High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Employee Compensation Case — Determines Date of Accident as Relevant for Compensation Calculation Under Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that the Commissioner erred in using the date of adjudication instead of the date of accident for determining compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923, and remanded the matter for fresh calculation.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 19/11/2021 passed by the Commissioner for Employees Compensation & Judge, Labour Court, Buldana, in a claim application under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The claimants, respondent Nos. 1 and 2, are the parents of deceased Anil, who died in an accident on 09/05/2014 while working as a driver for respondent No. 3, the vehicle owner. The vehicle was insured with the appellant. The claimants contended that Anil earned a monthly salary of Rs. 8000/- plus daily bhatta of Rs. 60/- (Rs. 1800/- per month). The Commissioner, based on evidence, found that Anil was employed as a driver and died due to an accident arising out of and in the course of employment. The Commissioner awarded compensation of Rs. 8,22,640/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of accident. The Insurance Company appealed, raising the substantial question of law whether the Commissioner was justified in regarding the date of adjudication as the relevant date for determining compensation under the EC Act. The court admitted the appeal on this question and heard it by consent. The court noted that the Commissioner had used the date of adjudication (19/11/2021) to determine the relevant factor for calculating compensation, whereas the correct date should be the date of accident (09/05/2014). The court held that the relevant date for determination of compensation under the EC Act is the date of accident, not the date of adjudication. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for fresh calculation of compensation based on the date of accident. The court directed the Commissioner to pass a fresh order within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The appeal was allowed accordingly.

Headnote

A) Employees Compensation - Determination of Compensation - Relevant Date - The issue was whether the Commissioner should use the date of accident or date of adjudication for calculating compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 - The court held that the relevant date for determination of compensation is the date of accident, not the date of adjudication - The Commissioner erred in using the date of adjudication - The matter was remanded for fresh calculation (Paras 2, 7-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Commissioner was justified in regarding the date relevant for the determination of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to be the date of adjudication?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 19/11/2021 is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Commissioner for Employees Compensation & Judge, Labour Court, Buldana for fresh calculation of compensation in accordance with law, taking the date of accident as the relevant date. The Commissioner shall pass a fresh order within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

Law Points

  • Date of accident is the relevant date for determination of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • not the date of adjudication
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (04) 108

First Appeal No.271 of 2022

2022-04-19

M.S. Karnik

Ms. A.S. Athalye for appellant, Shri G.R. Kothari for respondent Nos.1 & 2

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Nandkishor Bapurao Shingane, Gahinabai Nandkishor Shingane, Vitthal Bhaguji Kharat

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Commissioner for Employees Compensation awarding compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought to set aside the Commissioner's order on the ground that the Commissioner used the wrong date (date of adjudication) for determining compensation

Filing Reason

The Commissioner used the date of adjudication instead of the date of accident to determine the relevant factor for calculating compensation under the EC Act

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Employees Compensation & Judge, Labour Court, Buldana passed order dated 19/11/2021 awarding compensation of Rs. 8,22,640/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of accident

Issues

Whether the Commissioner was justified in regarding the date relevant for the determination of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to be the date of adjudication?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company) argued that the Commissioner erred in using the date of adjudication instead of the date of accident for determining compensation under the EC Act Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (claimants) did not oppose the appeal on the question of law

Ratio Decidendi

The relevant date for determination of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is the date of accident, not the date of adjudication. The Commissioner erred in using the date of adjudication to determine the relevant factor for calculating compensation.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the Commissioner was justified in regarding the date relevant for the determination of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to be the date of adjudication? The Commissioner has committed an error in regarding the date of adjudication as the relevant date for determination of compensation under the EC Act. The relevant date for determination of compensation under the EC Act is the date of accident.

Procedural History

Claimants filed application under Section 22 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 before the Commissioner for Employees Compensation & Judge, Labour Court, Buldana. The Commissioner passed order dated 19/11/2021 awarding compensation. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.271 of 2022 before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench. The High Court admitted the appeal on the substantial question of law and heard it by consent, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter.

Acts & Sections

  • Employees Compensation Act, 1923: Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants Fail to Prove Exclusive Title Over Suit Property. Court upholds trial court's finding that suit property was joint family property and not self-acquired, dismissing appeal for lack o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corrup...