Bombay High Court Allows Mutation of Co-operative Society's Name in Revenue Records Without Collector's NOC. The court held that insistence on NOC for mutation of a society's name in revenue records for land granted under Rule 43 of Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921 is without authority of law.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Basant Vihar Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged a letter dated 16 February 2021 from the City Survey Officer (CSO), Chembur, refusing to mutate the society's name in revenue records for the subject property without a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Collector. The property was originally granted to Basantrai Motiram under Rule 43 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921, via a Form HH on 27 August 1946. The original owner constructed seventeen flats and two garages, and the society of flat purchasers was registered on 2 October 1967. The legal heirs of the original owner conveyed the property to the society by a registered deed of conveyance dated 22 August 1968. When the society sought redevelopment, it discovered its name was not mutated in revenue records and applied to the CSO for mutation. The CSO refused, citing the need for an NOC from the Collector. The society argued that the property was not 'Government land' and that the CSO's insistence on NOC was without legal basis. The court examined the grant under Rule 43, which was a grant in perpetuity with no reversion to the government. The court held that the CSO's demand for NOC was unwarranted and directed the CSO to mutate the society's name within four weeks from the date of the order. The petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Mutation of Revenue Records - NOC Requirement - Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921, Rule 43; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Section 149 - The court held that the CSO cannot insist on an NOC from the Collector for mutation when the property was granted under Rule 43 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921, and the society has a registered conveyance from the original grantee's legal heirs. The court directed the CSO to mutate the society's name within four weeks. (Paras 1-11)

B) Co-operative Housing Society - Mutation - Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The court noted that the society is the owner of the property and is entitled to have its name recorded in revenue records. The insistence on NOC was held to be without authority of law. (Paras 2-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the City Survey Officer can insist on a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Collector as a pre-condition for mutating the name of a co-operative housing society in revenue records, when the society has acquired the property by a registered conveyance from the original grantee under Rule 43 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned letter/communication dated 16th February 2021 is quashed and set aside. The City Survey Officer, Chembur, is directed to mutate the name of the petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the subject property within four weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Mutation of revenue records
  • NOC requirement
  • land grant under Rule 43 of Bombay Land Revenue Rules
  • 1921
  • Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code
  • 1966
  • Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (02) 76

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 7537 OF 2021

2022-02-14

S.J. Kathawalla, Milind N. Jadhav

Mr. Saket Mone alongwith Mr. Subit Chakrabarti and Mr. Devansh Shah instructed by Vidhii Partners for the Petitioner, Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for the State, Ms. Rupali Adhate for the MCGM

Basant Vihar Co-operative Housing Society Limited

State of Maharashtra (Revenue Department), The Superintendent of Land Records, The City Survey Officer, Chembur, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the refusal of the City Survey Officer to mutate the petitioner's name in revenue records without an NOC from the Collector.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought a direction to the CSO to mutate its name in revenue records without insisting on an NOC from the Collector.

Filing Reason

The CSO refused to mutate the society's name in revenue records for want of an NOC from the Collector, which the society contended was without legal basis.

Issues

Whether the CSO can insist on an NOC from the Collector for mutation of the society's name in revenue records for land granted under Rule 43 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the property was granted in perpetuity under Rule 43 and is not Government land, and the CSO's insistence on NOC is without authority of law. The respondents argued that the NOC from the Collector is required as per the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the property granted under Rule 43 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921, is not Government land and the grantee or his successors-in-interest are entitled to have their names mutated in revenue records without any NOC from the Collector. The CSO's insistence on NOC is without authority of law.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner to challenge the letter/communication dated 16th February 2021 whereby Respondent No. 3, the City Survey Officer, Chembur, has refused to mutate the name of the Petitioner in the revenue records in respect of the subject property, for want of an NOC from the Collector. The court held that the CSO's insistence on NOC from the Collector for mutation is without authority of law.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application to the CSO for mutation of its name in revenue records. The CSO refused by letter dated 16 February 2021. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1921: Rule 43
  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966: Section 149
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 22
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Preparation for Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Meeting of Minds. Conviction under Sections 399 and 402 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the accused assembled with common intention t...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Revenue's Revision Petition in Input Tax Credit Dispute Under KVAT Act — Input Tax Credit Denied for Purchases from Unregistered Dealers. The court held that input tax credit is not available for purchases from unregiste...