Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deletion of Names from Voters List in Co-operative Society Election. Deletion of names from provisional voters list for being defaulters under Sections 73(CA)(1), 75(2) and 27(10) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 set aside for violation of natural justice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, 20 individuals who are members of Vivid Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha, Betmogra, challenged an order dated 10.03.2023 passed by the Taluka Returning Officer and Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Society, Mukhed (respondent no.2) deleting their names from the provisional voters list for the election of the society. The deletion was on the ground that the petitioners were defaulters under Sections 73(CA)(1), 75(2) and 27(10) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioners contended that the impugned order was passed without giving them any opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court observed that the order was passed ex-parte and no notice or hearing was afforded to the petitioners before deletion. The court held that the order cannot be sustained as it violates natural justice. The court set aside the impugned order and directed the respondents to hear the petitioners before taking any further action in the matter. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Election - Voters List - Deletion of Names - Natural Justice - The Taluka Returning Officer deleted the names of the petitioners from the provisional voters list for being defaulters under Sections 73(CA)(1), 75(2) and 27(10) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The court held that the order deleting the names is in violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same, directing the respondents to hear the petitioners before taking any further action. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deletion of the petitioners' names from the provisional voters list by the Taluka Returning Officer without giving them an opportunity of hearing is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 10.03.2023 passed by respondent no.2 is set aside. The respondents are directed to hear the petitioners before taking any further action in the matter. Rule made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • opportunity of hearing
  • deletion from voters list
  • defaulters
  • co-operative societies election
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (04) 18

Writ Petition No.3142 of 2023

2023-04-06

Arun R. Pedneker

Mr. V.D. Salunke for petitioners, Mr. S.K. Kadam for respondent nos.1 and 2, Mr. D.J. Chaudhari for respondent no.3

Dhanraj Dattatray Patil and 19 others

State Co-operative Elections Authority, Taluka Returning Officer, Dattatray Balaji Patil, Vivid Karyakari Seva Sahakari Sanstha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging deletion of names from provisional voters list for co-operative society election.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of order dated 10.03.2023 deleting their names from the provisional voters list.

Filing Reason

The petitioners' names were deleted from the provisional voters list without giving them an opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the deletion of names from the provisional voters list without hearing the petitioners violates principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the impugned order was passed ex-parte without any notice or opportunity of hearing. Respondents argued that the petitioners were defaulters under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

An order deleting names from the voters list without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order is passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The order cannot be sustained as it violates the principles of natural justice.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 10.03.2023 passed by the Taluka Returning Officer. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 03.04.2023, pronouncing it on 06.04.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 73(CA)(1), 75(2), 27(10)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Deletion of Names from Voters List in Co-operative Society Election. Deletion of names from provisional voters list for being defaulters under Sections 73(CA)(1), 75(2) and 27(10) of the Maharashtra ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Reinstatement of Conductor in KSRTC Dispute — Workman Foregoes Backwages and Continuity of Service. Parties Agree to Settle Industrial Dispute by Reinstating Petitioner as Conductor Without Monetary Benefits.