Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Daughter-in-Law Under Senior Citizens Act, Holds Maintenance Tribunal Cannot Be Used to Evict Wife from Matrimonial Home. The Court ruled that the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 cannot be misused to evict a daughter-in-law who has a right of residence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanjivani Jayesh Seernani, is the daughter-in-law of senior citizens and filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18 September 2023 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Tribunal directed the petitioner and her husband to vacate the flat owned by the mother-in-law (Respondent No.1). The petitioner alleged that the forum of the Maintenance Tribunal was being misused by her husband through his parents to evict her from the matrimonial home, which is her shared household under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner married Respondent No.3 on 22 October 1997 and has been residing in the flat since marriage. She has two children. The relationship between the parties was strained, with multiple police complaints. The parents-in-law filed an application under Section 5 of the Senior Citizens Act seeking maintenance and eviction. The petitioner also filed a complaint under the DV Act. The High Court examined the scope of the Senior Citizens Act and the DV Act. It held that the Maintenance Tribunal's order was unsustainable as it failed to consider the petitioner's right of residence under Section 17 of the DV Act. The court noted that the husband did not challenge the eviction order, indicating collusion. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the Tribunal to decide the application afresh, considering the petitioner's rights under the DV Act. The court also directed that the petitioner shall not be evicted until the Tribunal passes a fresh order after hearing all parties.

Headnote

A) Senior Citizens Act - Eviction of Daughter-in-Law - Misuse of Process - Section 5, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - The Maintenance Tribunal ordered eviction of the petitioner (daughter-in-law) and her husband from the flat owned by the mother-in-law. The husband did not challenge the order. The petitioner alleged misuse of the Act by her husband through his parents to evict her from the matrimonial home. The High Court held that the Tribunal's order was unsustainable as it failed to consider the petitioner's right of residence under the DV Act. (Paras 1-10)

B) Domestic Violence Act - Right of Residence - Shared Household - Section 17, Section 19, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - The petitioner, a married woman, has a right to reside in the shared household irrespective of ownership. The Maintenance Tribunal's order directing her eviction directly infringes upon this right. The High Court emphasized that the DV Act provides protection against eviction and the Tribunal must consider such rights before passing eviction orders. (Paras 11-20)

C) Senior Citizens Act - Maintenance Tribunal - Jurisdiction - Section 5, Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - The Tribunal has jurisdiction to order eviction of children or relatives from the property of senior citizens. However, this power must be exercised cautiously, especially when the eviction would affect the rights of a daughter-in-law under the DV Act. The High Court held that the Tribunal's order was passed without considering the petitioner's rights and was thus liable to be set aside. (Paras 21-23)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 can order eviction of a daughter-in-law from the shared household, and whether such order is sustainable when the daughter-in-law has a right of residence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the order dated 18 September 2023 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal. The court directed the Tribunal to decide the application afresh, considering the petitioner's rights under the DV Act. The court further directed that the petitioner shall not be evicted until the Tribunal passes a fresh order after hearing all parties.

Law Points

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act
  • 2007
  • Section 5
  • Section 4
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
  • Section 17
  • Section 19
  • Right of residence
  • Shared household
  • Misuse of process
  • Eviction of daughter-in-law
  • Senior citizens' rights
  • Domestic violence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (03) 103

WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.28282 OF 2023

2024-03-18

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

2024:BHC-OS:4504

Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni, a/w. Ms. Shaheen Kapadia i/b. Ms. Vrushali Maindad, for Petitioner. Mr. Vivek Kantawala, a/w. Mr. Saumitra Salunke & Ms. Swapnali Chavan i/b. Mr. Pradeep Yadav, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Subhash Jha, a/w. Ms. Priti Singh i/b. Mr. Rahul Chauhan, Mr. Abhijit Bansode, for Respondent No.3.

Sanjivani Jayesh Seernani

Kavita Shyam Seernani & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of Maintenance Tribunal under Senior Citizens Act directing eviction of petitioner from flat owned by mother-in-law.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the Maintenance Tribunal's order dated 18 September 2023 and protection from eviction from her matrimonial home.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the Maintenance Tribunal's order was passed without considering her right of residence under the DV Act and that the forum was being misused by her husband through his parents to evict her.

Previous Decisions

Maintenance Tribunal passed order dated 18 September 2023 directing petitioner and her husband to vacate the flat. The husband did not challenge the order.

Issues

Whether the Maintenance Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act can order eviction of a daughter-in-law from the shared household without considering her rights under the DV Act. Whether the impugned order is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Maintenance Tribunal's order was passed without jurisdiction and in violation of her right to reside in the shared household under Section 17 of the DV Act. She contended that the proceedings were a misuse of the Senior Citizens Act by her husband through his parents. Respondents (parents-in-law) argued that they are senior citizens and entitled to seek eviction of their son and daughter-in-law from their property under Section 5 of the Senior Citizens Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Maintenance Tribunal under the Senior Citizens Act must consider the rights of a daughter-in-law under the DV Act, particularly her right to reside in the shared household, before ordering eviction. The Senior Citizens Act cannot be used as a tool to evict a wife from her matrimonial home in collusion with her husband.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner-Sanjivani is the daughter-in-law of senior citizens and has petitioned this Court challenging the Order dated 18 September 2023 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal constituted under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 complaining that the forum of Maintenance Tribunal is being misused to throw her out of her matrimonial house by the husband with connivance of his parents. The impugned order passed by the Maintenance Tribunal directs Petitioner and her husband to vacate the residence of senior citizens. The husband has however not challenged Order of the Maintenance Tribunal. The High Court held that the Tribunal's order was unsustainable as it failed to consider the petitioner's right of residence under the DV Act.

Procedural History

The parents-in-law filed an application under Section 5 of the Senior Citizens Act before the Maintenance Tribunal seeking maintenance and eviction of the petitioner and her husband. The Tribunal passed an order on 18 September 2023 directing eviction. The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order. The High Court reserved judgment on 4 March 2024 and pronounced on 18 March 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007: Section 5, Section 4
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: Section 17, Section 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Against Daughter-in-Law Under Senior Citizens Act, Holds Maintenance Tribunal Cannot Be Used to Evict Wife from Matrimonial Home. The Court ruled that the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine re...