Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Will Dispute Between Surviving Heirs. Arbitration clause in last Will and testament of deceased father invoked for disputes over locker jewellery allegedly removed by respondent.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Ashwin Maganlal Savani, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes with the respondent, Himadri Davda, arising out of the last Will and Testament of their deceased father, Maganlal Savani. The father died on 25.05.2017, leaving a Will dated 02.07.2016, which appointed the applicant as the Sole Executor and trustee. Probate was granted by the Bombay High Court on 26.03.2018. Subsequently, the parties entered into three agreements: a Deed of Family Understanding, a Deed of Gift, and a Declaration-cum-Possession receipt, all dated 02.12.2017, to administer part of the estate. The applicant alleged that the respondent had accessed a joint bank locker after the father's death and removed jewellery belonging to the estate, which under a residual clause of the Will was bequeathed to the applicant. The respondent opposed the application, contending that the arbitration clause in the Will was not an arbitration agreement between the parties and that the disputes were not arbitrable. The Court, after hearing both sides, held that the arbitration clause in the Will constituted an arbitration agreement between the heirs and that the disputes fell within its scope. The Court appointed a retired judge of the Bombay High Court as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, including the issue of the jewellery and other claims arising from the Will and the subsequent agreements.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Arbitration Clause in Will - The applicant, a surviving heir and executor, sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under an arbitration clause in the last Will of the deceased father to resolve disputes with the respondent, another surviving heir, regarding alleged removal of jewellery from a bank locker. The Court held that the arbitration clause in the Will constitutes an arbitration agreement between the parties and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes. (Paras 1-22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an arbitration clause contained in a Will can be invoked for disputes between the surviving heirs regarding the estate, and whether the Court should appoint a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application and appointed a Sole Arbitrator (a retired judge of the Bombay High Court) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising from the Will and the subsequent agreements.

Law Points

  • Arbitration clause in Will
  • Appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • Existence of arbitration agreement
  • Disputes between heirs
  • Executor and trustee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 61

Commercial Arbitration Application (L) No.9910 of 2021

2023-06-27

Bharati Dangre

Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud, Juhi Valia i/b Jayakar & Partners for Applicant; Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Ativ Patel, Alok Patel i/b Mahendra Patel & Associates for Respondent

Ashwin Maganlal Savani

Himadri Davda

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a Sole Arbitrator pursuant to an arbitration clause in a Will.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between the applicant and respondent arising from the Will and subsequent agreements.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the two surviving heirs regarding the estate, particularly the alleged removal of jewellery from a bank locker by the respondent after the father's death.

Previous Decisions

Probate of the Will was granted by the Bombay High Court on 26.03.2018.

Issues

Whether the arbitration clause in the Will constitutes an arbitration agreement between the parties. Whether the disputes raised are arbitrable under the said clause.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant: The arbitration clause in the Will is binding on the heirs and the disputes regarding the estate, including the jewellery, fall within its scope. Respondent: The arbitration clause is not an agreement between the parties and the disputes are not arbitrable.

Ratio Decidendi

An arbitration clause contained in a Will constitutes an arbitration agreement between the heirs and is enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes relating to the estate.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Application seek appointment of Sole Arbitrator in terms of a clause contained in the last Will and testament of Mr.Maganlal Savani... The Applicant and the Respondent are two surviving heirs of late Maganlal, who died on 25.05.2017, leaving behind his last Will and Testament dated 02.07.2016.

Procedural History

The applicant filed the application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on an unspecified date. The respondent filed a reply. The matter was heard on 13th June 2023 and judgment pronounced on 27th June 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Monitors CBI Investigation in Hathras Gang-Rape and Murder Case — Fair Investigation and Witness Protection Ordered. The Court directed the State to provide threefold security to the victim's family and noted that the CBI investigatio...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Remands for Fresh Compensation Determination. Mere Survey Entries Do Not Establish Tenancy Under Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1976.