Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax Demand Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS was rejected on ground of pending appeal, but court held that the scheme does not require withdrawal of appeal before filing declaration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 69
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Jai Sai Ram Mech & Tech India P. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in construction services, was registered under the Finance Act, 1994 for service tax. It filed periodical ST-3 returns and paid service tax where applicable. The petitioner filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) for settlement of service tax dues. The Joint Committee, by order dated 30th September 2023, rejected the declaration on the ground that an appeal was pending against the service tax demand. The petitioner challenged this rejection by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court held that the SVLDRS does not require withdrawal of appeal before filing a declaration; the committee ought to have considered the declaration on merits. The rejection was patently illegal and without jurisdiction. The court set aside the rejection order and directed the committee to consider the declaration afresh, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Service Tax - Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - Declaration - Pending Appeal - The petitioner filed a declaration under the SVLDRS for settlement of service tax dues. The Joint Committee rejected the declaration on the ground that an appeal was pending against the demand. The court held that the scheme does not require withdrawal of appeal before filing declaration; the committee ought to have considered the declaration on merits. (Paras 1-10)

B) Constitutional Law - Article 226 - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - The court entertained the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy under the scheme, as the rejection was patently illegal and without jurisdiction. (Paras 1-10)

C) Natural Justice - Opportunity of Hearing - The rejection order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the ground that an appeal was pending against the service tax demand was valid, and whether the petitioner was entitled to relief under the scheme.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the rejection order dated 30th September 2023, and directed the Joint Committee to consider the petitioner's declaration afresh, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme
  • 2019
  • Section 125
  • Section 127
  • Section 128
  • Section 129
  • Section 130
  • Section 131
  • Section 132
  • Section 133
  • Section 134
  • Section 135
  • Section 136
  • Section 137
  • Section 138
  • Finance Act
  • 1994
  • Service Tax
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Writ Petition
  • Declaration
  • Pending Appeal
  • Withdrawal of Appeal
  • Rejection of Declaration
  • Opportunity of Hearing
  • Natural Justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (02) 200

Writ Petition (L) No. 12941 of 2023

2024-02-16

G. S. Kulkarni, Firdosh P. Pooniwalla

2024:BHC-OS:5581

Ms. Deepali Kamble for the Petitioner, Ms. Bhakti Date a/w Ms. Mamta Omle for the Respondents

Jai Sai Ram Mech & Tech India P. Ltd.

Union of India, Joint Commissioner, Sabka Vishwas Committee, Deputy Commissioner

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging rejection of declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the rejection order dated 30th September 2023 and direction to the respondents to consider the declaration afresh.

Filing Reason

The Joint Committee rejected the petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS on the ground that an appeal was pending against the service tax demand.

Previous Decisions

The Joint Committee passed an order on 30th September 2023 rejecting the declaration.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the ground of pending appeal was valid. Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief under the scheme despite the pending appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the SVLDRS does not require withdrawal of appeal before filing declaration; the committee ought to have considered the declaration on merits. Respondents argued that the rejection was justified as per the scheme provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 does not require withdrawal of appeal before filing a declaration; the committee must consider the declaration on merits and cannot reject it solely on the ground of pending appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

This Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Petitioner is a Private limited company engaged in construction services. The Petitioner was registered as a Service Provider under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994. The Petitioner was paying Service Tax, where ever applicable, and was filing periodical ST-3 Returns in respect thereof.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Joint Committee rejected the declaration by order dated 30th September 2023 on the ground that an appeal was pending. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance Act, 1994:
  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Transport Undertaking in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Minor Student — Negligence of Bus Conductor and Driver Established. Tribunal's Award of Rs.22,79,100/- with 8% Interest Upheld as Appellant Failed to P...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to de...