Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Statutory Notice Not Issued in Time. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant-complainant filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent-accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The trial court (JMFC Court No. 9, Pune) had acquitted the accused by judgment dated 27/01/1999, primarily on the ground that the mandatory statutory notice was not issued within 15 days of the complainant receiving information of dishonour, as required by the proviso to Section 138. The complainant challenged this finding, arguing that the notice was in fact issued in time. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the complainant had not proved the date on which he received the information of dishonour, nor the date of dispatch of the notice. The court noted that the burden was on the complainant to establish compliance with the statutory requirement, and he had failed to do so. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the acquittal. The court did not examine the other ingredients of the offence as the failure to prove timely notice was sufficient to uphold the acquittal.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Statutory Notice - Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The issue was whether the complainant had issued the mandatory statutory notice within 15 days of receiving information of dishonour. The trial court acquitted the accused on the ground that the notice was not issued in time. The High Court upheld the acquittal, holding that the complainant failed to prove that the notice was dispatched within the prescribed period. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial magistrate was correct in observing that the statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not given in time from the date of information as to dishonour.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; acquittal of the accused upheld.

Law Points

  • Statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be issued within 15 days of receipt of information of dishonour
  • burden of proof on complainant to show timely notice
  • acquittal upheld if notice not proved to be in time
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 60

Criminal Appeal No. 714 of 2003

2023-04-17

S. M. Modak, J.

Adv. Aditya Kharkar i/by Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Appellant, Ms. Bhakti A. Gadamagaonkar for the Respondent No. 1, Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent No. 2-State

Dhanraj Balkrishna Khond

Jagannath Sudam Sonawane and Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against acquittal for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act

Remedy Sought

Appellant-complainant sought conviction of the accused for dishonour of cheque

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the trial court's acquittal on the ground that the statutory notice was issued in time

Previous Decisions

Trial court acquitted the accused by judgment dated 27/01/1999 on the ground that statutory notice was not issued in time

Issues

Whether the trial magistrate was correct in observing that the statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not given in time from the date of information as to dishonour

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the statutory notice was given in time Respondent argued that the notice was not issued within 15 days of dishonour

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant must prove that the statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was issued within 15 days of receiving information of dishonour; failure to do so results in acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

Though the small but technical issue has arisen in this appeal... the issue involved in this appeal is 'whether trial magistrate was correct in observing that statutory notice was not given in time from the date of information as to dishonour?'

Procedural History

The trial court (JMFC Court No. 9, Pune) acquitted the accused on 27/01/1999. The complainant appealed to the High Court of Bombay, which dismissed the appeal on 17/04/2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: Section 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Statutory Notice Not Issued in Time. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld as Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Notice Within 15 Days of Dishonour Under Section 138 of the Negoti...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Disability Certificate Under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Despite Non-Update of System. Court Holds That Administrative Inconvenience Cannot Deny Statutory Right to Disability Certificate Under S...