Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Advocate Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Section 406 IPC and Delay in Trial. Petitioner, a practicing advocate, was granted bail under Section 439 CrPC as the alleged offence of criminal breach of trust was not made out and trial was likely to be prolonged.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sagar Maruti Suryawanshi, an advocate aged 46, filed a criminal writ petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered at Pimpri Police Station, Pune, for offences under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The case was also investigated by the Economic Offence Wing, CID, Pune. The petitioner had been in custody since his arrest and was lodged at Mumbai Central Prison. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co-accused, cheated the complainant by inducing him to invest in a fake scheme and forged documents. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, that the ingredients of criminal breach of trust were not made out as there was no entrustment of property, and that the trial would take a long time. The State opposed bail citing the gravity of the offence. The court, after hearing arguments, observed that the allegations primarily pertained to cheating and forgery, and the element of entrustment under Section 406 IPC was absent. The court also noted that the petitioner was a practicing advocate with no criminal antecedents and that the trial was unlikely to conclude soon. Accordingly, the court granted bail to the petitioner on certain conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and surety, and directing him not to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Delay in Trial - Petitioner, an advocate, was arrested for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust - Court held that the ingredients of Section 406 IPC were not prima facie made out as there was no entrustment of property - Further, the trial was likely to take time, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents - Bail granted with conditions (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, an advocate accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust, is entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted to the petitioner on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of like amount, subject to conditions including not tampering with evidence, not leaving India without court permission, and attending trial regularly.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • Prima facie case for Section 406 IPC
  • Delay in trial
  • Conditions for bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (04) 65

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1101 of 2024

2024-04-24

A.S. Chandurkar, Jitendra Jain

Mr. Ajay Bhise a/w Ms. Deepali K. Kedar for the Petitioner, Mr. Ajay S. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State

Sagar Maruti Suryawanshi

State of Maharashtra and Economic Offence Wing, CID, Pune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail application under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought bail in connection with FIR for offences under IPC and IT Act

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and in custody; sought release on bail

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC Whether the ingredients of Section 406 IPC are prima facie made out

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is falsely implicated, no entrustment of property, trial will take time, no criminal antecedents. State opposed bail citing gravity of offence and that investigation is ongoing.

Ratio Decidendi

For grant of bail under Section 439 CrPC, the court must consider whether a prima facie case is made out, the nature and gravity of the offence, and the likelihood of delay in trial. In this case, the ingredients of Section 406 IPC were not prima facie established, and the trial was likely to be prolonged, justifying bail.

Judgment Excerpts

The ingredients of Section 406 of IPC are not prima facie made out as there is no entrustment of property. The trial is likely to take time and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

Procedural History

FIR was registered at Pimpri Police Station; investigation also by Economic Offence Wing, CID, Pune. Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1101 of 2024 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking bail. Arguments concluded on 24.04.2024 and judgment pronounced on same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B
  • Information Technology Act, 2000: 66
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle Pending Trial in Wildlife Protection Act Case - Magistrate Has Jurisdiction Under Section 451 CrPC. The court held that Section 50(4) of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 does not bar the Magistrate ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Section 313 CrPC Questions Based on Cross-Examination Admissions. Admissions made during cross-examination by accused's counsel cannot be used as incriminating circumstances under Section 31...