Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Shipping Bills in Customs Case Due to Clerical Error. Petitioner permitted to convert shipping bills from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Pinnacle Life Science Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture and supply of medicaments and holds an Importer-Exporter Code. It sought relief in the form of a direction to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 (Commissioner of Customs and Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs) to permit amendment of six shipping bills for inserting Advance Authorization details, which were not mentioned on the GST Invoices and Commercial Invoices due to a clerical error. Consequently, the details of Advance Authorization were not reflected in the shipping bills. The petitioner also sought conversion of the shipping bills from the Drawback Scheme to the Advance Authorization Scheme. Without such amendment and conversion, the petitioner could not claim adjustment of expenses made under the shipping bills towards export obligation under the Advance Authorization and could not receive Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) under the said scheme in respect of Advance Authorizations dated 22nd February 2019, 20th June 2019, and 25th September 2019. The petitioner's request to Respondent No.3 for leave to amend the shipping bills was rejected. The court considered the issue of whether amendment of shipping bills is permissible under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, after export of goods. The court noted that the error was clerical and that no revenue loss would be caused. The court held that the amendment is permissible and directed the respondents to allow the amendment and conversion within four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Amendment of Shipping Bills - Section 149 Customs Act, 1962 - Clerical Error - Petitioner sought to amend six shipping bills to insert Advance Authorization details and convert from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme due to clerical omission in invoices - Court held that amendment is permissible under Section 149 as it is a clerical error and no revenue loss is caused - Directed respondents to allow amendment and conversion within four weeks (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner can be permitted to amend shipping bills to insert Advance Authorization details and convert them from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme after the goods have been exported, due to a clerical error.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to permit the petitioner to amend the six shipping bills by inserting the Advance Authorization details and to convert the shipping bills from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme within four weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Amendment of shipping bills
  • Advance Authorization Scheme
  • Drawback Scheme
  • clerical error
  • export obligation discharge
  • Foreign Trade Policy
  • Customs Act
  • 1962
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 88

WRIT PETITION NO. 1198 OF 2022

2022-07-11

K.R. SHRIRAM, MILIND N. JADHAV

2022:BHC-AS:15686-DB

Mr. Namboodiri Prasannan a/w Ms. Tejal Darekar for Petitioner, Mr. J.B. Mishra a/w Mr. Ram Ochari and Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh for Respondents

Pinnacle Life Science Pvt. Ltd.

Union of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Commissioner of Customs, Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to permit amendment of shipping bills and conversion from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme.

Remedy Sought

Direction to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to permit amendment of six shipping bills for inserting Advance Authorization details and conversion from Drawback Scheme to Advance Authorization Scheme.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's request to amend shipping bills was rejected by Respondent No.3 due to clerical error in not mentioning Advance Authorization details on invoices.

Issues

Whether amendment of shipping bills is permissible under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 after export of goods due to clerical error.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that without amendment and conversion, it cannot claim adjustment of expenses towards export obligation under Advance Authorization and cannot receive EODC. Respondents opposed the amendment, but the court found no revenue loss and allowed it.

Ratio Decidendi

Amendment of shipping bills under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 is permissible for clerical errors even after export, provided no revenue loss is caused.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is seeking relief in the form of direction to Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to permit petitioner to amend six shipping bills for inserting Advance Authorization details thereon which according to petitioner was not mentioned on the GST Invoices and Commercial Invoices due to clerical error of petitioner. Without amendment and conversion of the shipping bills petitioner cannot claim adjustment of the expenses made under the shipping bills towards export obligation under the Advance Authorization and cannot receive Export Obligation Discharge Certificate (EODC) under the said scheme.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 1198 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court seeking direction to permit amendment of shipping bills. The petition was taken up for hearing at the admission stage by consent and disposed of on 11th July 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecutio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Gram Panchayat Election for Non-Compliance with Reservation Rotation Policy. The court upheld the trial court's decision that the election of petitioners was invalid due to failur...