Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, M/s. Organic Agro Manufactures Association, an association of bio-stimulant manufacturers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality of the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021, issued by the Union of India under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The impugned order amended the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, by inserting a definition of 'bio-stimulant' and introducing a regulatory framework for its manufacture, import, and sale. The petitioner contended that bio-stimulants are not fertilizers and thus cannot be regulated under the 1985 Order. They also argued that the absence of notification of Schedule VI prevented the requirement of provisional registration, and that very few permanent registrations had been granted. The court, after hearing the parties, held that bio-stimulants are indeed fertilizers as they are substances used to enhance plant growth and yield, falling within the definition under the 1985 Order. The court further held that the impugned order was within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and that there was no requirement for prior notification of Schedule VI before requiring provisional registration. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the amendment order.
Headnote
A) Fertilizer Control - Definition of Fertilizer - Bio-stimulants - Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 3 - Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 - The court held that bio-stimulants fall within the definition of 'fertilizer' under the 1985 Order, as they are substances used to enhance plant growth and yield. The impugned amendment bringing bio-stimulants under the regulatory framework was valid. (Paras 1-10) B) Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation - Validity of Amendment Order - Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 3 - The court held that the amendment order was within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and was not ultra vires. (Paras 1-10) C) Fertilizer Control - Provisional Registration - Schedule VI - Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 - The court held that there is no requirement that Schedule VI be notified before requiring provisional registration. The impugned order provides a transitional mechanism for existing manufacturers. (Paras 3-10)
Issue of Consideration
Whether bio-stimulants can be regulated under the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, and whether the impugned amendment order is valid.
Final Decision
The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021.
Law Points
- Bio-stimulants are fertilizers
- Essential Commodities Act
- 1955
- Section 3
- Fertilizer (Inorganic
- Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order
- 1985
- Regulation of bio-stimulants
- No requirement of prior notification of Schedule VI
- Provisional registration valid


