Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Parole for Medical Treatment of Wife and Mother-in-Law. Parole Granted for 45 Days with Conditions, Including Reporting to Police and Not Leaving Jurisdiction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Aslam Salim Shaikh, a convict serving a life sentence at Yerwada Central Prison, Pune, filed a criminal writ petition seeking parole for 45 days to arrange medical treatment for his wife and mother-in-law. The petitioner had been convicted under the Indian Penal Code and was undergoing imprisonment. The petitioner's wife and mother-in-law were suffering from serious medical conditions requiring treatment. The petitioner had previously been released on parole but had surrendered on time. The State opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner had a criminal background and that parole should not be granted. The court considered the submissions and held that parole is a reformative and humanitarian measure, and that the petitioner's request for medical treatment of family members was a valid ground. The court directed the petitioner to be released on parole for 45 days, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond, reporting to the police station once a week, and not leaving the jurisdiction of Pune District. The court also clarified that the parole period could be extended by the State Government under the relevant rules. The judgment emphasized that parole is not a suspension of sentence but a temporary release for a specific purpose.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Parole - Medical Treatment of Family Members - Parole is a reformative and humanitarian measure, not a suspension of sentence - The petitioner-convict sought parole for 45 days to arrange medical treatment for his wife and mother-in-law - The court held that parole can be granted for such purposes, and the authorities must consider the application liberally - The court directed the petitioner to be released on parole for 45 days with conditions, including reporting to the police station once a week and not leaving the jurisdiction of Pune District (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner-convict is entitled to be released on parole for the medical treatment of his wife and mother-in-law, and whether the conditions imposed by the authorities are reasonable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to be released on parole for a period of 45 days, subject to conditions including furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000, reporting to the police station once a week, and not leaving the jurisdiction of Pune District. The parole period could be extended by the State Government under the relevant rules.

Law Points

  • Parole is a reformative and humanitarian measure
  • not a suspension of sentence
  • Parole can be granted for medical treatment of family members
  • Conditions for parole include reporting to police and not leaving jurisdiction
  • Parole period can be extended by the State Government under relevant rules
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (07) 80

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3157 of 2022

2023-07-17

Revati Mohite Dere, Gauri Godse

2023:BHC-AS:19901-DB

Ms. Gazala R. Shaikh for the Petitioner, Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondents – State

Aslam Salim Shaikh

The State of Maharashtra, The Superintendent of Jail, Yerwada Central Prison, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking parole for medical treatment of family members.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner-convict sought release on parole for 45 days to arrange medical treatment for his wife and mother-in-law.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's wife and mother-in-law were suffering from serious medical conditions requiring treatment, and the petitioner needed to arrange their medical care.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner had previously been released on parole and had surrendered on time. The authorities had not yet decided on the parole application.

Issues

Whether the petitioner-convict is entitled to be released on parole for the medical treatment of his wife and mother-in-law. Whether the conditions imposed by the authorities are reasonable.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that his wife and mother-in-law were suffering from serious medical conditions and required his presence to arrange treatment. He had a good record of surrendering on time after previous paroles. The State opposed the petition, arguing that the petitioner had a criminal background and that parole should not be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

Parole is a reformative and humanitarian measure, not a suspension of sentence. It can be granted for medical treatment of family members. The authorities must consider parole applications liberally, and conditions imposed must be reasonable and not overly restrictive.

Judgment Excerpts

Parole is a reformative and humanitarian measure, not a suspension of sentence. The petitioner's wife and mother-in-law are suffering from serious medical conditions and require treatment. The petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of 45 days.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking parole. The petition was heard by a Division Bench comprising Revati Mohite Dere and Gauri Godse, JJ. The court reserved judgment on 16th June 2023 and pronounced it on 17th July 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973:
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860:
  • Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Salary Grants to Aided School Teachers. State Directed to Consider Grant-in-Aid Applications Without Insisting on NOC from Management Under Karnataka Education Act, 1983.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Part and Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Upheld with Reduced Deduction for Small Landholders. Court Relies on Precedent for Same...