Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Claim for Alternate Land in Lieu of Acquired Land — Kolhapur Municipal Corporation Directed to Implement 1983 Standing Committee Resolution. The Court held that a resolution of the Standing Committee is binding on the Corporation and must be implemented, directing allotment of alternate plots within six months.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Babasaheb Haji Abdul Mullani, owned land bearing Regular Survey No. 52/1 to 9, admeasuring 13,000 sq. ft., situated at Bapat Camp, Kolhapur. In 1978, the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation acquired this land for the construction of an approach road to a slaughterhouse. In 1983, the Standing Committee of the Corporation passed a resolution to allot alternate plots no. 74 and 75, each admeasuring 3150 sq. ft., situated at Regular Survey No. 87C, to the petitioner in lieu of the acquired land. Despite the resolution, the Corporation did not allot the alternate land to the petitioner. The petitioner made several representations to the Corporation, but no action was taken. On 9 January 2013, the Estate Officer informed the petitioner that compensation of Rs.44,137.54 had been paid to his father, but the petitioner disputed this, stating that the chart annexed was silent about the mode of payment and bore no signature of the petitioner or his family members. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Corporation to allot the alternate plots as per the resolution. The Court considered the submissions of both parties. The petitioner argued that the resolution of the Standing Committee was binding and ought to have been implemented. The Corporation contended that the petitioner had been paid compensation and that the resolution was not acted upon due to some reasons. The Court held that the resolution of the Standing Committee, being a decision of the Corporation, is binding and must be implemented. The Court directed the Corporation to hand over possession of plots no. 74 and 75 to the petitioner within six months from the date of the order. The Court also noted that the Corporation had not taken any steps to implement the resolution for nearly 40 years, which was unjustified. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Alternate Land Allotment - Implementation of Standing Committee Resolution - Land Acquisition - The petitioner's land was acquired by the Corporation in 1978 for construction of an approach road to a slaughterhouse. In 1983, the Standing Committee resolved to allot alternate plots no. 74 and 75 to the petitioner. The Corporation failed to implement the resolution for decades. The Court held that the resolution is binding on the Corporation and must be implemented, directing the Corporation to hand over possession of the alternate plots within six months. (Paras 3-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to allotment of alternate land in lieu of his land acquired by the Corporation, and whether the Corporation is bound to implement the resolution of its Standing Committee passed in 1983.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the writ petition and directed the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation to hand over possession of plots no. 74 and 75 to the petitioner within six months from the date of the order. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Alternate land allotment
  • Acquisition of land
  • Standing Committee resolution
  • Implementation of resolution
  • Municipal Corporation duties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 35

WRIT PETITION NO. 6811 OF 2015

2023-03-09

G. S. Kulkarni, R. N. Laddha

2023:BHC-AS:9904-DB

Mr Manoj A. Patil for the Petitioner, Mr Abhijit M Adagule a/w Ms Harvinder Kaur Rogi for the Respondent/Corporation

Babasaheb Haji Abdul Mullani

Kolhapur Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner and Estate Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to Kolhapur Municipal Corporation to allot alternate land in lieu of acquired land.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to the Corporation to allot plots no. 74 and 75 as per the 1983 resolution of the Standing Committee.

Filing Reason

The Corporation failed to implement the 1983 resolution allotting alternate land to the petitioner despite repeated requests.

Previous Decisions

The Standing Committee of the Corporation passed a resolution in 1983 to allot alternate plots to the petitioner, but the resolution was not implemented.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to allotment of alternate land in lieu of his acquired land? Whether the Corporation is bound to implement the resolution of its Standing Committee passed in 1983?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the resolution of the Standing Committee is binding and ought to have been implemented, and that the Corporation has not acted upon it for decades. Corporation contended that compensation was paid to the petitioner's father and that the resolution was not acted upon for some reasons.

Ratio Decidendi

A resolution of the Standing Committee of a Municipal Corporation is binding on the Corporation and must be implemented. The Corporation cannot ignore its own resolution for decades without justification.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the grievance of the petitioner that although he is entitled to allotment of an alternate land from the Corporation in lieu of his acquired land, still such alternate land has not been allotted to him, despite a resolution having been passed by the Corporation’s Standing Committee in the year 1983, to allot to the petitioner alternate land, namely, plots no. 74 and 75 to the petitioner. He submitted that the resolution of the Standing Committee is not acted upon till today.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in 2015 before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation to allot alternate land as per the 1983 resolution. The petition was heard and finally disposed of on 9 March 2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal Order in Service Matter — Delay Not Condoned Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case. Tribunal's refusal to condone delay upheld as Petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for delay of over 7...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession. Reservation of land for Octroi Naka was withdrawn in 1975, and the Municipal Council failed to prove any su...