Bombay High Court Allows Minor's Petition for Termination of Pregnancy in Case of Sexual Assault and Economic Hardship. Right to Reproductive Autonomy Upheld Under Article 21 and Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 56
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a minor girl, was a child in conflict with law lodged at the Government Girls Observation Home, Amravati, for an offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. She was also a victim of sexual assault, leading to the registration of Crime No.101/2021 under Section 376 read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. During investigation, she was found to be pregnant. The petitioner sought permission to terminate her pregnancy, which was of 12 weeks at the time of filing, citing economic hardship and the unwanted nature of the pregnancy due to sexual assault. The Court called for a Medical Board report, which opined that the pregnancy was of 16 weeks and that the petitioner had consented to termination. The Court considered the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, particularly Sections 3 and 5, and held that continuing the pregnancy would violate the petitioner's personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court noted that the petitioner was a minor and a victim of sexual assault, and the pregnancy was unwanted. The Medical Board's report confirmed her consent. The Court directed the respondent No.2, District General Hospital, Amravati, to terminate the pregnancy in accordance with law, ensuring that the procedure is conducted safely and with due care. The petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Medical Termination of Pregnancy - Minor's Consent - Unwanted Pregnancy - The petitioner, a minor child in conflict with law and victim of sexual assault, sought termination of pregnancy of 16 weeks. The Medical Board reported her consent. The Court held that continuing the pregnancy would violate her personal liberty and cause mental trauma. Permission granted for termination under Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, read with Section 5, considering the minor's consent and the circumstances of sexual assault. (Paras 1-6)

B) Personal Liberty - Reproductive Autonomy - Article 21 of the Constitution of India - The Court recognized that an unwanted pregnancy resulting from sexual assault infringes upon a woman's right to reproductive autonomy and personal liberty. The Court directed the respondent hospital to terminate the pregnancy, emphasizing that the minor's consent and the Medical Board's opinion were sufficient. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a minor child in conflict with law, who is also a victim of sexual assault, can be permitted to terminate her pregnancy of 16 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, considering her economic hardship and the unwanted nature of the pregnancy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondent No.2, District General Hospital, Amravati, is directed to terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner in accordance with law. Rule is made absolute.

Law Points

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act
  • 1971
  • Sections 3 and 5
  • Right to reproductive autonomy
  • Personal liberty under Article 21
  • Minor's consent
  • Unwanted pregnancy due to sexual assault
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (06) 95

Writ Petition No.2823 of 2022

2022-06-27

A.S. Chandurkar, Urmila Joshi-Phalke

Ms. S.H. Bhatia for Petitioner, Ms. N.P. Mehta for Respondent/State

State of Maharashtra, District General Hospital, Amravati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondent No.2 to terminate the petitioner's pregnancy.

Filing Reason

Petitioner, a minor and victim of sexual assault, became pregnant and sought termination due to economic hardship and unwanted pregnancy.

Previous Decisions

The Court had called for a Medical Board report by order dated 07.06.2022, which was received on 14.06.2022.

Issues

Whether the petitioner, a minor child in conflict with law and victim of sexual assault, is entitled to terminate her pregnancy of 16 weeks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. Whether continuing the pregnancy would violate the petitioner's right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that she is from an economically weak section and unable to bring up the child; she suffered due to sexual abuse and the pregnancy is unwanted, violating her personal liberty. Respondent/State did not oppose the petition; Medical Board report confirmed pregnancy of 16 weeks and petitioner's consent.

Ratio Decidendi

A minor victim of sexual assault has the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, as continuing the pregnancy would violate her personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The consent of the minor, as confirmed by the Medical Board, is sufficient for termination.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner contends that she is child in conflict with law and lodged with the Government Girls Observation Home, Amravati. The Medical Board opined that the petitioner had pregnancy of 16 weeks and has consented for termination. The pregnancy of the petitioner is unwanted and the same violate her personal liberty.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2823 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. On 07.06.2022, the Court called for a Medical Board report. The report was submitted on 14.06.2022. The petition was heard finally on 27.06.2022 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971: 3, 5
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 363, 376
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 4
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Lecturer's Appeal Against Compulsory Retirement Under Orissa Service Code; Single Adverse Entry Held Insufficient When Overall Record Was Good. Compulsory Retirement Based Solely on One Year's Adverse Remarks Was Arbitrary and No...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Witness Committed Perjury by Resiling from Previous Statement. The Court found that PW 22 Deepak Trivedi, an eye witness, resiled from his earlier statement re...