Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Student. Notional Income Increased to Rs.5,000 per Month and Multiplier Applied as per Age of Deceased.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellants, parents of the deceased Sachin, filed an appeal for enhancement of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur, for the death of their son in a vehicular accident. The deceased was a 27-year-old Science stream student who had scored distinction in every examination and intended to pursue M.Sc. The Tribunal had considered the deceased's notional income at Rs.3,000 per month, applied a multiplier based on the average age of the parents, and awarded Rs.2,77,000 with interest at 9% per annum. The appellants contended that the notional income should be at least Rs.5,000 per month and the multiplier should be based on the age of the deceased. The High Court, after hearing the counsel for the appellants and the insurance company, held that the notional income of the deceased should be enhanced to Rs.5,000 per month considering his academic merit and future prospects. The Court also held that the multiplier should be applied based on the age of the deceased (27 years) as per settled law, which is 18. The Court allowed the appeal, enhanced the compensation, and directed the insurance company to pay the enhanced amount with interest.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Death of Student - Notional Income - The Tribunal notionally assessed the income of a 27-year-old Science student at Rs.3,000 per month, which was enhanced to Rs.5,000 per month by the High Court considering the deceased's academic merit and future prospects - Held that notional income should be just and reasonable (Paras 1-3).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Multiplier - Applicability - The Tribunal applied multiplier based on the average age of the parents, which was erroneous - The correct multiplier should be based on the age of the deceased as per the settled law - Held that multiplier of 18 (for age 27) should be applied (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of a 27-year-old student is just and proper, and whether the notional income and multiplier applied by the Tribunal are correct.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The compensation is enhanced. The insurance company is directed to pay the enhanced amount with interest.

Law Points

  • Notional income assessment for deceased student
  • multiplier determination for parents' claim
  • enhancement of compensation under Motor Vehicles Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 9

First Appeal No.524 of 2014

2022-07-08

S.G. Dige

Mr. Abhijit C. Darandale for appellants, Mr. Abhijit Choudhary for respondent no.3

Raosaheb s/o. Kisan Patare and Smt. Tarabai Raosaheb Patare

Satish s/o. Kundlik Pawar, Anil Kakasaheb Sonawane, and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal for enhancement of compensation in a motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Filing Reason

The appellants, parents of the deceased, were dissatisfied with the compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur, awarded Rs.2,77,000 with interest at 9% per annum

Issues

Whether the notional income of the deceased student should be enhanced from Rs.3,000 to Rs.5,000 per month? Whether the multiplier should be applied based on the age of the deceased or the age of the parents?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the deceased was a meritorious student with a bright future, and his notional income should be at least Rs.5,000 per month. Appellants argued that the multiplier should be based on the age of the deceased, not the parents.

Ratio Decidendi

In motor accident claims for deceased students, the notional income should be assessed reasonably considering the deceased's academic merit and future prospects. The multiplier should be applied based on the age of the deceased as per settled law.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an appeal for enhancement of compensation granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur on account of death in vehicular accident. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the deceased was meritorious student. He had scored distinction in every examination. The learned counsel further submits that the notional income of the deceased should have been considered at least, at Rs.5,000/- per month.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shrirampur, awarded compensation of Rs.2,77,000 with interest at 9% per annum. The appellants filed First Appeal No.524 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court for enhancement.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Student. Notional Income Increased to Rs.5,000 per Month and Multiplier Applied as per Age of Deceased.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Second Time Bound Promotional Pay Scale to Retired Employees. Held that the period of 12 years for the second time bound promotion must be computed from the date of grant of the first time bound promotion, n...