Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties. Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC exercised to prevent abuse of process where parties had compromised in a dowry harassment case.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Smt. Vrushali Jayesh Kore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 355/2020 registered at Ramanand Police Station, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, along with the consequent criminal proceeding being RCC No. 66/2021 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon. The FIR was lodged by respondent No. 2, Sow. Deepali Bhushan More, alleging dowry harassment and cruelty. During the pendency of the application, the parties entered into a settlement and the respondent No. 2 consented to the quashing of the FIR. The court, after hearing the counsel for the applicant, the State, and respondent No. 2, and considering the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal, held that since the dispute is matrimonial in nature and the parties have amicably resolved their differences, continuing the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - Settlement - The High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute where the parties had amicably settled the matter, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-3)

B) Matrimonial Disputes - Dowry Harassment - Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 IPC and Section 3 Dowry Prohibition Act - Compromise - The court considered the settlement between the husband and wife and quashed the FIR, noting that the offences are primarily personal in nature and the chances of conviction are bleak. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act can be quashed on the basis of a settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application is allowed. FIR No. 355/2020 registered with Ramanand Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon and the consequent criminal proceeding RCC No. 66/2021 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon are quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • quashing of FIR on settlement
  • non-compoundable offences
  • matrimonial disputes
  • compromise
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (01) 57

Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2021

2023-01-07

Smt. Anuja Prabhudessai, R. M. Joshi

A. R. Devkate for applicant, P. G. Borade APP for State, T. K. Sant for respondent No. 2

Smt. Vrushali Jayesh Kore

The State of Maharashtra and Sow. Deepali Bhushan More

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute involving allegations of dowry harassment and cruelty.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 355/2020 and consequent criminal proceeding RCC No. 66/2021.

Filing Reason

The applicant sought quashing on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC on the basis of a settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute involving non-compoundable offences.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the parties have settled the dispute and respondent No. 2 has no objection to quashing. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 did not oppose the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court can exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes where the parties have amicably settled the matter, as continuation of such proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law and a waste of judicial time.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the First Information Report in Crime No. 355/2020 dated 12th November, 2019 registered with Ramanand Police Station, Dist. Jalgaon and consequent criminal proceeding being RCC No. 66/2021 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jalgaon, for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 1122 of 2021 under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR No. 355/2020 and RCC No. 66/2021. The court heard the parties and passed judgment on 7th January 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 498A, 323, 504, 406, 506, 34
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement Between Parties. Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC exercised to prevent abuse of process where parties had compromised in a dowry harassment case.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes University Notification Requiring Minimum 50% Marks in Each Theory Paper for MD Dermatology Examination — Directs Fresh Valuation of Answer Scripts. University Cannot Impose Additional Eligibility Criteria Beyond MCI...