Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Assessment Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders set aside as show cause notices and assessment orders were uploaded on GST portal without actual communication to the petitioners, depriving them of opportunity to be heard.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by Oasis Realty, Roma Builders Pvt Ltd, and Macrotech Developers Limited challenging assessment orders passed under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioners contended that show cause notices and assessment orders were uploaded on the GST portal but were never communicated to them, depriving them of an opportunity to respond. The respondents argued that the petitioners had access to the portal and could have viewed the notices. The court examined the facts and found that the petitioners were not aware of the proceedings and were not given a fair hearing. The court held that uploading documents on the portal without actual communication violates principles of natural justice. Consequently, the court set aside the assessment orders and remanded the matters back to the assessing officers to pass fresh orders after providing the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. The court also directed that the period from the date of the original orders to the date of this judgment shall be excluded for computing limitation.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - Communication - Uploading of show cause notice and assessment order on GST portal without actual communication to the assessee violates principles of natural justice - The court held that mere uploading on the portal does not constitute proper service, and the assessee must be given an opportunity of hearing before an adverse order is passed (Paras 6-8).

B) Goods and Services Tax - Assessment - Limitation - Remand - Where assessment orders are set aside for violation of natural justice, the matter is remanded back to the assessing officer to pass fresh orders after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing, and the period from the date of the original order to the date of this judgment shall be excluded for computing limitation (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether assessment orders passed under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 without proper communication of show cause notices and orders to the assessee, merely by uploading on the GST portal, are sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the assessment orders, and remanded the matters back to the assessing officers to pass fresh orders after giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing. The period from the date of the original orders to the date of this judgment shall be excluded for computing limitation.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • show cause notice
  • assessment order
  • GST
  • communication
  • portal upload
  • limitation period
  • remand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 118

Writ Petition (ST) No. 23507 of 2022, Writ Petition (ST) No. 12287 of 2022, Writ Petition (ST) No. 12457 of 2022

2022-09-29

Mr. Prakash Shah a/w Mr. Jas Sanghavi, Mr. Mihir Mehta and Mr. Yash Prakash i/by PDS Legal for Petitioner in WPL No.23507 of 2022; Mr. Rahul C. Thakar i/by Mr. C. B. Thakar for Petitioner in WPL No.12287 of 2022; Mr. Vishal Agrawal a/w Mr. Akshit Malhotra and Ms. Hima Doshi i/by Mr. Vishal Agrawal for Petitioner in WPL No.12457 of 2022; Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for Respondent-State; Mr. J. B. Mishra for Respondent-Union of India

Oasis Realty, Roma Builders Pvt Ltd, Macrotech Developers Limited

Union of India, Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) – V, Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of assessment orders and direction to the respondents to provide an opportunity of hearing.

Filing Reason

Assessment orders were passed without proper communication of show cause notices and orders, as they were merely uploaded on the GST portal without actual service on the petitioners.

Issues

Whether the assessment orders passed under the MGST Act without proper communication of show cause notices and orders to the assessee are sustainable. Whether uploading of documents on the GST portal constitutes sufficient service.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that show cause notices and assessment orders were uploaded on the GST portal but never communicated to them, violating natural justice. Respondents contended that the petitioners had access to the GST portal and could have viewed the notices and orders.

Ratio Decidendi

Uploading of show cause notice and assessment order on the GST portal without actual communication to the assessee does not constitute proper service and violates principles of natural justice. The assessee must be given an opportunity of hearing before an adverse order is passed.

Judgment Excerpts

The show cause notices and assessment orders were uploaded on the GST portal but were never communicated to the petitioners. The petitioners were not aware of the proceedings and were not given an opportunity of hearing. The assessment orders are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the assessing officers to pass fresh orders after giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Deputy Manager in Warehousing Corporation Case — Recovery Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.2,46,130/- from Terminal Benefits for All...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Injunction Suit — Limitation Issue Must Be Decided as Preliminary Issue Before Remand. The lower appellate court's order of remand was set aside as it failed to adjudicate the p...