Case Note & Summary
The applicants, including the Principal and employees of Dr. Arun Motghare College, faced criminal proceedings initiated by the respondent No.2, an employee of the college, who alleged humiliation and caste-based abuses. The respondent No.2 had been issued a chargesheet for misconduct on 3-6-2019. Subsequently, he filed a police complaint, but the police, after enquiry, found no substance and submitted a report to the Superintendent of Police on 13-10-2018 stating no case was made out. Despite this, the respondent No.2 filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the Magistrate ordered investigation, leading to registration of an FIR for offences under the SC/ST Act and other provisions. The applicants sought quashing of the FIR and proceedings under Section 482 CrPC. The High Court examined the material and found that the police enquiry had already concluded the complaint was false, and there was no credible evidence of caste-based humiliation. The court held that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings, emphasizing that the complaint was motivated by the departmental action against the respondent No.2.
Headnote
A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The High Court can quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law when the complaint lacks prima facie evidence and appears to be motivated by ulterior motives. (Paras 1-10)
B) SC/ST Act - Prima Facie Case - Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - The court found no credible material to show that the applicants had humiliated or abused the informant on caste basis, as the police enquiry had already found the complaint to be false. (Paras 3-8)
C) Criminal Procedure Code - Application under Section 156(3) CrPC - Magistrate's Order - The Magistrate must apply judicial mind and not mechanically order investigation; however, in this case, the order was set aside due to lack of substance in the complaint. (Paras 4-9)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the criminal proceedings initiated against the applicants under the SC/ST Act and other offences should be quashed for lack of prima facie evidence and being an abuse of the process of law.
Final Decision
The High Court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings against the applicants.
Law Points
- Quashing of FIR
- Abuse of process of law
- Malicious prosecution
- No prima facie case
- Section 482 CrPC
- Section 156(3) CrPC
- SC/ST Act
Case Details
2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 136
Criminal Application (APL) No.907 of 2019
Sunil B. Shukre, G.A. Sanap
Shri Sunil Manohar, Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri A.A. Dhawas for Applicants; Shri S.S. Doifode, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1-State; Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Arun Laxman Motghare, Naresh Ramji Motghare, Mahesh Ashok Motghare, Rakesh Gulab Asole
State of Maharashtra, Bhaurao Gangaram Panchwate
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings.
Remedy Sought
The applicants sought quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings initiated against them.
Filing Reason
The applicants alleged that the criminal complaint was false and motivated by the departmental action taken against the respondent No.2.
Previous Decisions
The police had conducted an enquiry and found no substance in the complaint, submitting a report to the Superintendent of Police on 13-10-2018 stating no case was made out. Despite this, the Magistrate ordered investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, leading to registration of FIR.
Issues
Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings against the applicants should be quashed for lack of prima facie evidence.
Whether the proceedings were an abuse of the process of law.
Submissions/Arguments
The applicants argued that the complaint was false and motivated by the departmental action against the respondent No.2.
The respondent No.2 contended that the applicants had humiliated and abused him on caste basis.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law. When the police enquiry has already found the complaint to be false and there is no credible evidence of caste-based humiliation, continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process. The complaint appeared to be motivated by the departmental action against the informant.
Judgment Excerpts
The police officer, after making enquiries, found no substance in the complaint and, therefore, submitted a report to the Superintendent of Police, Bhandara, on 13-10-2018 stating therein that no case was made out by the respondent No.2 for registration of the offences against the applicants.
One thing is certain that no offence was registered against the applicants.
Procedural History
The respondent No.2 filed a police complaint alleging caste-based humiliation. The police conducted an enquiry and found no substance, submitting a report on 13-10-2018. The respondent No.2 then filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the Magistrate ordered investigation, leading to registration of FIR. The applicants filed the present application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing.
Acts & Sections
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 156(3), 482
- Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989: 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC):
