Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner Association's Challenge to Bio-stimulant Regulation Under Fertilizer Control Order. Bio-stimulants Held to Be Fertilizers Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and Their Regulation Under Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 Is Valid.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 111
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Organic Agro Manufactures Association, an association of bio-stimulant manufacturers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality of the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021, issued by the Union of India under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The impugned order amended the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, by inserting a definition of 'bio-stimulant' and introducing a regulatory framework for its manufacture, import, and sale. The petitioner contended that bio-stimulants are not fertilizers and thus cannot be regulated under the 1985 Order. They also argued that the absence of notification of Schedule VI prevented the requirement of provisional registration, and that very few permanent registrations had been granted. The court, after hearing the parties, held that bio-stimulants are indeed fertilizers as they are substances used to enhance plant growth and yield, falling within the definition under the 1985 Order. The court further held that the impugned order was within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and that there was no requirement for prior notification of Schedule VI before requiring provisional registration. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the validity of the amendment order.

Headnote

A) Fertilizer Control - Definition of Fertilizer - Bio-stimulants - Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 3 - Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 - The court held that bio-stimulants fall within the definition of 'fertilizer' under the 1985 Order, as they are substances used to enhance plant growth and yield. The impugned amendment bringing bio-stimulants under the regulatory framework was valid. (Paras 1-10)

B) Administrative Law - Delegated Legislation - Validity of Amendment Order - Essential Commodities Act, 1955, Section 3 - The court held that the amendment order was within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and was not ultra vires. (Paras 1-10)

C) Fertilizer Control - Provisional Registration - Schedule VI - Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985 - The court held that there is no requirement that Schedule VI be notified before requiring provisional registration. The impugned order provides a transitional mechanism for existing manufacturers. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether bio-stimulants can be regulated under the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, and whether the impugned amendment order is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity of the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021.

Law Points

  • Bio-stimulants are fertilizers
  • Essential Commodities Act
  • 1955
  • Section 3
  • Fertilizer (Inorganic
  • Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order
  • 1985
  • Regulation of bio-stimulants
  • No requirement of prior notification of Schedule VI
  • Provisional registration valid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 129

WRIT PETITION NO. 12417 OF 2022

2024-04-05

G. S. Kulkarni, Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

2024:BHC-AS:17765-DB

Mr. Prashant G. Kayande for the petitioner, Mrs. Shehnaz V. Bharucha for respondent no. 1-UOI, Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. a/w. Mr. Sachin H. Kankal, AGP for the State

M/s. Organic Agro Manufactures Association

The Union of India, through its Secretary (A& FW), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality of an amendment order regulating bio-stimulants under the Fertilizer Control Order.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to quash the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021, and to declare that bio-stimulants cannot be regulated under the 1985 Order.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, an association of bio-stimulant manufacturers, challenged the amendment order on the ground that bio-stimulants are not fertilizers and thus cannot be regulated under the Fertilizer Control Order.

Issues

Whether bio-stimulants can be regulated under the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985? Whether the impugned amendment order is valid and within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that bio-stimulants are not fertilizers and thus cannot be brought under the 1985 Order. The petitioner argued that the absence of notification of Schedule VI prevents the requirement of provisional registration. The petitioner argued that very few permanent registration applications have been granted under the 2021 order.

Ratio Decidendi

Bio-stimulants are fertilizers as they are substances used to enhance plant growth and yield, falling within the definition under the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985. The impugned amendment order is within the rule-making power of the Central Government under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and is valid. There is no requirement for prior notification of Schedule VI before requiring provisional registration.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assails the legality of the order dated 23 February, 2021 titled as 'Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021'... The primary objection as urged by the petitioner... is on the ground that the bio-stimulants ought not to be controlled / regulated, so as to brought within the purview of 1985 order which is an order in relation to Control of Fertilizers.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Amendment Order, 2021. The court heard the parties and delivered judgment on 5 April 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Essential Commodities Act, 1955: Section 3
  • Fertilizer (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985: Clause 2, Clause 20C
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Contractor's Conviction Under Section 420 IPC for Cheating Government of Burma; False Bills and Bogus Claims. Conviction Stands as Representations in Bills Caused Government to Part with Money; Special Tribunal Constitution and ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Employee's Compensation Case — Actual Monthly Wages Must Be Used for Computation. The Court held that the notification under Section 4(1B) does not cap wages; actual wages proved can be adopted, and the amendment dele...