal Singh, gave a statement on 09.04.2019 admitting service tax liability of approximately Rs. 40 to Rs. 45 lakhs. Subsequently, the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was introduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019. The petitioner filed a declaration under the scheme on 08.12.2019 under the category 'investigation, enquiry or audit' with sub-categorisation 'investigation by commissionerate', disclosing the quantum of service tax liability at Rs. 43,37,865 and a pre-deposit of Rs. 18,26,253. However, by order dated 02.01.2020, the Designated Committee rejected the declaration on the ground of ineligibility, stating that the amount of service tax liability was not quantified before 30.06.2019, the cutoff date under the scheme. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the rejection order and a direction to reconsider the declaration. The respondents filed a reply affidavit contending that the petitioner had agreed to produce financial documents but failed to do so, and therefore, under Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019, the amount was not quantified before the cutoff date. The High Court, after hearing both sides, observed that the admission of liability in the statement recorded on 09.04.2019 clearly quantified the tax dues before 30.06.2019. The court held that the Designated Committee erred in rejecting the declaration and quashed the impugned order. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the declaration afresh, treating the statement of the director as quantification of the tax dues, and to grant relief under the scheme in accordance with law. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Sabka Vishwas Scheme - Eligibility - Quantification of Tax Liability - Section 125(1)(e) Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 - Petitioner's director admitted service tax liability of Rs. 40-45 lakhs in a statement recorded on 09.04.2019 before the respondents. The Designated Committee rejected the declaration under the scheme on the ground that the amount was not quantified before 30.06.2019. The High Court held that the admission in the statement constitutes quantification of the tax liability, as the amount was clearly admitted and thus quantified before the cutoff date. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the declaration and grant relief under the scheme. (Paras 2-10)

B) Service Tax - Sabka Vishwas Scheme - Rejection of Declaration - Remand - Section 125(1)(e) Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 - The court found that the Designated Committee erred in rejecting the declaration without considering the admission of liability in the statement. The impugned order dated 02.01.2020 was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Designated Committee for fresh consideration, directing that the statement of the director be treated as quantification of the tax dues. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the admission of service tax liability by the petitioner's director in a statement recorded on 09.04.2019 amounts to quantification of the amount of duty involved on or before 30.06.2019, making the petitioner eligible under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned order dated 02.01.2020, and directed the respondents to reconsider the petitioner's declaration afresh, treating the statement of the director dated 09.04.2019 as quantification of the tax dues, and to grant relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Quantification of tax liability
  • Admission in statement as quantification
  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme
  • 2019
  • Section 125(1)(e) Finance (No. 2) Act
  • Cutoff date 30.06.2019
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (02) 102

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 848 OF 2020

2021-02-12

Ujjal Bhuyan, Milind N. Jadhav

Ms. Deepali Kamble for the Petitioner, Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Sangeet Yadav for the Respondents

Jai Sai Ram Mech & Tech India P Ltd

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging rejection of declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 02.01.2020 rejecting its declaration and a direction to respondents to reconsider the declaration and grant relief under the scheme.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme was rejected on the ground that the amount of service tax liability was not quantified before 30.06.2019.

Previous Decisions

The Designated Committee rejected the petitioner's declaration by order dated 02.01.2020.

Issues

Whether the admission of service tax liability in a statement recorded on 09.04.2019 constitutes quantification of the amount of duty involved on or before 30.06.2019 under Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019. Whether the Designated Committee was justified in rejecting the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the director's statement on 09.04.2019 admitting liability of Rs. 40-45 lakhs quantified the tax dues before the cutoff date of 30.06.2019. Respondents argued that the petitioner failed to produce financial documents and therefore the amount was not quantified before 30.06.2019, making the petitioner ineligible under Section 125(1)(e).

Ratio Decidendi

An admission of tax liability in a statement recorded during an enquiry constitutes quantification of the amount of duty involved for the purposes of Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019, as it clearly specifies the amount of liability. Therefore, if such admission is made before the cutoff date of 30.06.2019, the declarant is eligible under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Judgment Excerpts

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 02.01.2020 passed by the respondents rejecting the declaration of the petitioner dated 8.12.2019 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019... Petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of providing construction services to its customers. Respondent No. 3 initiated an enquiry against the petitioner for alleged short payment of service tax for the period from April 2012 to June 2017. statement of the director of the petitioner Mr. Surajpal Singh was recorded before the respondents on 09.04.2019 wherein he admitted service tax liability of the petitioner to the extent of Rs. 40 to Rs. 45 lakhs (approximately) for the aforesaid period. by order dated 02.01.2020, the said declaration of the petitioner was rejected on the ground of ineligibility with the remark that the amount of service tax liability of the petitioner was not quantified before 30.06.2019 which is the cutoff date under the scheme. Stand taken in the reply affidavit is that as per statement on record dated 09.04.2019, petitioner had agreed to produce financial documents... but failed to submit the same... Therefore, as per section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019, since the amount of duty involved had not been quantified on or before 30.06.2019, petitioner was not eligible to avail benefit under the scheme.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme on 08.12.2019. The Designated Committee rejected the declaration by order dated 02.01.2020. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date. The matter was heard on 27.01.2021 and finally on 12.02.2021, when the judgment was delivered.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019: Section 125(1)(e)
  • Finance Act, 1994:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Admission of Tax Liability in Statement Constitutes Quantification Before Cutoff Date. The court held that the director's admission of service tax liability in a statement record...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Union of India's Revision in Arbitration Execution Case Due to Merger of Interim Award with Final Award. Interest Calculation Must Be Based on Final Award Under Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...