Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Wife Due to Birth of Daughters. Section 302 IPC Conviction Confirmed as Evidence of Motive and Last Seen Theory Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Shaikh Nabab Shaikh Khajamiya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for the murder of his wife, Shaikh Taslim, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case was that the appellant married Taslim in 2003, and they had four children, all daughters. The appellant was dissatisfied with the birth of daughters and started harassing Taslim, demanding a son. About 2½ months before the incident, the appellant left Taslim at her parental home, but later took her back to Parali. Eight days before the FIR, the appellant took Taslim to Parali. On 1st October 2012, the informant (Taslim's brother) lodged a report that Taslim had been murdered. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including motive (dissatisfaction over daughters), last seen together, and recovery of the dead body. The trial court convicted the appellant. The High Court, on appeal, examined the evidence and found that the motive was clearly established, and the last seen theory was corroborated by witnesses. The court held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Motive - Last Seen Theory - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on motive of dissatisfaction over birth of daughters and last seen evidence - Held that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant (Paras 1-20).

B) Criminal Law - Dowry Death - Section 304B IPC - Not applicable as death occurred within 7 years of marriage but no evidence of dowry demand - Held that Section 304B was not attracted (Paras 2-5).

C) Criminal Law - Cruelty by Husband - Section 498A IPC - Evidence of harassment for bringing insufficient dowry and for giving birth to daughters - Held that cruelty was established but the main charge was murder (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his wife is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence, including motive and last seen theory.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 302 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Motive
  • Last Seen Theory
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Dowry Death
  • Section 304B IPC
  • Section 498A IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 32

Criminal Appeal No.147 of 2016

2023-04-19

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Y.G. Khobragade

Mr. A.S. Usmanpurkar (for appellant), Mr. A.M. Phule (A.P.P. for respondent)

Shaikh Nabab Shaikh Khajamiya

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No.95 of 2012 on 22nd August 2013.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on circumstantial evidence. Whether the motive and last seen theory are sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the evidence was insufficient and that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Respondent argued that the chain of circumstances was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and must point only to the guilt of the accused. Motive and last seen theory, when corroborated by other evidence, can form the basis for conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Present Appeal has been filed by the original accused No.1 challenging his conviction by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai in Sessions Case No.95 of 2012 on 22nd August 2013, thereby holding him guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month. The prosecution story is that one Shaikh Shoukat Shaikh Gaffar, resident of Majalgaon lodged a report with Parali Police Station on 1st October 2012.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, on 22nd August 2013 in Sessions Case No.95 of 2012. He appealed to the Bombay High Court, which heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 19th April 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 304B, 498A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder of Wife Due to Birth of Daughters. Section 302 IPC Conviction Confirmed as Evidence of Motive and Last Seen Theory Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Petition in Eviction Suit Under Bombay Rent Act — Bonafide Requirement, Non-User, and Nuisance Not Proved. Concurrent findings of trial and appellate courts upheld that landlords failed to establish grounds fo...