Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Compassionate Appointment Due to Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners Failed to Apply Within Prescribed Time Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 2016.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Jagdish Pundlik Wagh and Yashwant Jagdish Wagh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and various officers of the Soil and Water Conservation Department, to consider their application for compassionate appointment. The petitioners claimed that the deceased employee, Pundlik Wagh, died on 10th August 2008, and the petitioners applied for compassionate appointment on 30th June 2020, after a delay of about 12 years. The court noted that the application was made beyond the prescribed time limit under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 2016. The court held that the petitioners failed to provide any explanation for the delay and that the writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel the respondents to consider a belated application. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioners are not entitled to any relief.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Limitation - Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 2016 - The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus for compassionate appointment after a delay of about 12 years from the date of death of the deceased employee. The court held that the application for compassionate appointment must be made within the time prescribed under the Rules, and the petitioners failed to do so. The writ petition was dismissed as the petitioners did not apply within the prescribed time limit. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider their application for compassionate appointment, given that the application was made after a delay of about 12 years from the date of death of the deceased employee.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Limitation
  • Mandamus
  • Delay and laches
  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (06) 9

Writ Petition No. 3417 of 2022

2022-06-27

Ravindra V. Ghuge, Anil L. Pansare

Mr. S. P. Shah for the petitioners, Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for the respondents/State

Jagdish Pundlik Wagh, Yashwant Jagdish Wagh

State of Maharashtra, Commissioner, Soil and Water Conservation, Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Assistant Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation, Collector, Dhule

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus for compassionate appointment.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' application for compassionate appointment.

Filing Reason

Petitioners' application for compassionate appointment was not considered due to delay.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of mandamus for compassionate appointment after a delay of about 12 years.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they applied for compassionate appointment on 30th June 2020, but the respondents did not consider it. Respondents/State argued that the application was made after a delay of about 12 years from the date of death of the deceased employee.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ of mandamus cannot be issued to compel consideration of a belated application for compassionate appointment when the application is made beyond the prescribed time limit under the relevant rules, and no explanation for the delay is provided.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are seeking writ of mandamus seeking directions to the respondents to consider their application for compassionate appointment. The petitioners have not explained as to why they did not apply for compassionate appointment within the prescribed time limit. In the result, the writ petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 3417 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad. The court heard the matter on 27th June 2022 and dismissed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Compassionate Appointment Due to Delay of 12 Years. Petitioners Failed to Apply Within Prescribed Time Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Compassionate Appointment) Rules, 2016.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation of Agreement of Sale Due to Cheque Dishonour — Defendant Ordered to Vacate Premises on Refund of Advance. Agreement Contained Specific Clause That Dishonour of Cheque Would Result in Cancellation and Vacant Po...