Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Family Court Appeal No. 95 of 2014. The court held that the appellant failed to prove grounds of cruelty, desertion, and mental disorder under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant husband, Danesh Madhukarrao Pahade, filed a divorce petition against his wife, Smita Danesh Pahade, under Section 13(1)(i-a), (i-b), and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on grounds of cruelty, desertion, and mental disorder (schizophrenia). The marriage took place on 04.02.1991, and a daughter was born on 06.08.1992. The appellant alleged that the respondent exhibited abnormal behavior from the beginning, including violent outbursts, quarrels, and slapping their daughter, causing her to become unconscious. He claimed she was diagnosed with schizophrenia by Dr. Sudhir Bhave and that her conduct made it impossible to live with her. The respondent denied the allegations and contended that she was treated well initially but later subjected to harassment for dowry. The Family Court dismissed the petition, leading to this appeal. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of Dr. Bhave, who stated that the respondent suffered from schizophrenia but also noted that she was under treatment and could lead a normal life. The court found that the appellant failed to prove cruelty as the incidents were isolated and not of a grave nature. Regarding desertion, the court held that the respondent left due to the appellant's conduct and there was no animus deserendi. On mental disorder, the court held that the medical evidence did not establish that the respondent's condition was so severe that the appellant could not reasonably be expected to live with her. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Family Court's decision.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Divorce - Cruelty - Section 13(1)(i-a) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant alleged cruelty by the respondent wife, including violent behavior, quarrels, and slapping their daughter. The court held that the evidence was insufficient to prove cruelty of such a nature as to cause reasonable apprehension in the mind of the appellant that it would be harmful or injurious to live with the respondent. The isolated incidents did not amount to legal cruelty. (Paras 2-10)

B) Family Law - Divorce - Desertion - Section 13(1)(i-b) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant claimed desertion by the respondent. The court found that the respondent had left the matrimonial home due to the appellant's conduct and that there was no intention on her part to desert. The appellant failed to prove the essential elements of desertion, namely, factum of separation and animus deserendi. (Paras 11-15)

C) Family Law - Divorce - Mental Disorder - Section 13(1)(iii) Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - The appellant sought divorce on the ground that the respondent was suffering from schizophrenia. The court held that the medical evidence, including the testimony of Dr. Sudhir Bhave, did not conclusively prove that the respondent was suffering from schizophrenia of such a kind and degree that the appellant could not reasonably be expected to live with her. The court emphasized that the mental disorder must be of a nature that makes it impossible for the spouse to live together. (Paras 16-25)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant husband is entitled to a decree of divorce on the grounds of cruelty, desertion, and mental disorder (schizophrenia) under Section 13(1)(i-a), (i-b), and (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The judgment and decree dated 07.11.2008 passed by the Family Court No.2, Nagpur is confirmed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Burden of proof in divorce cases
  • Standard of proof for mental disorder as a ground for divorce
  • Cruelty and desertion under Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • Appreciation of medical evidence in matrimonial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 97

Family Court Appeal No. 95 of 2014

2022-01-14

A. S. Chandurkar, G. A. Sanap

Mrs. Padma M. Chandekar for appellant, Mr. U. M. Aurangabadkar for respondent

Danesh Madhukarrao Pahade

Smita Danesh Pahade

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition by Family Court

Remedy Sought

Decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty, desertion, and mental disorder

Filing Reason

Alleged cruelty, desertion, and schizophrenia of wife

Previous Decisions

Family Court No.2, Nagpur dismissed the divorce petition on 07.11.2008

Issues

Whether the appellant proved cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether the appellant proved desertion under Section 13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? Whether the appellant proved that the respondent was suffering from schizophrenia under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that respondent's behavior was violent, she slapped their daughter causing unconsciousness, and she was diagnosed with schizophrenia by Dr. Sudhir Bhave. Respondent denied allegations and claimed she was subjected to harassment for dowry and that she left the matrimonial home due to appellant's conduct.

Ratio Decidendi

For a decree of divorce on the ground of mental disorder under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the mental disorder must be of such a kind and degree that the spouse cannot reasonably be expected to live with the other. The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish the same with cogent evidence. Similarly, cruelty must be of a grave nature causing reasonable apprehension of harm, and desertion requires both factum of separation and animus deserendi.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Judge of the Family Court dismissed the petition, filed by the appellant against the respondent for divorce on the grounds of cruelty, desertion and mental disorder due to schizophrenia as provided under Section 13(1)(i-a)(i-b) and (iii) respectively of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Dr. Bhave on examination opined that the respondent was suffering from Schizophrenia. The court held that the medical evidence did not conclusively prove that the respondent was suffering from schizophrenia of such a kind and degree that the appellant could not reasonably be expected to live with her.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a divorce petition in the Family Court No.2, Nagpur, which was dismissed on 07.11.2008. The appellant then filed this appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. The appeal was heard on 10.12.2021 and judgment pronounced on 14.01.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13(1)(i-a), Section 13(1)(i-b), Section 13(1)(iii)
  • Family Courts Act, 1984: Section 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata. The court held that the question of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be decided at the s...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Personal Promotee Reader for Acting Director Post in U.P. State Universities Act, 1973. Inter Se Seniority Between Direct Recruit and Promotee Determined by Length of Continuous Service in Cadre Under Statute 17.05(...