Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of NOC for Petrol Pump Due to Misapplication of Distance Norms. Indian Roads Congress Guidelines 2009 Not Applicable to Government Corporation Outlets vis-à-vis Private Company Outlets.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Swaraj Kisanrao Borkar, applied for establishing a petrol pump (retail outlet) under the dealership of Indian Oil Corporation, a Government Corporation. After completing all formalities, including obtaining No Objection Certificates from various departments, the District Magistrate (respondent No.1) granted the NOC. Subsequently, on a complaint that the proposed site was within 300 meters of an existing petrol pump of a private company, proceedings were initiated for cancellation of the NOC. The petitioner contended that the Indian Roads Congress guidelines, which prescribe a minimum distance of 300 meters between two petrol pumps, were not applicable because his outlet was of a Government Corporation, while the other was of a private company. Despite this, the District Magistrate cancelled the NOC by order dated 28.09.2018, and the Divisional Commissioner upheld the cancellation on appeal. The petitioner challenged these orders by way of a writ petition. The High Court analyzed the guidelines and found that they were not intended to apply to outlets of Government Corporations vis-à-vis private companies. The court held that the cancellation was arbitrary and based on a misapplication of the guidelines. The court also noted that the petitioner was not given a proper opportunity to present his case. Consequently, the High Court quashed the impugned orders and restored the NOC granted to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Cancellation of No Objection Certificate - Natural Justice - The District Magistrate cancelled the NOC granted to the petitioner for a petrol pump on the ground of violation of distance norms under Indian Roads Congress guidelines, without properly considering the petitioner's submissions that the guidelines were not applicable to Government Corporation outlets. Held that the cancellation was arbitrary and unsustainable as the guidelines were misapplied (Paras 2-10).

B) Petroleum Laws - Distance Norms for Retail Outlets - Indian Roads Congress Guidelines 2009 - The dispute pertained to whether the distance of 300 meters between two petrol pumps applied when one outlet was of a Government Corporation (Indian Oil Corporation) and the other of a private company. The court held that the guidelines were not intended to apply to such a scenario and the cancellation was erroneous (Paras 3-8).

C) Writ Jurisdiction - Judicial Review of Administrative Orders - The High Court examined the orders of the District Magistrate and Divisional Commissioner cancelling the NOC and found that they had misconstrued the guidelines and failed to give proper opportunity to the petitioner. Held that the impugned orders were liable to be set aside (Paras 9-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of No Objection Certificate (NOC) granted to the petitioner for establishing a petrol pump on the ground of violation of distance norms under Indian Roads Congress guidelines was legally sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders dated 28.09.2018 and 22.02.2019, and restored the NOC granted to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of guidelines
  • cancellation of NOC
  • natural justice
  • distance norms for petrol pumps
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (04) 112

Writ Petition No. 1442 of 2019

2022-04-22

Manish Pitale, J.

Mr. F.T. Mirza for petitioner; Mr. K.L. Dharmadhikari, Addl.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 & 2

Swaraj Kisanrao Borkar

The Collector and District Magistrate, Chandrapur; Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur; Union of India, Through Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of No Objection Certificate for establishing a petrol pump.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders dated 28.09.2018 and 22.02.2019 passed by the District Magistrate and Divisional Commissioner respectively, cancelling the NOC.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's NOC for a petrol pump was cancelled on the ground that the proposed site was within 300 meters of an existing petrol pump, allegedly violating Indian Roads Congress guidelines.

Previous Decisions

The District Magistrate cancelled the NOC on 28.09.2018, and the Divisional Commissioner upheld the cancellation on 22.02.2019.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of NOC on the ground of violation of distance norms under Indian Roads Congress guidelines was legally sustainable. Whether the guidelines applied to a Government Corporation outlet vis-à-vis a private company outlet.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the guidelines were not applicable as his outlet was of a Government Corporation (Indian Oil Corporation) while the other was of a private company. Petitioner contended that the NOC could be cancelled only in specific circumstances and that the proceedings were initiated without proper interpretation of the guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi

The Indian Roads Congress guidelines regarding distance between petrol pumps are not applicable when one outlet is of a Government Corporation and the other is of a private company. Cancellation of NOC based on misapplication of guidelines is arbitrary and unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

By this writ petition and petitioner has challenged orders passed by the District Magistrate and Divisional Commissioner, whereby No Objection Certificate granted to the petitioner to establish a petrol pump stood cancelled, primarily on the ground that it violated norms and guidelines of Indian Roads Congress 2009, as regards distance permissible between two petrol pumps on the same road/carriage way. The facts leading up to filing of the present petition are that the petitioner applied for establishing a petrol pump i.e. a retail outlet under dealership of Indian Oil Corporation.

Procedural History

The petitioner applied for NOC for a petrol pump, which was granted by the District Magistrate. On a complaint, the District Magistrate initiated proceedings and cancelled the NOC on 28.09.2018. The petitioner appealed to the Divisional Commissioner, who upheld the cancellation on 22.02.2019. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Roads Congress Guidelines 2009: Guideline 4.6.1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of NOC for Petrol Pump Due to Misapplication of Distance Norms. Indian Roads Congress Guidelines 2009 Not Applicable to Government Corporation Outlets vis-à-vis Private Company Outlets.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Ex-Employee of WCL Challenging Reduction in Pay Scale Due to Medical Disability. Reduction from Category-IV to Category-I without considering alternative employment in same pay scale violates Clause 9.4.0 of ...