Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Plea in Hindu Marriage Act Case - Capacity to Earn Distinguished from Actual Earning. Family Court's rejection of interim maintenance under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 set aside as it erroneously relied on wife's qualifications and unverified social media job claim.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-wife filed a petition under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking interim maintenance pendente lite in connection with her petition for annulment of marriage. The Family Court, Jalgaon rejected her application on two grounds: that she possessed higher qualifications and that her social media status indicated she had secured a job in London. The wife challenged this order before the Bombay High Court. The High Court observed that the Family Court had erroneously equated capacity to earn with actual earning. It noted that the wife had established she was not actually earning any income, and the social media declaration was not conclusive proof of employment. The Court held that interim maintenance cannot be denied solely on the basis of qualifications or unverified social media claims. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Family Court for fresh consideration of the maintenance application, directing the Family Court to decide it afresh within three months. The Court also directed the husband to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance from the date of the application until the fresh decision.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Maintenance Pendente Lite - Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Capacity to Earn vs Actual Earning - The Family Court rejected wife's application for interim maintenance on grounds of her higher qualifications and a social media status indicating a job in London. The High Court held that capacity or ability to earn is different from actual earning, and mere possession of qualifications or unverified social media declarations cannot be a basis to deny maintenance. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Family Court was justified in rejecting the wife's application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the grounds that she possesses higher qualifications and had made a social media declaration about securing a job in London.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 04.12.2019 passed by the Family Court, Jalgaon is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Family Court for fresh consideration of the application for interim maintenance. The Family Court is directed to decide the application afresh within three months from the date of the order. The respondent-husband is directed to pay Rs. 5,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner-wife from the date of the application until the fresh decision.

Law Points

  • Capacity to earn is different from actual earning
  • Interim maintenance cannot be denied solely on basis of higher qualifications
  • Social media status is not conclusive proof of employment
  • Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 10

WRIT PETITION NO.2668 OF 2021

2022-11-23

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

Mr. S. V. Deshmukh for Petitioner, Mr. A. A. Nimbalkar for Respondent

Aboil alias Yugandhara w/o Tejpal Patil

Tejpal S/o Premchand Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Family Court rejecting application for interim maintenance under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-wife sought setting aside of Family Court order and grant of interim maintenance pendente lite.

Filing Reason

Family Court rejected wife's application for interim maintenance on grounds of her higher qualifications and social media status indicating a job in London.

Previous Decisions

Family Court, Jalgaon rejected application at Exhibit-7 in Petition A-334/2019 vide order dated 04.12.2019.

Issues

Whether the Family Court erred in rejecting interim maintenance solely on the basis of the wife's higher qualifications and a social media declaration about a job in London. Whether capacity to earn can be equated with actual earning for the purpose of Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner's counsel argued that mere possession of qualifications cannot be a reason to deny maintenance as capacity to earn is different from actual earning; petitioner is actually jobless. Petitioner's counsel relied on Shailja and Another Vs. Khobbanna and Smt. Megha Khandelwa vs. Rajat Khandelwal to support the distinction between capacity to earn and actual earning.

Ratio Decidendi

Capacity or ability to earn is different from actual earning. Interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cannot be denied solely on the basis of higher qualifications or unverified social media declarations about employment. The court must consider the actual income of the applicant.

Judgment Excerpts

capacity or ability to earn is different from actual earning. mere possession of qualifications by petitioner could not have been a reason for denial of interim maintenance in the light of the position that petitioner is actually jobless.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Petition A-334/2019 before Family Court, Jalgaon for annulment of marriage. She filed application at Exhibit-7 under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for interim maintenance. Family Court rejected the application on 04.12.2019. Petitioner challenged the order by filing Writ Petition No.2668 of 2021 before Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Maintenance Plea in Hindu Marriage Act Case - Capacity to Earn Distinguished from Actual Earning. Family Court's rejection of interim maintenance under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 set aside as it erroneously...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. Held that claimants must prove income and negligence; Tribunal's award modified.