Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder of Wife Over Burnt Meat. Conviction under Section 302 IPC based on dying declaration and circumstantial evidence held sustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Suresh Madhukar Shendre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the murder of his wife, Chhaya, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 50,000. The prosecution case was that on 3 September 2015, the appellant, in a drunken state, quarreled with his wife over burnt meat and set her on fire, resulting in her death. The informant, Sunil Shendre, a neighbour, heard the quarrel and saw the appellant assaulting the deceased. The deceased succumbed to her injuries and before her death, she gave a dying declaration to a Special Executive Magistrate, implicating the appellant. The appellant challenged the conviction on the ground that the dying declaration was not reliable and that there was no other evidence to corroborate it. The High Court, after hearing both sides, examined the dying declaration and found it to be voluntary, truthful, and consistent with the medical evidence. The court held that a dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it inspires confidence. The court also noted that the appellant had a history of domestic violence and that the incident occurred over a trivial issue. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Dying Declaration - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Credibility - The dying declaration of the deceased was recorded by a Special Executive Magistrate and was found to be voluntary, truthful, and consistent with the medical evidence. The court held that a dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it inspires confidence and is free from tutoring or prompting. (Paras 10-15)

B) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Life Imprisonment - The appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by setting her on fire after a quarrel over burnt meat. The court upheld the life sentence, noting that the dying declaration clearly implicated the appellant and the medical evidence supported the cause of death as burn injuries. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable on the basis of the dying declaration and other circumstantial evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 302 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Dying declaration
  • Section 32 Indian Evidence Act
  • 1872
  • credibility of dying declaration
  • conviction on dying declaration without corroboration
  • Section 302 Indian Penal Code
  • 1860
  • murder
  • life imprisonment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (12) 138

Criminal Appeal No.347 of 2019

2022-12-06

Rohit B. Deo, Urmila Joshi-Phalke

Shri S.G. Joshi (for appellant), Shri M.J. Khan (Additional Public Prosecutor for State)

Suresh Madhukar Shendre

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife by setting her on fire after a quarrel over burnt meat.

Previous Decisions

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, in Sessions Case No.111/2015 on 20.7.2017.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration is reliable and can be the sole basis for conviction. Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not reliable and there was no corroborative evidence. State argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and truthful, and the medical evidence supported the prosecution case.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if it is voluntary, truthful, and inspires confidence. The court found the dying declaration in this case to be reliable and consistent with medical evidence, thus upholding the conviction.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant challenges judgment and order dated 20.7.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No.111/2015 whereby he is convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of the fine amount to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. The case of the prosecution in a nutshell is as under: The crime is registered on the basis of report lodged by one Sunil Shendre on 4.9.2015 on allegations that deceased Chhaya was residing along with her husband i.e. the appellant (for short, 'the accused') and daughter Kajal in his neighbourhood.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, on 20.7.2017 in Sessions Case No.111/2015 for murder under Section 302 IPC. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which heard the appeal and reserved judgment on 21.11.2022, pronouncing it on 06.12.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 428
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder of Wife Over Burnt Meat. Conviction under Section 302 IPC based on dying declaration and circumstantial evidence held sustainable.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claim Cases Due to Erroneous Application of Contributory Negligence. Claim petitions under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 dismissed by Tribunal and High Court on ground of contributory negligenc...