Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Invalid Order in Scheduled Tribe Certificate Case — Failure to Consider Relevant Documents and Affidavits. Committee's decision set aside for non-application of mind and ignoring documentary evidence of 'Thakur' tribe claim.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Saurabh S/o Ashok Nikam, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, dated 15th December 2021, which invalidated his tribe claim as belonging to the 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The petitioner had submitted various documents including school records, affidavits of relatives, and other evidence to support his claim. The Committee, however, passed the impugned order without considering these documents and without giving the petitioner a proper opportunity to be heard. The High Court observed that the Committee's order suffers from non-application of mind as it failed to take into account the relevant material on record. The court set aside the impugned order and remitted the matter back to the Committee for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to decide the claim afresh after giving the petitioner an opportunity to produce all relevant documents and after considering the same in accordance with law. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Scrutiny - Validity of Committee's Order - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's tribe claim as 'Thakur' (Scheduled Tribe) without considering relevant documents and affidavits - The High Court held that the Committee's order suffers from non-application of mind and is unsustainable - The matter was remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration after giving opportunity to the petitioner to produce all documents (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim as 'Thakur' (Scheduled Tribe) is sustainable when it failed to consider relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 15th December 2021 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration. The Committee shall decide the claim of the petitioner afresh after giving him an opportunity to produce all relevant documents and after considering the same in accordance with law. The petition is allowed. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Non-application of mind
  • Scrutiny of caste claims
  • Consideration of documentary evidence
  • Affidavit evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (01) 4

Writ Petition No.241 of 2022

2022-01-06

S.V. Gangapurwala, S.G. Dige

Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar for petitioner; Mr. P.S. Patil, Addl. GP for respondent/State

Saurabh S/o Ashok Nikam

The State of Maharashtra, Department of Tribal Development; The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the decision of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 15th December 2021 and direction to the Committee to reconsider the claim.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's tribe claim as 'Thakur' (Scheduled Tribe) without considering relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Previous Decisions

The Scrutiny Committee passed the impugned order on 15th December 2021 invalidating the claim.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's tribe claim is sustainable when it failed to consider relevant documents and affidavits.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Committee did not consider the documents and affidavits submitted by him. Respondent/State supported the Committee's decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee's order suffers from non-application of mind as it failed to consider the relevant documents and affidavits submitted by the petitioner. The order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned decision of the Scheduled Tribes Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad – respondent no.2 dated 15th December, 2021 invalidating the tribe claim of the petitioner as belonging to 'Thakur' Scheduled Tribe. The impugned order suffers from non-application of mind. The Committee has not considered the documents and the affidavits submitted by the petitioner.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the Scrutiny Committee's order dated 15th December 2021. The petition was heard at the admission stage with consent of both parties and was finally disposed of on 6th January 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Pay Scale for Untrained Teachers, Overrules Earlier Benches' Judgments. The court held that untrained teachers are not entitled to the pay scale of trained teachers, and the earlier judgments granting such reli...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Invalid Order in Scheduled Tribe Certificate Case — Failure to Consider Relevant Documents and Affidavits. Committee's decision set aside for non-application of mind and ignori...