Bombay High Court Quashes ECI Certificate Refusing Bye-Election for Pune Parliamentary Constituency — Mandates Immediate Notification Under Section 149 RoPA. Section 151A(b) Cannot Be Used to Indefinitely Postpone Bye-Election; ECI's Discretion Is Limited to Fixing Date, Not Deciding Whether to Hold Election.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Sughosh Joshi, a registered voter in Pune parliamentary constituency and Kothrud legislative assembly constituency, filed a writ petition challenging a certificate dated 23rd August 2023 issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI) under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (RoPA). The certificate stated that the ECI had 'difficulty' in holding a bye-election to the Parliamentary Constituency–34 Pune. The Pune parliamentary seat had fallen vacant on 29th March 2023 due to the demise of the then elected MP, Shri Girish Bhalchandra Bapat, and a Lok Sabha Secretariat notification had been issued notifying the vacancy. The Petitioner argued that under Section 149 of RoPA, once a casual vacancy arises, the Election Commission is under a mandatory duty to call a bye-election. The ECI contended that Section 151A(b) allowed it to postpone the bye-election if it faced difficulty in holding it. The Court analyzed the language of Section 149, which uses the word 'shall', indicating a mandatory obligation to fill the vacancy. The Court held that Section 151A(b) only relates to the timing of the bye-election, not to the decision to hold it. The word 'difficulty' in Section 151A(b) refers to practical difficulties in conducting the election on a particular date, not to a discretion to refuse to hold the election altogether. The Court quashed the certificate and directed the ECI to issue a notification under Section 149 of RoPA forthwith to hold the bye-election for the Pune parliamentary constituency. The Court emphasized that the right to representation is a constitutional right and the ECI cannot use administrative convenience to indefinitely postpone a bye-election.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Representation - Article 326 read with Article 81 of the Constitution of India - Mandatory Duty to Hold Bye-Election - The right of citizens to elect their representatives is a fundamental feature of democracy. The Election Commission is under a constitutional and statutory duty to fill casual vacancies in the House of the People without undue delay. (Paras 1-5)

B) Election Law - Casual Vacancy - Section 149 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 - Mandatory Obligation - Section 149 uses the word 'shall', imposing a mandatory duty on the Election Commission to call upon the constituency to elect a person to fill a casual vacancy. The provision does not confer any discretion to decide whether to hold the election. (Paras 7-9)

C) Election Law - Bye-Election - Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 - Scope of 'Difficulty' - The word 'difficulty' in Section 151A(b) refers only to the timing of the bye-election, not to the decision to hold it. The Election Commission cannot use this provision to indefinitely postpone or refuse to hold a bye-election. The certificate issued under this section cannot override the mandatory duty under Section 149. (Paras 10-12)

D) Election Law - Discretion of Election Commission - Limits of Discretion - The Election Commission's discretion under Section 151A(b) is limited to fixing the date of the bye-election within a reasonable time. It cannot refuse to hold the election altogether. The Commission's administrative convenience or difficulty cannot defeat the constitutional right of representation. (Paras 13-15)

E) Election Law - Validity of Certificate - Quashing of Certificate - The certificate dated 23rd August 2023 issued by the Election Commission under Section 151A(b) stating 'difficulty' in holding the bye-election for Pune Parliamentary Constituency is held to be invalid and is quashed. The Election Commission is directed to issue a notification under Section 149 of the RoPA forthwith. (Paras 16-18)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Election Commission of India can refuse to hold a bye-election for a vacant parliamentary seat by issuing a certificate under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 citing 'difficulty' in holding the election, and whether such a certificate is valid and binding.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court quashed the certificate dated 23rd August 2023 issued by the Election Commission of India under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The Court directed the Election Commission to issue a notification under Section 149 of the RoPA forthwith to hold a bye-election for the Pune parliamentary constituency.

Law Points

  • Section 149 of the Representation of People Act
  • 1951 imposes a mandatory duty on the Election Commission to call a bye-election when a casual vacancy arises
  • Section 151A(b) does not confer discretion to refuse to hold a bye-election
  • the word 'difficulty' in Section 151A(b) relates only to the timing of the election
  • not to the decision to hold it
  • the Election Commission cannot rely on administrative convenience to indefinitely postpone a bye-election
  • the right to representation is a constitutional right under Article 326 read with Article 81 of the Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (12) 134

Writ Petition No. 14242 of 2023

2023-12-13

G.S. Patel, Kamal Khata

2023:BHC-AS:37826-DB

Kushal Mor, Shraddha Swarup, Dayaar Singla, Pravin Singh; Pradeep Rajagopal, Drishti Shah, Rekha Rajagopal

Sughosh Joshi

Election Commission of India & Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a certificate issued by the Election Commission of India under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 refusing to hold a bye-election for the Pune parliamentary constituency.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the certificate dated 23rd August 2023 and direction to the Election Commission to issue a notification under Section 149 of the RoPA to hold a bye-election.

Filing Reason

The Petitioner, a registered voter, sought to enforce the mandatory duty of the Election Commission to fill the casual vacancy in the Pune parliamentary constituency caused by the demise of the sitting MP.

Issues

Whether the Election Commission of India can refuse to hold a bye-election for a vacant parliamentary seat by issuing a certificate under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 citing 'difficulty' in holding the election. Whether such a certificate is valid and binding.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Under Section 149 of RoPA, once a casual vacancy arises, the Election Commission is under a mandatory duty to call a bye-election. The certificate under Section 151A(b) cannot override this duty. Respondent: Section 151A(b) allows the Election Commission to postpone the bye-election if it faces difficulty in holding it.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 149 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 imposes a mandatory duty on the Election Commission to call a bye-election when a casual vacancy arises. Section 151A(b) only relates to the timing of the bye-election, not to the decision to hold it. The word 'difficulty' in Section 151A(b) refers to practical difficulties in conducting the election on a particular date, not to a discretion to refuse to hold the election altogether. The Election Commission cannot use administrative convenience to indefinitely postpone a bye-election.

Judgment Excerpts

The facts are not contentious. The Petitioner, Sughosh Joshi, a registered voter in the Pune parliamentary constituency and Kothrud Legislative Assembly constituency. In this Petition, he challenges a 'certificate' dated 23rd August 2023 issued by the Election Commission of India ('ECI'), the 1st Respondent, said to be under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 ('RoPA'). Shortly stated, this 'certificate' says that the Election Commission has 'difficulty' in holding a bye-election to the Parliamentary Constituency–34 Pune. This constituency is unrepresented and the parliamentary seat for this constituency is vacant since 29th March 2023 on account of the demise of the then elected Member of Parliament for Pune, the late Shri Girish Bhalchandra Bapat. The first submission is based on Section 149 of RoPA. Section 149 uses the word 'shall', imposing a mandatory duty on the Election Commission to call upon the constituency to elect a person to fill a casual vacancy. The word 'difficulty' in Section 151A(b) refers only to the timing of the bye-election, not to the decision to hold it. The Election Commission cannot use this provision to indefinitely postpone or refuse to hold a bye-election.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging a certificate dated 23rd August 2023 issued by the Election Commission of India under Section 151A(b) of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The petition was heard on 13th December 2023 and disposed of with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Representation of People Act, 1951: 149, 151A(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes ECI Certificate Refusing Bye-Election for Pune Parliamentary Constituency — Mandates Immediate Notification Under Section 149 RoPA. Section 151A(b) Cannot Be Used to Indefinitely Postpone Bye-Election; ECI's Discretion Is ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands Case for Fresh Measurement by Court Commissioner. Courts below erred in discarding survey evidence and rejecting application for appointment of Commissioner under Order XXVI...