Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Quashes Notice as Barred by Limitation and Lacking Fresh Material. Reopening beyond four years requires failure to disclose material facts, and reopening on same material as original assessment is impermissible change of opinion.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, DCW Limited, challenged a notice dated 30th June 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen its assessment for Assessment Year 2014-15. The original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016 after scrutiny. The reopening notice was issued beyond four years from the end of the assessment year, and the reasons recorded merely stated that the assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80IA of the Act which was allowed without proper verification. The petitioner contended that the notice was barred by limitation under Section 149 of the Act as there was no failure to disclose material facts, and that the reopening was based on a change of opinion since the issue was already examined during the original assessment. The Revenue argued that the notice was within limitation and that there was sufficient reason to believe that income had escaped assessment. The court analyzed the provisions of Sections 147, 148, and 149 of the Act and held that since the notice was issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the proviso to Section 147 required that there be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts fully and truly. The reasons recorded did not contain any such allegation. Additionally, the court found that the issue of deduction under Section 80IA had been considered during the original assessment, and reopening on the same material amounted to a change of opinion. The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the notice.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 148, 149, 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Limitation - Notice issued beyond four years from end of assessment year is barred by limitation unless there is failure to disclose material facts fully and truly - Held that the notice was issued beyond the period of four years and there was no allegation of failure to disclose, hence the notice is invalid (Paras 5-8).

B) Income Tax - Reopening of Assessment - Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 - Change of Opinion - Reopening based on same material as considered in original assessment under Section 143(3) amounts to change of opinion - Held that the Assessing Officer had considered the issue during original assessment and reopening on same material is not permissible (Paras 9-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening of assessment beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year is valid when the original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) and there is no allegation of failure to disclose material facts fully and truly.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition allowed. Notice dated 30th June 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Law Points

  • Limitation for reopening assessment under Section 148
  • Section 149 of Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Requirement of fresh tangible material for reopening
  • Distinction between change of opinion and fresh material
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (11) 65

Writ Petition No. 1250 of 2022

2023-11-10

K. R. Shriram, Dr. Neela Gokhale

Mr. Sukhsagar Syal a/w Mr. P. C. Tripathi i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Petitioner, Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondents-Revenue

DCW Limited

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 3(4), Mumbai & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening of assessment

Remedy Sought

Quashing of notice dated 30th June 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Filing Reason

Notice issued beyond four years from end of assessment year without allegation of failure to disclose material facts, and based on change of opinion

Previous Decisions

Original assessment completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016

Issues

Whether the notice under Section 148 issued beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year is valid when there is no allegation of failure to disclose material facts fully and truly. Whether the reopening of assessment based on the same material considered in the original assessment under Section 143(3) amounts to a change of opinion and is impermissible.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The notice is barred by limitation under Section 149 as it was issued beyond four years and there is no failure to disclose material facts; the reopening is based on a change of opinion as the issue was examined in original assessment. Respondent: The notice is within limitation and there is sufficient reason to believe that income has escaped assessment; the assessee failed to disclose material facts.

Ratio Decidendi

For reopening assessment beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, the proviso to Section 147 requires that there must be a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts fully and truly. If the reasons recorded do not contain such an allegation, the notice is invalid. Additionally, reopening based on the same material that was considered during the original assessment under Section 143(3) amounts to a change of opinion and is not permissible under Section 147.

Judgment Excerpts

The notice under Section 148 was issued on 30th June 2021, which is beyond the period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year 2014-15. The reasons recorded do not contain any allegation that the assessee failed to disclose material facts fully and truly. The issue of deduction under Section 80IA was considered during the original assessment and reopening on the same material is a change of opinion.

Procedural History

Original assessment for AY 2014-15 completed under Section 143(3) on 29th December 2016. Notice under Section 148 issued on 30th June 2021. Petitioner filed writ petition challenging the notice.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 147, Section 148, Section 149, Section 80IA, Section 143(3)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Liberal Approach to Amendment Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Upheld. The court held that the test of due diligence must be applied liberally, especially when...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes of Application After Full Satisfaction of Settlement Amount in State Trading Corporation Case. All criminal and civil proceedings arising from settlement agreements quashed upon payment of Rs. 600 crores with interest.