Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Permanent Disability. Negligence of Qualis Jeep driver established; no contributory negligence by motorcycle rider; award of Rs. 10,00,000 upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 06.02.2009. The claimant, Hemant Dabolkar, aged 35, was a Branch Manager at M/s Space Office System Pvt. Ltd., earning Rs. 27,050 per month. He was travelling as a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by Shivaji Fatan from Ponda to Panaji. Near William Construction, Sao Pedro, the respondent Sasanand Vaigankar drove a Qualis Jeep bearing registration no. GA-01-R-5527 from the opposite direction and, without giving any hand or light signal, took a sudden right turn and dashed against the motorcycle. The claimant sustained severe injuries to his right leg, resulting in 40% permanent disability. He filed a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Panaji, Goa, seeking compensation. The Tribunal, by judgment and award dated 01.03.2012, held the driver of the Qualis Jeep negligent and awarded Rs. 10,00,000 as compensation with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. The Insurance Company, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., appealed against the award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, contending that the accident was caused due to contributory negligence of the motorcycle rider and that the compensation was excessive. The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed the appeal. The court found that the Tribunal had correctly assessed the evidence, including the FIR and the testimony of the claimant, which showed that the Qualis driver took a sudden turn without signal. The court held that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the motorcycle rider. Regarding compensation, the court noted that the claimant suffered 40% permanent disability to his right lower limb, which affected his earning capacity. The Tribunal had considered his monthly income, applied the multiplier method, and awarded Rs. 6,00,000 for loss of future income, Rs. 1,50,000 for pain and suffering, Rs. 1,00,000 for loss of amenities, and Rs. 1,50,000 for medical expenses and future treatment. The High Court found the compensation just and reasonable, and dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Negligence - Rash and Negligent Driving - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Sections 166, 168 - The claimant, a pillion rider, sustained severe injuries when the respondent driver of a Qualis Jeep took a sudden turn without signal and dashed against the motorcycle. The Tribunal held the driver negligent. The High Court affirmed, finding no contributory negligence by the motorcycle rider. (Paras 2-5)

B) Compensation - Permanent Disability - Assessment of Disability - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168 - The claimant suffered 40% permanent disability to the right lower limb. The Tribunal awarded Rs. 10,00,000 including loss of future income, pain and suffering, and medical expenses. The High Court upheld the award, noting the disability affected his earning capacity as Branch Manager. (Paras 6-10)

C) Appeal by Insurance Company - Liability - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173 - The Insurance Company appealed against the award, arguing contributory negligence and excessive compensation. The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Tribunal correctly assessed negligence and compensation based on evidence. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Claims Tribunal erred in awarding compensation of Rs. 10,00,000 to the claimant for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, and whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment and award dated 01.03.2012 of the Claims Tribunal, Panaji, Goa. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 168
  • Section 173
  • negligence
  • contributory negligence
  • permanent disability
  • compensation
  • multiplier method
  • future prospects
  • pain and suffering
  • loss of amenities
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (01) 73

First Appeal No. 119 of 2012

2021-01-27

M.S. Jawalkar, J.

2021:BHC-GOA:88

Mr. Emerico Afonso for Appellant, Mr. Vaman Kurtikar for Respondent No. 1

United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Mr. Hemant Dabolkar and Shri Sasanand Vaigankar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by Insurance Company against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought setting aside of the Tribunal's award of Rs. 10,00,000

Filing Reason

Insurance Company contended that the accident was due to contributory negligence of the motorcycle rider and that compensation was excessive

Previous Decisions

Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Panaji, Goa awarded Rs. 10,00,000 with interest on 01.03.2012 in Claim Petition No. 67/2009

Issues

Whether the accident was caused due to negligence of the Qualis Jeep driver or contributory negligence of the motorcycle rider? Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The accident occurred due to contributory negligence of the motorcycle rider; the compensation is excessive and not based on proper assessment of disability. Respondent No. 1 (Claimant): The Qualis driver was solely negligent; the Tribunal correctly assessed disability and compensation.

Ratio Decidendi

The driver of the Qualis Jeep was negligent in taking a sudden turn without signal, causing the accident. There was no contributory negligence by the motorcycle rider. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal was just and reasonable, considering the 40% permanent disability and its impact on the claimant's earning capacity.

Judgment Excerpts

The case of the claimant before the Claims Tribunal was as under:- Claimant was 35 years old, in service as the Branch Manager of the Goa Branch of M/s Space Office System Pvt. Ltd. and was earning Rs.27,050/- per month. On 06.02.2009, he was travelling as a pillion rider on the motorcycle bearing registration no. GA-09-C-0761, driven by one Shivaji Fatan from Ponda to Panaji. The respondent no. 1 came driving the Qualis Jeep bearing registration no. GA-01-R-5527 from the opposite direction and without giving hand or light signal took the vehicle to his extreme right hand side and gave a dash to the motorcycle.

Procedural History

The claimant filed Claim Petition No. 67/2009 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Panaji, Goa. The Tribunal passed judgment and award on 01.03.2012. The Insurance Company appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Goa under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appeal was reserved on 08.01.2021 and pronounced on 27.01.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 168, Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award rejecting claim for specific performance of oral agreement to transfer sha...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Permanent Disability. Negligence of Qualis Jeep driver established; no contributory negligence by motorcycle rider; award of Rs. 10,00,...