Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Domestic Violence Case — Customary Marriage Recognized as Domestic Relationship. Applicant wife held entitled to maintain petition under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 despite marriage being performed as per 'sate-lote' custom, as the relationship falls within 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sau. Anita Ambadas @ Ambu Shivarkar, filed a criminal revision application challenging the judgment and order dated 17.08.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Buldhana, which dismissed her appeal against the order dated 13.01.2015 of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2nd Court, Buldhana. The Magistrate had dismissed her application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The applicant and non-applicants belong to the Vaidu community, which has a custom of 'sate-lote' (exchange of daughters in marriage between two families). The applicant's marriage was solemnized with non-applicant no.1 (her maternal uncle) in 1998 as per this custom. Earlier, non-applicant no.1 had married the applicant's cousin Gangabai, but that marriage ended in divorce. Non-applicant no.1 later married non-applicant no.2 in 1983 and had two children. The applicant alleged domestic violence and filed an application under Section 12 of the DV Act. The Magistrate dismissed the application on the ground that the marriage was not valid as it was between close relatives (uncle and niece) and thus not a 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the DV Act. The Sessions Judge upheld this dismissal. The High Court considered the issue of whether the marriage performed as per the custom of 'sate-lote' constitutes a 'domestic relationship' under the DV Act. The court noted that Section 2(f) of the DV Act defines 'domestic relationship' broadly to include relationships in the nature of marriage. The court held that the marriage, even if not valid under personal law, may still be a relationship in the nature of marriage if the parties lived together as husband and wife. The court found that the courts below had erred in dismissing the application without considering the broader definition under the DV Act. The High Court allowed the revision application, set aside the orders of the courts below, and remanded the matter to the Magistrate for fresh consideration on merits, directing the Magistrate to decide the application afresh in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Domestic Violence - Customary Marriage - Section 2(f) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - The issue was whether a marriage performed as per the custom of 'sate-lote' in the Vaidu community constitutes a 'domestic relationship' under the DV Act. The court held that the relationship between the applicant and non-applicant no.1, being a marriage performed as per custom, falls within the definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the DV Act, which includes relationships in the nature of marriage. The court set aside the orders of the courts below and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits. (Paras 1-10)

B) Family Law - Domestic Violence - Maintainability of Application - Section 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - The courts below had dismissed the applicant's application under Section 12 of the DV Act on the ground that the marriage was not valid. The High Court held that the definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) is broad and includes relationships in the nature of marriage, and thus the applicant's application was maintainable. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the marriage performed as per the custom of 'sate-lote' in the Vaidu community constitutes a 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, thereby entitling the applicant to maintain an application under Section 12 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the revision application, set aside the judgment and order dated 17.08.2018 of the Sessions Judge and the order dated 13.01.2015 of the Judicial Magistrate, and remanded the matter to the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2nd Court, Buldhana for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Domestic relationship includes marriage performed as per custom
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005 Section 2(f) includes relationships in the nature of marriage
  • Customary marriage 'sate-lote' recognized as valid marriage for DV Act purposes
  • Revision against dismissal of DV Act application allowed
  • Matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 225

Criminal Revision Application No. 96 of 2019

2023-10-19

G. A. Sanap, J.

2023:BHC-NAG:15380

Mr. Akshay Pandya for applicant, Mr. Pushkar Deshpande for non-applicants

Sau. Anita Ambadas @ Ambu Shivarkar

Ambadas @ Ambu Mallu Shivarkar & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application challenging dismissal of application under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Remedy Sought

The applicant sought to set aside the orders of the courts below and to have her application under Section 12 of the DV Act restored for fresh consideration on merits.

Filing Reason

The applicant alleged domestic violence by the non-applicants and filed an application under Section 12 of the DV Act, which was dismissed by the Magistrate on the ground that the marriage was not valid and thus no domestic relationship existed.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2nd Court, Buldhana dismissed the application on 13.01.2015. The Sessions Judge, Buldhana dismissed the appeal on 17.08.2018.

Issues

Whether the marriage performed as per the custom of 'sate-lote' constitutes a 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Whether the applicant's application under Section 12 of the DV Act was maintainable.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the marriage was performed as per the custom of 'sate-lote' and thus constitutes a domestic relationship under the DV Act. The non-applicants argued that the marriage was not valid as it was between close relatives and thus no domestic relationship existed.

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'domestic relationship' under Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 is broad and includes relationships in the nature of marriage. A marriage performed as per custom, even if not valid under personal law, may still be a relationship in the nature of marriage if the parties lived together as husband and wife. Therefore, the applicant's application under Section 12 of the DV Act was maintainable.

Judgment Excerpts

In this revision application, challenge is to the judgment and order dated 17.08.2018 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Buldhana whereby learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the applicant against the judgment and order dated 13.01.2015, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2nd Court, Buldhana. The applicant and the non-applicants belong to Vaidu community. Non-applicant nos.1 and 5 are the brothers. Deceased mother of the applicant was the sister of non-applicant nos.1 and 5. Non-applicant no.2 is the wife of non-applicant no.1. Non-applicant nos.3 and 4 are the children of non-applicant nos.1 and 2. Non-applicant no.6 is the son of non-applicant no.5. Non-applicant no.1 is the maternal uncle of the applicant. According to the applicant, in Vaidu community, there is a custom of 'sate-lote' (giving of daughter in marriage in families of two relatives). Marriage of the applicant was solemnized with non-applicant no.1 as per the custom of sate-lote in 1998.

Procedural History

The applicant filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 2nd Court, Buldhana, which was dismissed on 13.01.2015. The applicant appealed to the Sessions Judge, Buldhana, who dismissed the appeal on 17.08.2018. The applicant then filed the present criminal revision application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, which was allowed on 19.10.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Section 2(f), Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize En...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a truck; Tribunal's award of Rs.75,000/- enhanced to Rs.1,50,000/- with interest. Notional income of deceased assessed at Rs.1,500/- ...