Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Settlement and Simple Injuries — Section 307 IPC Not Attracted as No Intention to Cause Death Established. FIR under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed where injuries were simple and parties had settled the dispute.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 183/2019 registered at Bhingar Camp Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 307, 323, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR was based on a complaint by Taufique Shaikh, who alleged that on 5 February 2019, when he tried to prevent persons from taking articles from his uncle's property, the two applicants assaulted him with wooden logs and sugarcane. The court examined the injury certificate, which showed only simple injuries. The first informant filed a reply affidavit stating that the dispute between the applicants and his uncle's family had been settled and that he had no intention to give evidence. The Sessions Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the applicants. Considering the nature of injuries, the settlement, and the absence of any criminal antecedents of the applicants, the High Court held that the relief of quashing should be granted. The application was allowed, and the FIR was quashed in terms of prayer clause 'B'. Rule was made absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Settlement between parties - FIR under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed where injuries were simple and parties had settled the dispute, with no intention to cause death established (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC should be quashed given the settlement between parties and the simple nature of injuries.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. FIR No. 183/2019 registered at Bhingar Camp Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC is quashed. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Settlement between parties
  • Simple injuries
  • Section 307 IPC not attracted
  • No criminal antecedents
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (06) 40

Criminal Application No.1757 of 2019

2019-06-27

T.V. Nalawade, K.K. Sonawane

Mr. Narwade Narayan B. for Applicants, Mr. R. D. Sanap APP for Respondents, Mr. Sudheer R. Zambare for Respondent No.2

Abdul Rahim Abdul Shaikh and Another

The State of Maharashtra and Another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 183/2019 registered at Bhingar Camp Police Station, Ahmednagar for offences under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC.

Filing Reason

The applicants sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that the dispute had been settled with the first informant and the injuries were simple, not attracting Section 307 IPC.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Court had granted anticipatory bail to the applicants.

Issues

Whether the FIR under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC should be quashed given the settlement between parties and the simple nature of injuries.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the dispute was settled and the first informant had no intention to proceed. The first informant filed an affidavit stating the dispute was settled and he did not wish to give evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the injuries are simple and the parties have settled the dispute, and there are no criminal antecedents, the FIR under Section 307 IPC and other sections can be quashed to secure the ends of justice.

Judgment Excerpts

This Court has seen the injury certificate. It shows that simple injuries were sustained by the first informant. Considering the nature of injuries and circumstances that there are no bad antecedent of the applicants, this Court holds that relief needs to be given.

Procedural History

The applicants filed Criminal Application No. 1757 of 2019 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No. 183/2019. The Sessions Court had earlier granted anticipatory bail to the applicants. The High Court heard the matter on 27 June 2019 and allowed the application, quashing the FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 307, 323, 504, 506
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Upholds Decree for Possession in Encroachment Dispute, Dismisses Defendants' Second Appeal on Ground of Lack of Adverse Possession. Defendants Failed to Plead and Prove Starting Point of Adverse Possession and Hostile Animus as Required Un...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Settlement and Simple Injuries — Section 307 IPC Not Attracted as No Intention to Cause Death Established. FIR under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 IPC quashed where injuries were simple and parties...