Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprenticeship Training by Pune Municipal Corporation. Apprenticeship Act, 1961 does not require prior notice or hearing before termination of apprenticeship contract.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by apprentices challenging their termination from apprenticeship training by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). The petitioners were engaged as apprentices under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 for a period of one year. Their training was terminated prematurely by the PMC without any prior notice or hearing. The petitioners contended that the termination was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and that they were entitled to protection under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The PMC argued that the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is a complete code and does not require any notice or hearing before termination. The court analyzed the provisions of the Apprenticeship Act, 1961, particularly Sections 4, 6, 7, 16, and 22. It held that the Act is a self-contained code and excludes the application of other industrial laws. Section 6 allows termination by either party by giving one month's notice or paying one month's wages in lieu thereof. The court found that the PMC had complied with this provision by paying one month's wages. The court also noted that an apprentice is not a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Therefore, the termination was valid and no prior hearing was required. The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the termination.

Headnote

A) Apprenticeship - Termination of Apprenticeship - Notice and Hearing - The Apprenticeship Act, 1961 does not require any prior notice or hearing before termination of a contract of apprenticeship. The Act is a complete code and the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 are not applicable to apprentices. (Paras 7-10)

B) Apprenticeship - Contract of Apprenticeship - Termination - Section 6 of the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 provides that a contract of apprenticeship may be terminated by either party by giving one month's notice or paying one month's wages in lieu thereof. The employer is not required to assign any reason or hold a hearing. (Paras 7-10)

C) Apprenticeship - Applicability of Industrial Laws - The Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is a self-contained code and excludes the application of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 to apprentices. An apprentice is not a workman under those Acts. (Paras 7-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of apprenticeship training by the Pune Municipal Corporation without prior notice or hearing is valid under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the termination of apprenticeship training was valid under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 and no prior notice or hearing was required.

Law Points

  • Apprenticeship Act
  • 1961
  • Section 4
  • Section 6
  • Section 7
  • Section 16
  • Section 22
  • termination of apprenticeship
  • notice period
  • hearing
  • contract of apprenticeship
  • apprentice
  • employer
  • Bombay Industrial Relations Act
  • 1946
  • Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 103

Writ Petition No. 2541 of 2023 and Writ Petition No. 898 of 2023

2023-03-02

2023:BHC-AS:7981-DB

Mr. Anil Anturkar, Sr. Advocate i/b. Mr. Shubham H. Misar, for Petitioner; Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, a/w. Aditya Mahadik, Ms. Sweta Shah & Krushna, for Respondent (PMC)

Rekha Uttamrao Tapse and others

Pune Municipal Corporation and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging termination of apprenticeship training by Pune Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of termination orders and reinstatement with continuity of service.

Filing Reason

Termination of apprenticeship training without prior notice or hearing.

Issues

Whether the termination of apprenticeship training without prior notice or hearing is valid under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961. Whether the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 apply to apprentices.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that termination was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice, and that they were entitled to protection under industrial laws. Respondent argued that the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is a complete code and does not require notice or hearing before termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is a complete code and excludes the application of other industrial laws. Section 6 of the Act allows termination by either party by giving one month's notice or paying one month's wages in lieu thereof. No prior hearing is required.

Judgment Excerpts

The Apprenticeship Act, 1961 is a complete code and the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 are not applicable to apprentices. Section 6 of the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 provides that a contract of apprenticeship may be terminated by either party by giving one month's notice or paying one month's wages in lieu thereof.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the termination of their apprenticeship training by the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitions were heard together and dismissed by the court.

Acts & Sections

  • Apprenticeship Act, 1961: Section 4, Section 6, Section 7, Section 16, Section 22
  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947:
  • Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Petitions — Upholds Execution Court's Refund Order for Overpaid Amount. Claimants directed to refund excess compensation as calculations by State authorities were found corre...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprenticeship Training by Pune Municipal Corporation. Apprenticeship Act, 1961 does not require prior notice or hearing before termination of apprenticeship contract.